On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:47:50 -0700, znuybv wrote: > On Oct 29, 3:38 pm, Steve <stevencan...@yahooooooo.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:54:36 -0500, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09"
>> <d...@dead.com> wrote: >> >On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>> >> While bowing before me, "5259 Dead, 392 since 1/20/09" >> >> <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote ...
>> >>>>Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>> >>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>> >>>>>>For instance, a legitimate news organization does not:
>> >>>>>> * Source its research to "conservative blogs."
>> >>>>>And Media Matters isn't a blog?
>> >>>Yes. They're an advocacy group and a media watchdog. They don't >> >>>pretend to be a news station.
>> >> Media Matters advocates for Left Wing Fringe. Media Watchdogs? >> >> That's like having a pommeranian patrol the Pentagon.
>> >Judging from the ease with which that building can be attacked, maybe >> >that's what they do.
>> >But that little pomeranian seems to have you hissing and spitting >> >pretty good.
>> >>>>These are the left wing shills who yesterday implied Rush is a >> >>>>racist while giving Jimmy Carter a free pass for the same thing.
>> >>>They did nothing of the sort. You're just trying to manuever Rush >> >>>into being the victim again.
>> >> Rush is too big of a personality to be a victim. Media Matters on >> >> the other hand is too small to make a difference.
>> >Oh, please. Did you hear Rush howling about how the big bad libruls >> >beat him up over the St. Louis Rams thing? He's always trying to make >> >himself and his listeners out to be the victims of some damned thing >> >or another.
>> Maybe you'd be better off if you'd try to do something constructive >> instead of listening all day to talk radio... because it's pretty >> clear that Obama isn't going to buy your gas nor pay your rent...
>> --
>> Contrary to what liberals are whining, nobody owes you anything.
> If you want to find out whats in the Obama/Pelosi/Reid health care bill > you can either read 2,000 pages of gibberish or listen to talk radio.
>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote: >>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say it was >>>fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word blindly >>>without posting any back up.
>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who resent >> conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but listen to >> Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can twist to >> discredit conservatives.
>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell mommy!!"
>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral disease >called Fox.
Jon Stewart who thinks it's funny to make faces and stare at the camera? And an admitted left wing brood who stalks conservatives like Rush and Fox News.
> Why the Beltway press has invested so much time and energy in recent > weeks defending Fox News, with one scribe even claiming that the White > House's public critique of the network was "dangerous to press freedom," > and why the press refuses to acknowledge what's so obvious about the > cable channel's political pursuits, remains baffling.
Only to the terminally short-sighted. They see that Obama is trying to set a precedent wherein the Prez decides whether or not a news organization is "legit," and they know goddamn well that the next Republican Prez -- who will be elected in 2012 -- could point to Obama and claim the moral authority do do THE SAME THING to Obama's teabagger media.
>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a brain >>>>> cell.
>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that every >>>>one of them was hotlinked).
>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say it was >>>fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word blindly >>>without posting any back up.
>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who resent >> conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but listen to >> Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can twist to >> discredit conservatives.
>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell mommy!!"
>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral disease >called Fox.
Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the antidotes.
The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of programming is ‘news,’ Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more hours than ABC, CBS and NBC.
Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America and CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and "Morning in America."
Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like the article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
Stewart goes on to say.
"Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course they are biased. Of course they are."
Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally held view
DUH!
-Stewart is a retard. -Stewart does not know what an opinion is. -You like Stewart. -Therefore, you must be a retard.
=O=
When you speak me address me:
His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Barack Hussein Obama Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Conqueror of the British Empire
>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a >>>>>> brain cell.
>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that >>>>>every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say it >>>>was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who resent >>> conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but listen to >>> Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can twist to >>> discredit conservatives.
>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell mommy!!"
>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>disease called Fox.
> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the > antidotes.
Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a way you're right.
> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of > programming is ‘news,’ Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more hours > than ABC, CBS and NBC.
> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and > Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America and > CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and "Morning in > America."
> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like the > article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and Stewart did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed wall between news and "opiniontainment" is.
> Stewart goes on to say.
> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course they > are biased. Of course they are."
> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a > particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than > impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally held > view
Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
<d...@dead.com> wrote: >On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >> wrote ...
>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a >>>>>>> brain cell.
>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that >>>>>>every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say it >>>>>was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who resent >>>> conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but listen to >>>> Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can twist to >>>> discredit conservatives.
>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell mommy!!"
>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>disease called Fox.
>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the >> antidotes.
>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a way >you're right.
>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >hours >> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and >> Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America and >> CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and "Morning in >> America."
>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like the >> article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and Stewart >did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed wall between >news and "opiniontainment" is.
>> Stewart goes on to say.
>> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course they >> are biased. Of course they are."
>> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
>> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a >> particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than >> impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally held >> view
>Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
...David (Zepp) Jamieson likes to pretend his opinions are significant.
--
Contrary to what liberals are whining, nobody owes you anything.
>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:15:18 -0500, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" ><d...@dead.com> wrote:
>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >>> wrote ...
>>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a >>>>>>>> brain cell.
>>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that >>>>>>>every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say it >>>>>>was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who resent >>>>> conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but listen to >>>>> Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can twist to >>>>> discredit conservatives.
>>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell mommy!!"
>>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>>disease called Fox.
>>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the >>> antidotes.
>>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a way >>you're right.
>>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >>> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >>hours >>> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and >>> Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America and >>> CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and "Morning in >>> America."
>>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like the >>> article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
>>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and Stewart >>did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed wall between >>news and "opiniontainment" is.
>>> Stewart goes on to say.
>>> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course they >>> are biased. Of course they are."
>>> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
>>> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a >>> particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than >>> impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally held >>> view
>>Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
>...David (Zepp) Jamieson likes to pretend his opinions are >significant.
He's a joker or a joke like John Stewart.
=O=
When you speak me address me:
His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Barack Hussein Obama Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Conqueror of the British Empire
>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >> wrote ...
>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a >>>>>>> brain cell.
>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that >>>>>>every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say it >>>>>was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who resent >>>> conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but listen to >>>> Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can twist to >>>> discredit conservatives.
>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell mommy!!"
>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>disease called Fox.
>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the >> antidotes.
>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a way >you're right.
Media Matters hasn't done anything significant to support their whine about Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >hours >> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and >> Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America and >> CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and "Morning in >> America."
>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like the >> article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and Stewart >did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed wall between >news and "opiniontainment" is.
That's it! John Stewart is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
>> Stewart goes on to say.
>> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course they >> are biased. Of course they are."
>> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
>> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a >> particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than >> impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally held >> view
>Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
And John Stewart is a news critic? He's just a comedian with an opinion.
>> DUH!
>> -Stewart is a retard. >> -Stewart does not know what an opinion is. -You like Stewart. >> -Therefore, you must be a retard.
=O=
When you speak me address me:
His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Barack Hussein Obama Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Conqueror of the British Empire
> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> > wrote ...
>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >>> wrote ...
>>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a >>>>>>>> brain cell.
>>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that >>>>>>>every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say it >>>>>>was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who resent >>>>> conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but listen >>>>> to Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can twist to >>>>> discredit conservatives.
>>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell >>>>> mommy!!"
>>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>>disease called Fox.
>>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the >>> antidotes.
>>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a way >>you're right.
> Media Matters hasn't done anything significant to support their whine > about Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
Then you haven't got a thing to worry about when I post material from them, do you?
>>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >>> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >>hours >>> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and >>> Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America >>> and CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and >>> "Morning in America."
>>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like >>> the article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
>>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and Stewart >>did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed wall between >>news and "opiniontainment" is.
> That's it! John Stewart is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
>>> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course >>> they are biased. Of course they are."
>>> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
>>> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a >>> particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than >>> impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally >>> held view
>>Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
> And John Stewart is a news critic? He's just a comedian with an opinion.
Jon Stewart. Practice for a while, and I'm sure you'll get it.
And yes. He's a comedian with an opinion. He'll be the first to tell you so. But you sure are afraid of him.
<d...@dead.com> wrote: >On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:37:38 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >> wrote ...
>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >>>> wrote ...
>>>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a >>>>>>>>> brain cell.
>>>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>>>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that >>>>>>>>every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say it >>>>>>>was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who resent >>>>>> conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but listen >>>>>> to Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can twist to >>>>>> discredit conservatives.
>>>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell >>>>>> mommy!!"
>>>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>>>disease called Fox.
>>>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the >>>> antidotes.
>>>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a way >>>you're right.
>> Media Matters hasn't done anything significant to support their whine >> about Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
>Then you haven't got a thing to worry about when I post material from >them, do you?
>> He's a comedian. He has not the credentials that say he is an expert to >> comment on news channels.
>Um, since when does anyone need to be an expert to comment on news >channels? Or Faux, for that matter?
>>>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >>>> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >>>hours >>>> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>>>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and >>>> Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America >>>> and CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and >>>> "Morning in America."
>>>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like >>>> the article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
>>>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and Stewart >>>did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed wall between >>>news and "opiniontainment" is.
>> That's it! John Stewart is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
>OK. Don't take him seriously then.
>As a famous Republican said, "Why so SERIOUS?"
>>>> Stewart goes on to say.
>>>> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course >>>> they are biased. Of course they are."
>>>> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
>>>> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a >>>> particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than >>>> impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally >>>> held view
>>>Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
>> And John Stewart is a news critic? He's just a comedian with an opinion.
>Jon Stewart. Practice for a while, and I'm sure you'll get it.
>And yes. He's a comedian with an opinion. He'll be the first to tell >you so. But you sure are afraid of him.
>>>> DUH!
>>>> -Stewart is a retard. >>>> -Stewart does not know what an opinion is. -You like Stewart. >>>> -Therefore, you must be a retard.
>> =O=
>> When you speak me address me:
>> His Excellency, President for Life, >> Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor >> Barack Hussein Obama Dada, VC, DSO, >> MC, Conqueror of the British Empire
--
Contrary to what liberals are whining, nobody owes you anything.
>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:37:38 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >> wrote ...
>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >>>> wrote ...
>>>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a >>>>>>>>> brain cell.
>>>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>>>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that >>>>>>>>every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say it >>>>>>>was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who resent >>>>>> conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but listen >>>>>> to Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can twist to >>>>>> discredit conservatives.
>>>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell >>>>>> mommy!!"
>>>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>>>disease called Fox.
>>>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the >>>> antidotes.
>>>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a way >>>you're right.
>> Media Matters hasn't done anything significant to support their whine >> about Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
>Then you haven't got a thing to worry about when I post material from >them, do you?
I don't. I find it fun to point out the idiots who take them for their word. You are an easy target to find for supporting Media Matters.
>>>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >>>> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >>>hours >>>> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>>>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and >>>> Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America >>>> and CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and >>>> "Morning in America."
>>>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like >>>> the article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
>>>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and Stewart >>>did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed wall between >>>news and "opiniontainment" is.
>> That's it! John Stewart is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
>OK. Don't take him seriously then.
O don't but idiots like you do. You even gave me a link.
>>>> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course >>>> they are biased. Of course they are."
>>>> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
>>>> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a >>>> particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than >>>> impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally >>>> held view
>>>Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
>> And John Stewart is a news critic? He's just a comedian with an opinion.
>Jon Stewart. Practice for a while, and I'm sure you'll get it.
You're just a clown with a stupid opinion. At least Stewart is a little more sophisticated.
>And yes. He's a comedian with an opinion. He'll be the first to tell >you so. But you sure are afraid of him.
>>>> DUH!
>>>> -Stewart is a retard. >>>> -Stewart does not know what an opinion is. -You like Stewart. >>>> -Therefore, you must be a retard.
=O=
When you speak me address me:
His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Barack Hussein Obama Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Conqueror of the British Empire
> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> > wrote ...
