Web Images News Groups Books Scholar Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
#Breckinridge votes to legalize pot, paraphenalia by 3-1 margin
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 9:59 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: "5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:59:58 -0600
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 9:59 am
Subject: #Breckinridge votes to legalize pot, paraphenalia by 3-1 margin
http://rawstory.com/2009/11/breckenridge-colorado-voters-legalize-
marijuana-paraphernalia/

Breckenridge, Colorado voters legalize marijuana, paraphernalia

By Stephen C. Webster
Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009 -- 10:19 pm

Voters in the ski resort town of Breckenridge, Colorado legalized
marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia by a nearly three-to-one margin on
Tuesday.

It is the first municipality in the United States to allow paraphernalia,
such as pipes, bongs and bubblers.

"[The measure] passed 73 percent to 27 percent," ABC 7 News in Denver
reported.

"'This votes demonstrates that Breckenridge citizens overwhelmingly
believe that adults should not be punished for making the safer choice to
use marijuana instead of alcohol,' said Sean McAllister, a Breckenridge
attorney who proposed the ordinance," ABC continued.

"Possession remains illegal under state law, but Breckenridge Police
Chief Rick Holman said his department will 'still have the ability to
exercise discretion,'" Colorado's Summit Daily News added.
Story continues below...

“It's never been something that we've spent a lot of time on, so I don't
expect this to be a big change in how we really do business,” he said,
according to the Daily News.

"It will not make it more available to minors, won't make it legal to
smoke it on the street, won't get you out of trouble if you're stoned
behind the wheel," the Daily News opined in an editorial supporting the
measure. "What it says is that if you, as an adult, choose to possess
small amounts of marijuana for personal use, you won't be busted for it.
It's still a much more stringent law than those that apply to alcohol — a
substance you can own as much as you want of and consume in public."

The paper added: "Eventually, it seems these small possession busts will
be a thing of the past state-wide, which makes us conclude some kind of
'nuisance pot smoke' ordinance needs to take their place — roughly
analogous to public intoxication statutes."

In Breckenridge, which has about 3,300 registered voters, passage of the
measure is not a surprise. While an effort to legalize marijuana state-
wide failed during the 2006 elections, Breckenridge voters supported it
by a margin of nearly 3-to-1. Additionally, the petition to levy a ballot
measure that would legalize marijuana needed just under 500 signatures,
but organizers collected over 1,400.

--
Slavery: The belief that people can be property
Corporatism: The belief that property can be people.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dänk 1010011010  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 4:30 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Dänk 1010011010 <dank...@rocketmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:30:49 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 4:30 pm
Subject: Re: #Breckinridge votes to legalize pot, paraphenalia by 3-1 margin
On Nov 3, 9:59 pm, "5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com>
wrote:

> http://rawstory.com/2009/11/breckenridge-colorado-voters-legalize-
> marijuana-paraphernalia/

> Breckenridge, Colorado voters legalize marijuana, paraphernalia

> By Stephen C. Webster
> Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009 -- 10:19 pm

> Voters in the ski resort town of Breckenridge, Colorado legalized
> marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia by a nearly three-to-one margin on
> Tuesday.

> It is the first municipality in the United States to allow paraphernalia,
> such as pipes, bongs and bubblers.

This won't last long, since Obama's DEA will quickly put Breckenridge
in its place.  How dare the voters advocate states' rights, or in this
case the rights of municipal governments?  If the town of Breckenridge
is permitted to set its own rules regarding recreational drug use,
soon it will be expecting the right to set its own standards for local
schools and even speed limits on local roads.

Everyone knows that the "states' rights" guaranteed by the 10th
Amendment is just a code word for slavery and segregation.
Fortunately, America is no longer the evil federation of sovereign
states it was when it founded in 1776, but a more progressive federal
dictatorship in which states are mere administrative provinces with no
authority other than what the central government chooses to grant
them.  If we allow the state Colorado to legalize marijuana without
federal permission, soon it will be practicing slavery.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Phlip  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 7:04 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 7:04 pm
Subject: Re: #Breckinridge votes to legalize pot, paraphenalia by 3-1 margin
On Nov 4, 3:30 am, Dänk 1010011010 <dank...@rocketmail.com> wrote:

> This won't last long, since Obama's DEA will quickly put Breckenridge
> in its place.

You get back to us when that happens, k?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 7:39 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: "5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:39:22 -0600
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 7:39 pm
Subject: Re: #Breckinridge votes to legalize pot, paraphenalia by 3-1 margin

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:04:53 -0800, Phlip wrote:
> On Nov 4, 3:30 am, Dänk 1010011010 <dank...@rocketmail.com> wrote:

>> This won't last long, since Obama's DEA will quickly put Breckenridge
>> in its place.

> You get back to us when that happens, k?

Dankie is far more interested in his ideology than in any type of reality
that might appear before him.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dänk 1010011010  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5, 6:15 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Dänk 1010011010 <dank...@rocketmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 6:15 pm
Subject: Re: #Breckinridge votes to legalize pot, paraphenalia by 3-1 margin
On Nov 4, 7:39 am, "5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:04:53 -0800, Phlip wrote:
> > On Nov 4, 3:30 am, Dänk 1010011010 <dank...@rocketmail.com> wrote:

> >> This won't last long, since Obama's DEA will quickly put Breckenridge
> >> in its place.

> > You get back to us when that happens, k?

> Dankie is far more interested in his ideology than in any type of reality
> that might appear before him.

So if Democrats are such big proponents of marijuana legalization, how
many 'blue' states have legalized it?

During the 2000 campaign, someone asked Al Gore if he would be willing
to legalize marijuana if elected, since he was a former (daily)
marijuana smoker himself, and he replied that he would continue the
current policy of marijuana criminalization.

And just a few months ago one of the potheads who voted for Barack
Obama (who also used to smoke pot) asked him if he would support
marijuana legalization, and Obama just laughed at him and said no.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google