Web Images News Groups Books Scholar Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  23 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Harry Hope  
View profile  
 More options Oct 31, 9:24 pm
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:24:54 -0400
Local: Sat, Oct 31 2009 9:24 pm
Subject: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change

http://m.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/oct/30/warming-now-killing-trees/

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Sun editorial:

Warming now killing trees

Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate
change

Anyone who has driven through the Rocky Mountains and other
high-altitude Western areas in recent months has seen the work of the
mountain pine beetle.

Pine trees that once spread gloriously over millions of acres are now
either dead or dying.

The beetle, not much bigger than a bedbug, is native to the West and
has always been known as a tree killer.

For centuries it has killed a few diseased trees here, a patch of
trees there, but never before has it caused destruction on the scale
being seen today.

U.S. Forest Service scientist Jesse Logan and other forest researchers
have discovered that the beetles are responding to higher average
temperatures by breeding almost nonstop.

They are no longer being held in balance by the lower winter
temperatures that once prevailed.

The death of so many trees, which imperils the habitat of animals and
threatens catastrophic forest fires, is further evidence that the
planet is warming at an alarming rate.

Appearing on a National Public Radio show this week, Logan said the
warming is not part of a natural cycle, as many climate-change deniers
insist.

“It is directly our actions that are taking these forests out,” Logan
said.

Scientists around the world agree with Logan:

Human activity, principally the burning of fossil fuels for energy, is
responsible for rapidly accelerating warming.

Worldwide consequences include the melting of polar ice and weird
weather, including shorter springs and extended summers that cause
droughts.

That is why Congress is nearing debate on a climate-change bill that
would cap the emissions of greenhouse gases from American industries
and set goals for converting to non-emitting power sources such as
solar and wind.

Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, trap heat in the atmosphere
that would otherwise escape harmlessly into space.

It is imperative to pass this bill so more and bigger changes in
energy production can start immediately.

Those who deny the urgency should take a drive through the West.

_______________________________________________________

Harry


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Red Cloud  
View profile  
 More options Oct 31, 11:00 pm
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Oct 31 2009 11:00 pm
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On Oct 31, 8:24 am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Greenhouse gases is heating up the area causing melting of ice. That's
why
Swiss has banned  fossil fuel car over 5,000 feet in order to protect
their
glacier.  They use electric motors up in Alpine street.

In Southern CA, the last forest fire and brushfire was the worst one
ever...The  fire  was easy to spread out fast due to the wind and
warmed air.  The effort of  fire-fighter were futile.

I don't have to go to Rocky Mountain to see the destruction of the
trees...
I can visit here 3 of my favourite mountain bikepath are gone. Many
trees  burnt
out blacken..


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
BDR529  
View profile  
 More options Oct 31, 11:17 pm
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: BDR529 <jake>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:17:20 +0100
Local: Sat, Oct 31 2009 11:17 pm
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change

That's funny, I was able to take the Gotthard pass this summer without
any problems. And, I did not receive a ticket.

> In Southern CA, the last forest fire and brushfire was the worst one
> ever...The  fire  was easy to spread out fast due to the wind and
> warmed air.  The effort of  fire-fighter were futile.

> I don't have to go to Rocky Mountain to see the destruction of the
> trees...
> I can visit here 3 of my favourite mountain bikepath are gone. Many
> trees  burnt
> out blacken..

Q

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Monkey Clumps  
View profile  
 More options Oct 31, 11:37 pm
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Monkey Clumps <spacebrai...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Oct 31 2009 11:37 pm
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On Oct 31, 11:24 am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

But even proponents admit that proposed reductions in US CO2 emissions
will have a barely measurable impact on temperatures, particularly
since China and India have made it clear that they have no intention
of following suit. So why would we want to spend trillions trying
vainly to stop something when we know that the approach simply won't
work? If certain tree species are being impacted by global warming,
then rest assured other species adapted to warmer climates will move
in. The pine trees will just move further north, expanding their range
into areas that were one treeless tundra.  So its really not the end
of the world.  Let's embrace climate change and keep the lights on by
continuing to burn fossil fuels.  Despite all the hand-waving and
political grandstanding, that's whats going to happen anyway.  If you
think that solar and wind will amount to more than a tiny fraction of
our energy production you are kidding yourself.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
matt_sykes  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 12:03 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: matt_sykes <zzeb...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 12:03 am
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On 31 Oct, 17:24, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Of coursem "gloriously"m to be teamed with "majestic" no doubt.  Why
do tree huggers always use the same emotionalised language?

Weird indeed.  Meanwhile on the real worldm weather is just the same
as it always was.

> That is why Congress is nearing debate on a climate-change bill that
> would cap the emissions of greenhouse gases from American industries
> and set goals for converting to non-emitting power sources such as
> solar and wind.

> Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, trap heat in the atmosphere
> that would otherwise escape harmlessly into space.

Greenhouse gases also re=emit solar IR energy back into space.

> It is imperative to pass this bill so more and bigger changes in
> energy production can start immediately.

> Those who deny the urgency should take a drive through the West.

> _______________________________________________________

> Harry

Basiically a load or alarmist crap.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
matt_sykes  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 12:05 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: matt_sykes <zzeb...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 12:05 am
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On 31 Oct, 19:00, Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

That is either a waste of time, it woldnt make any difference, or a
lie.

> In Southern CA, the last forest fire and brushfire was the worst one
> ever...The  fire  was easy to spread out fast due to the wind and
> warmed air.  The effort of  fire-fighter were futile.

Bull.  There have always been fires.  The reason they are so
destructive is that people no longer clear back te scrub in the
forest.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
richp  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 12:09 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: richp <travelingman95...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 12:09 am
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On Oct 31, 12:05 pm, matt_sykes <zzeb...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Not like you filthy dickhead

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Catoni  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 12:10 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Catoni <caton...@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
Harry Hope typed:

              .........opinionated article from the popular press....

             Reply:

                  More Gorebull Warming lies. Those who study the
situation realize that it has nothing to do with gorebull Warming and
everything to do with bad modern forest management and tree harvesting
practices.

             Like forest fires, bark beetles play an important role in
the natural life cycle of a forest. By attacking older or weakened
trees, bark beetles help hasten the development of younger forests.

           We've always had droughts on and off, we've had warmer
tempratures before, such as during the Medeival Warm Period and the
Eemian, which was even warmer then now with the tree line two or three
hundred miles further north.

              The  pine bark beetle prefer trees that are around
eighty to ninety years old which is now what many of the trees left in
the forests are.

              In the past, forest fires controlled the pine bark
beetle by burning large areas and the younger trees that grew in place
were not as favorable to the beetle. Now we fight these fires with
fire breaks and firefighting.

            Trees damaged by lightning, hail, wind, fire, construction
or tree harvesting equipment, heavy pruning but manage to survive emit
odors that attract bark beetles.
              The harvesting of trees for lumber and paper pulp has
cut huge swathes of forests down. Just use Google Earth to check for
yourself.
               Zoom in on for instance, British Columbia, and as you
close in, you will see a sick forest that is a patchwork of harvesting
that looks like a disease from high up.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
richp  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 12:10 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: richp <travelingman95...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 12:10 am
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On Oct 31, 12:05 pm, matt_sykes <zzeb...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Not like now you filthy dickhead

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
leonard78sp@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 12:57 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: "leonard7...@gmail.com" <leonard7...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 12:57 am
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On Oct 31, 12:24 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>m.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/oct/30/warming-now-killing-trees/

> Saturday, October 31, 2009

> Sun editorial:

> Warming now killing trees

> Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate
> change

•• Where is there proof of cause?
    Since there is no proof, the Las Vegas
    editorialist is either lying or is an ignorant
    jackass.  A year ago ±, I posted in these groups,
    that those trees are 200+  years old and should
    have been lumbered before the beetles could
    get them.

    The trees were dying 50 years ago before the
    Beetles appeared

> Anyone who has driven through the Rocky Mountains and other
> high-altitude Western areas in recent months has seen the work of the
> mountain pine beetle.

> Pine trees that once spread gloriously over millions of acres are now
> either dead or dying.

•• The blame lies with the environmentalists who
    seem to think that everything in nature should
    live for millennia just like the underbrush that
    nature burns annually.

> The beetle, not much bigger than a bedbug, is native to the West and
> has always been known as a tree killer.

> For centuries it has killed a few diseased trees here, a patch of
> trees there, but never before has it caused destruction on the scale
> being seen today.

> U.S. Forest Service scientist Jesse Logan and other forest researchers
> have discovered that the beetles are responding to higher average
> temperatures by breeding almost nonstop.

•• They are breeding non-stop because they have
    nesting places under the bark of dying 200
    year old trees

> They are no longer being held in balance by the lower winter
> temperatures that once prevailed.

•• NONSENSE

> The death of so many trees, which imperils the habitat of animals and
> threatens catastrophic forest fires, is further evidence that the
> planet is warming at an alarming rate.

•• Since the data shows that the globe has been
    cooling for 10 years and that the global climate
    over all had only warmed by less than 1 degree
    Celsius in 150 years so the warming excuse is
    a cop out.