>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:37:38 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >>> wrote ...
>>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" >>>>> <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a >>>>>>>>>> brain cell.
>>>>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>>>>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that >>>>>>>>>every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say >>>>>>>>it was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who >>>>>>> resent conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but >>>>>>> listen to Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can >>>>>>> twist to discredit conservatives.
>>>>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>>>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell >>>>>>> mommy!!"
>>>>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>>>>disease called Fox.
>>>>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the >>>>> antidotes.
>>>>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a way >>>>you're right.
>>> Media Matters hasn't done anything significant to support their whine >>> about Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
>>Then you haven't got a thing to worry about when I post material from >>them, do you?
> I don't. I find it fun to point out the idiots who take them for their > word. You are an easy target to find for supporting Media Matters.
In that case, you'll be delighted to learn that I plan to keep right on doing it.
>>>>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >>>>> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >>>>hours >>>>> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>>>>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and >>>>> Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America >>>>> and CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and >>>>> "Morning in America."
>>>>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like >>>>> the article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
>>>>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and >>>>Stewart did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed >>>>wall between news and "opiniontainment" is.
>>> That's it! John Stewart is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
>>OK. Don't take him seriously then.
> O don't but idiots like you do. You even gave me a link.
>>>>> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course >>>>> they are biased. Of course they are."
>>>>> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
>>>>> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a >>>>> particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than >>>>> impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally >>>>> held view
>>>>Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
>>> And John Stewart is a news critic? He's just a comedian with an >>> opinion.
>>Jon Stewart. Practice for a while, and I'm sure you'll get it.
> You're just a clown with a stupid opinion. At least Stewart is a little > more sophisticated.
>>And yes. He's a comedian with an opinion. He'll be the first to tell >>you so. But you sure are afraid of him.
>>>>> DUH!
>>>>> -Stewart is a retard. >>>>> -Stewart does not know what an opinion is. -You like Stewart. >>>>> -Therefore, you must be a retard.
> =O=
> When you speak me address me:
> His Excellency, President for Life, > Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor > Barack Hussein Obama Dada, VC, DSO, > MC, Conqueror of the British Empire
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:09 -0700,znuybvwrote: > > On Oct 28, 1:03 pm, Foxtrot <foxt...@null.com> wrote: > >> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
> >> > "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
> >> >>For instance, a legitimate news organization does not:
> >> >> * Source its research to "conservative blogs."
> >> >And Media Matters isn't a blog?
> >> These are the left wing shills who yesterday implied Rush is a racist > >> while giving Jimmy Carter a free pass for the same thing.
> >> It amuses me how libs are obsessed with Fox, constantly whining about > >> them. But conservatives don't give a wet fart about MSNBC or the other > >> lib mouthpieces. It's lonely at the top! Heheheh
> > FNC is a fair and balanced network. If you want to know what's > > happening in this country; watching FNC and listening to talk radio is a > > must.
> And then you, too, could end up like Foxtrot andznuybv...
>On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:36:09 -0800, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >> wrote ...
>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:37:38 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >>>> wrote ...
>>>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" >>>>>> <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>>>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for a >>>>>>>>>>> brain cell.
>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the link >>>>>>>>>>provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have seen that >>>>>>>>>>every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to say >>>>>>>>>it was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid Drinker.
>>>>>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>>>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who >>>>>>>> resent conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day but >>>>>>>> listen to Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel they can >>>>>>>> twist to discredit conservatives.
>>>>>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>>>>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>>>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell >>>>>>>> mommy!!"
>>>>>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>>>>>disease called Fox.
>>>>>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are the >>>>>> antidotes.
>>>>>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a way >>>>>you're right.
>>>> Media Matters hasn't done anything significant to support their whine >>>> about Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
>>>Then you haven't got a thing to worry about when I post material from >>>them, do you?
>> I don't. I find it fun to point out the idiots who take them for their >> word. You are an easy target to find for supporting Media Matters.
>In that case, you'll be delighted to learn that I plan to keep right on >doing it.
