| |
talk.politics.misc |
On Mar 17, 9:04 am, mongoose <mongoose...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 17, 1:13 am, mongoose <mongoose...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 16, 8:38 pm, "TruBlu" <tru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Pro-Tibetan Independence groups, as well as the Dalai Lama himself > > > Chinese Communist Party propagandists, such as yourself, > > Divert attention? Not at all. Calling a lie a lie is not diverting > > The 1.2 million number was used by the DL and other free Tibet groups > > > If the number of Tibetans killed was only > > Will you agree that the DL is a liar like Bush? > I believe that HH the Dalai Lama believes the numbers he has received The more we kill today, the less we have to kill tomorrow. The same is true of the monks.
> > > > had accused China of killing 1.2 million Tibetans.
> > > *continuously* try to use the number "1.2 million" to divert attention
> > > from the important issues.
> > attention.
> > It is focusing on the truth. Calling a liar a liar is not diverting
> > attention.
> > It is focusing on the truth.
> > to demonize China. They claimed that China had killed 1.2 million
> > Tibetans. And the killing of this number of Tibetans constitutes
> > incontrovertible proof that there had been genocide in Tibet. And
> > Tibet should be splitted away from China. In fact, there were no such
> > killing in Tibet. There were no gencoide in Tibet. And another plank
> > underneath the free Tibet movement disappears.
> > > 1 million - or even 100 thousand - would *that* justify all the
> > > murders of Tibetan monks and nuns? *No*. In no way whatsoever. Even
> > > the defense that you try to use as a smokescreen serves to condemn the
> > > CCP. The attention of the entire world is finally focused on the
> > > Chinese Communist Party's brutal occupation of Tibet. The half-truths
> > > that have passed as excuses for their actions so far won't help them
> > > now.
> > Respect the truth first. The rest can be discussed in due course.
> to be accurate. I do not have enough information to judge either way,
> any more than you do do. What I do know is that the *essential* issue
> is that many, many, many innocent Tibetan monks and nuns were
> *murdered* by the "People's Liberation Army". And I also know that
> shameless liars and propagandists in the service of the CCP, such as
> yourself, will try to use any dispute over exact numbers to gloss over
> this fact.
"human wave" tactics: