Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
The Nuclear Deal and the Desperation
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
PakistanPal  
View profile
 More options Mar 17, 11:18 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
From: PakistanPal <pakistan...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 17 2008 11:18 am
Subject: The Nuclear Deal and the Desperation
Posted: 08 Mar 2008 12:50 AM CST

So now we do not even need a President of a country to tell us what to
do. We can take instructions as happily from a junior official, be it
Burns or Boucher, as they come here cracking the whip and we to the
last man in the government stand happily in line, hands raised in
servile salute as we shout in orchestrated chorus, "we want the
nuclear deal, yes we want the nuclear deal." We plug our ears, and
continue the chant that we hope will take us to fame, individually if
not collectively, even as Parliament shouts at the top of its voice
that the nuclear deal is against the interests of the country, and the
nation is against it.

Now the ministry of external affairs does not announce the travel
schedule of its minister Pranab Mukherjee. The announcement first
comes from Washington, in this case Burns, who lets us know that our
minister will be visiting the US soon. Congress spokespersons give
briefings insisting they want the nuclear deal, the AICC is buzzing
with talk of a mid term poll and the nuclear deal. The Prime Ministers
Office is back in business with its one point agenda --everything else
is incidental--for the nuclear deal. So that leads us again to the two
questions: why does Prime Minister Manmohan Singh so desperate for the
nuclear deal, we know why Bush wants it, but why does he? And two, has
the nation now ceased to matter that its voice reflected through
Parliament over and over again is not being heard by the government
that prefers to become non accountable on an issue of immense
strategic import?

The Prime Minister wants the deal for three basic reasons. One, after
a life spent in pleasing political masters, first as a bureaucrat,
then as a minister, he has finally come into his own. Yes, of course
Congress president Sonia Gandhi is the woman behind the throne, but
then he is the recognized head of government and that is an
opportunity he knows he will not get again. Not even if the Congress
returns to power, as there are too many claimants including of course
the dynastic heir. He thus, wants to go down in history (even if its
US history) as the man who did something big: converted India
irreversibly into a strategic ally of the US and changed her course
from non alignment to total and complete alignment with the one nation
of his unipolar world. Two, his basic constituency of the middle class
and the corporates wants the nuclear deal not because it knows what
that is, but because it will open new business with the US and that is
something the mall-shoppers of India's consumer society are keen to
strengthen. And three, it will earn him fame and recognition in
international circles as a Prime Minister who can be trusted to keep
his word.

As for the second question, yes the nation has ceased to matter as
elections affect only those who contest these. The Congress party is
waiting for a feed back from the states after the populist budget to
see whether there has been any shift in the vote bank. Remember, the
last exercise had not just the UPA allies but the Congress chief
ministers making it clear to the central leadership that a mid term
poll would be disastrous. The Congress now wants to know whether the
situation on the ground is the same or whether the huge waiver for the
farmers has made a difference in the rural areas, or whether the
constant concessions being announced for the minorities has finally
made them happy, or whether the women and the senior citizens have
been wooed over by the gestures made for their economic welfare.
Although the feedback is awaited, it will not be too premature to
predict that this will not indicate any shift in the vote bank, and
that the anger and frustration is too deep rooted to be overcome in a
matter of weeks.

And that takes us to the third question, that of course, the Prime
Minister is not concerned with. Can the Congress convert the nuclear
deal and the subsequent fall of the government into an electoral
asset? No, it cannot for the political parties opposing the nuclear
deal have already taken this to the masses on an anti-imperialist
plank. They want to sell us to the Americans, is the slogan that still
has the power to unite the people of India on an anti-US platform. The
price rise, inflation, farmers unrest, non governance, Israel, West
Asia, Iran all rolled into one is a potent mixture for regime change,
of course not through shock and awe but peacefully through the ballot.
And while those in power today can control any thing, they will still
find it difficult to manage the millions who pour out on election day
to cast their vote, made even more precious by the fact that it is the
only say they have in governance in five years.

The Left has asked for a meeting of the UPA-Left joint committee on
March 15. CPI(M) general secretary Prakash Karat who has refused to
react to government inspired media flak has insisted on timing the
entire 'operation' rather astutely. The government will now be
required to inform the Left parties about the status of the agreement
with the IAEA. Is it over, if so then place it before the committee
and sit back and wait for the outcome. If not, when will the
safeguards agreement be ready, specify a date and time. Also if Mr
Mukherjee is going to Washington he must inform the committee and
Parliament before his departure whether he is going to clinch the
nuclear deal, or express his regret. If he is going ahead with the
deal, then the government will go in April without the Finance bill
being passed. This will create a constitutional crisis, and the
government will have to go for a vote on account before it can
recommend the dissolution of the House and fresh polls. It will then
have to go to the people and let them know why the nuclear deal was
more important than the budget, and why it preferred to go with the US
than ensure the passage of the budget.

We might as journalists get very excited with the "bold" sound bytes
emerging from the government and the Congress party, but the reality
is that the government cannot go ahead with the nuclear deal and hope
to win an election. There is a certain anger and unhappiness in the
country, the undercurrents of which are very apparent to those with an
ear to the ground. The minorities are particularly unhappy with the
repercussions of the global war against terror, and are definitely
amongst the first to have climbed on to the anti-imperialist plank.
The poor and the oppressed have seen little in five years to convince
them that the Congress party is working for their uplift. We have 53
of the worlds billionaires, ranking fourth in the list of countries,
even as 300 million plus Indians live on less than one dollar a day.
So this will bring the economic reforms on the electoral table, with
the poor coming out to vote on this burning issue as well. Who will
the vote be against? Surely, even Congressmen do not need to guess
that one.

The truth cannot be concealed behind created lies. The truth cannot be
hidden behind orchestrated sound bytes. The truth has the habit of
spilling out into the streets, as governments and prime ministers of
India have known in the past. Truth also has the habit of creeping in
from the back when those who have tried to put a lid on it, least
expect it. The tallest fall like skittles, when they forget the power
of the people.
Photo credit: Arrival of Manmohan Singh at White House

(IMB Editor's Note: The Asian Age editors have been sacked by the new
management.  Mr M. J. Akbar, the founder of the newspaper, has been
unceremoniously replaced with T. Venkatt Ram Reddy. As an immediate
impact the above column was not allowed to be published under the new
management.)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google