> Appearing on a National Public Radio show this week, Logan said the
> warming is not part of a natural cycle, as many climate-change deniers
> insist.

•• ROTFLMAO - He is speaking of global
    warming.  Global warming is a myth and does
    not exist. On the other hand "Climate Change"
    is functioning as it has for 5 million years or
    more.

> “It is directly our actions that are taking these forests out,” Logan
> said.

•• It is just "their" past inactions that are taking
    these forests out

> Scientists around the world agree with Logan:

•• Only those scientists on government payrolls
    would agree.

> Human activity, principally the burning of fossil fuels for energy, is
> responsible for rapidly accelerating warming.

•• I  wonder how the editorialist would explain
    the below freezing temps in Denver. I guess
    he is an AGW alarmist and will blame it on
    burning "fossil" fuels.

   "Burning fossil fuels" accounts for 100,000
    tonnes of CO2. While  photosynthetic
    organisms convert around 100,000,000,000
    tonnes of carbon (CO2) into biomass per year.

> Worldwide consequences include the melting of polar ice

•• Only happens in the summertine.

> and weird
> weather, including shorter springs

•• longer winters, perhaps - I've experienced a
    blizzard  NYC in March that took me a month
    to dig out.

> and extended summers that cause
> droughts.

•• What droughts???

I just realized that this turkey is pandering to
Sen Harry Reid

> That is why Congress is nearing debate on a climate-change bill that
> would cap the emissions of greenhouse gases from American industries
> and set goals for converting to non-emitting power sources such as
> solar and wind.

> Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, trap heat in the atmosphere
> that would otherwise escape harmlessly into space.

•• NONSENSE - CO2 has zero effect on the
    atmosphere. We need all thge CO2 we can get,
    it is essential for all life on the planet

> It is imperative to pass this bill so more and bigger changes in
> energy production can start immediately.

•• That bill will do nothing of that. Rather it is
    another tax and spend rip off

–– ––
    So far neither IPCC nor has anyone else provided
     one iota of valid data for global warming nor have
     they provided data that climate change is being
     effected by commerce and industry, and not by
     natural phenomena.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change" by leonard78sp@gmail.com
leonard78sp@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 4:53 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
Followup-To: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: "leonard7...@gmail.com" <leonard7...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 4:53 am
Subject: Re: Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change
On Oct 31, 3:10 pm, Catoni <caton...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Harry Hopeless typed:

>               .........opinionated article from the popular press....

     following a PBS propaganda piece
 >

•• Bullshit
    What you see are new young trees now able to
    see the sun. Without CO2 and the sunshine they
    can not grow

•• The trees in the Vegas Sun editorial, have been
    sequestered and were old growth when Teddy
    Roosevelt was president.

    They are dying with or without the bark beetles.

•• As for that editorial -- The must of been toadying
    up to Harry Reid


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change" by Red Cloud
Red Cloud  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 8:39 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 8:39 am
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On Oct 31, 11:05 am, matt_sykes <zzeb...@hotmail.com> wrote:

 It does surely  make sense when you live in big  city, the heat is
trapped in
greenhouse warming effect that raise temperature up than living in
open wild space where heat trapped does not happen. In Aphine, the
Greenhouse heat would trap by the surround mountain which melt the
glacier. So Swiss banned all gasoline
automobile. I saw the electric automobile they run through the city.

> > In Southern CA, the last forest fire and brushfire was the worst one
> > ever...The  fire  was easy to spread out fast due to the wind and
> > warmed air.  The effort of  fire-fighter were futile.

> Bull.  There have always been fires.  The reason they are so
> destructive is that people no longer clear back te scrub in the
> forest.

  True there was always brushfire in Southern CA. The lastest one is
the worse
one ever.  The air was hot and the wind was blowing so hard so easy
to  spread the fire all over the forest area.  The fire-fighter effort
was totally worthless to control it.    I saw the sky the smoke
blowing up into atmosphere  creating a giant mushroom cloud. I thought
the nuclear bomb was blown up. OH my god!  Mass smokes created the
giant mushroom cloud. I've never seen that before... The fires were
burning  for 10 days.

Yes it is getting worse...


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Al Bedo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 2, 2:01 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Al Bedo <alb...@the.turn.of.the.century?>
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:01:31 -0700
Local: Mon, Nov 2 2009 2:01 am
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change

Harry Hope wrote:
> Warming now killing trees

> Anyone who has driven through the Rocky Mountains and other
> high-altitude Western areas in recent months has seen the work of the
> mountain pine beetle.

> They are no longer being held in balance by the lower winter
> temperatures that once prevailed.

Slight problem.

Presumably the pine beetle has gotten worse over the last decade
in the Rocky Mountains.

But winter temperatures have fallen over the last decade in the Rockies.

So perhaps it's cooling that is killing the trees.
(that's what the data indicates.)

You're obviously too busy to look at any actual data,
but here it is:

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2009&m...


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Catoni  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 5:35 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Catoni <caton...@sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:35:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 5:35 am
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On Oct 31, 10:39 pm, Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

With the help of the arsonists that the police have been looking for.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change" by Last Post
Last Post  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 6:23 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:23:31 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 6:23 am
Subject: Re: Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change
On Oct 31, 10:39 pm, Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

•• Brush fires are a natural phenomenum by
   which it clears out the dead underbrush,
    permitting new growth to come up in the
    spring. Environmental idiots pressured
    California to leave the brush alone, so now
    there is accumulated more dry brush fuel
    so the fires are more intense and they start
    to turn a brush fire into a forest fire.

•• Shoot an envronmentalist day "wood" be
    very constructive.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Last Post  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 6:32 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 6:32 am
Subject: Re: Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change
On Nov 1, 4:01 pm, Al Bedo <alb...@the.turn.of.the.century?> wrote:

•• Your data is irrelevant

    Most of those tree are 200 to 300 years old
    and should have been selectively harvested
    long ago. Now they are dying and the bark
    beetles are feasting


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Last Post  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 6:33 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
Followup-To: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 6:33 am
Subject: Re: Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change
On Nov 1, 5:59 pm, gordo <grmerr...@shaw.ca.remove> wrote:

•• Same crap from above

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Red Cloud  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 9:36 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 9:36 am
Subject: Re: Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change
On Nov 2, 5:23 pm, Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca> wrote:

 Pwhahaha...How stop at brushfire? Why not try mass houses fires?
House fire is natural. It replaces old house and provides an space and
opporutnity
 to build new houses.  Try  hurricane. Katrina type of mass flooding.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Last Post  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 9:33 pm
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:33:33 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 9:33 pm
Subject: Re: Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change
On Nov 2, 11:36 pm, Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Nov 2, 5:23 pm, Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca> wrote:
> > •• Brush fires are a natural phenomenum by
> >    which it clears out the dead underbrush,
> >     permitting new growth to come up in the
> >     spring. Environmental idiots pressured
> >     California to leave the brush alone, so now
> >     there is accumulated more dry brush fuel
> >     so the fires are more intense and they start
> >     to turn a brush fire into a forest fire.

>  Pwhahaha...How stop at brushfire? Why not try mass houses fires?
> House fire is natural. It replaces old house and provides an space and
> opporutnity
>  to build new houses.  Try  hurricane. Katrina type of mass flooding.

•• Try seeing your neurosurgeon, you need a brain sheck


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Red Cloud  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 9:47 pm
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 9:47 pm
Subject: Re: Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change
On Nov 3, 8:33 am, Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca> wrote:

 Did you meant that brushfire is naturally burnt? When the wind was
blowing
so hard in heat air, do you believe the spreading fire to other forest
is just natural?
Or climate disaster is just natural?

> > > •• Shoot an envronmentalist day "wood" be
> > >     very constructive.

  .

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Last Post  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 10:59 pm
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 10:59 pm
Subject: Re: Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change
On Nov 3, 11:47 am, Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

•• The current state: those areas that are not burnt
    will be next autumn or the following if the
    underbrush is not cut out asap. That does not
    require up rooting, just pruning down to about
    6- 9 inches. New growth will appear in the spring
    and should be pruned in the fall.

•• The reason that the fires have got to the trees is
    the huge quantities of fuel mostly upright to
    create huge bonfires reaching up into the trees.

 •• Shoot an envronmentalist day "wood" be
     very constructive.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
I M @ good guy  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 5:23 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: "I M @ good guy" <I...@good.guy>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:23:22 -0400
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 5:23 am
Subject: Re: Massive Destruction in Western Forests Has Zero to do With Climate Change
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:47:41 -0800 (PST), Red Cloud <mmdir2...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

         Wind doesn't blow without socialist Global Warming?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change" by Last Post
Last Post  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 11:51 am
Newsgroups: sci.environment, talk.politics.misc, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.energy, alt.global-warming
From: Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 11:51 am
Subject: Re: Massive destruction in Western forests a graphic example of climate change
On Nov 1, 4:01 pm, Al Bedo <alb...@the.turn.of.the.century?> wrote:

•• that has some impact for sure but
   those trees are dying of old age!!

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google