If this was a television show, the director would fade up the song "Send in the Clowns" every time you spoke.
>>>>>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >>>>>> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >>>>>hours >>>>>> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>>>>>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox and >>>>>> Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning America >>>>>> and CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning Joe" and >>>>>> "Morning in America."
>>>>>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you like >>>>>> the article. It's like you. You never say anything substantial.
>>>>>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and >>>>>Stewart did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed >>>>>wall between news and "opiniontainment" is.
>>>> That's it! John Stewart is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
>>>OK. Don't take him seriously then.
>> O don't but idiots like you do. You even gave me a link.
>Which you didn't follow.
I did it follow it. How would I know that Media Matters used itself as a cite.
I did read Stewart's article. It had nothing substantial.
>>>As a famous Republican said, "Why so SERIOUS?"
>> Tell that to the whiners of CNN and MSNBC.
>Go ahead. I don't watch them, either.
I know you don't. You only watch Comedy Central and the Cartoon Channel to get your news.
>>>>>> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of course >>>>>> they are biased. Of course they are."
>>>>>> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
>>>>>> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a >>>>>> particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than >>>>>> impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally >>>>>> held view
>>>>>Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
>>>> And John Stewart is a news critic? He's just a comedian with an >>>> opinion.
>>>Jon Stewart. Practice for a while, and I'm sure you'll get it.
>> You're just a clown with a stupid opinion. At least Stewart is a little >> more sophisticated.
>>>And yes. He's a comedian with an opinion. He'll be the first to tell >>>you so. But you sure are afraid of him.
>>>>>> DUH!
>>>>>> -Stewart is a retard. >>>>>> -Stewart does not know what an opinion is. -You like Stewart. >>>>>> -Therefore, you must be a retard.
######
Q. Why doesn't the Church of Obama Messiah light candles?
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:40:01 -0800, znuybv wrote: > On Oct 30, 4:43 pm, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:09 -0700,znuybvwrote: >> > On Oct 28, 1:03 pm, Foxtrot <foxt...@null.com> wrote: >> >> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>> >> > "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>> >> >>For instance, a legitimate news organization does not:
>> >> >> * Source its research to "conservative blogs."
>> >> >And Media Matters isn't a blog?
>> >> These are the left wing shills who yesterday implied Rush is a >> >> racist while giving Jimmy Carter a free pass for the same thing.
>> >> It amuses me how libs are obsessed with Fox, constantly whining >> >> about them. But conservatives don't give a wet fart about MSNBC or >> >> the other lib mouthpieces. It's lonely at the top! Heheheh
>> > FNC is a fair and balanced network. If you want to know what's >> > happening in this country; watching FNC and listening to talk radio >> > is a must.
>> And then you, too, could end up like Foxtrot andznuybv...
> You should be so lucky.
Yes, life is just so COMPLEX without a Limbotomy...
>>>>>>> For instance, a legitimate news organization does not: >>>>>>> * Source its research to "conservative blogs." >>>>>> And Media Matters isn't a blog?
CNN doesn't source blogs - they hire reporters to go find facts.
Fox sources blogs, because you can write anything on a blog. Zero credibility - like here!
> While bowing before me, "5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> > wrote ...
>>On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:36:09 -0800, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >>> wrote ...
>>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:37:38 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" >>>>> <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" >>>>>>> <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for >>>>>>>>>>>> a brain cell.
>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the >>>>>>>>>>>link provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have >>>>>>>>>>>seen that every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to >>>>>>>>>>say it was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid >>>>>>>>>>Drinker.
>>>>>>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>>>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>>>>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who >>>>>>>>> resent conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day >>>>>>>>> but listen to Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel >>>>>>>>> they can twist to discredit conservatives.
>>>>>>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>>>>>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>>>>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell >>>>>>>>> mommy!!"
>>>>>>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>>>>>>disease called Fox.
>>>>>>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are >>>>>>> the antidotes.
>>>>>>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a >>>>>>way you're right.
>>>>> Media Matters hasn't done anything significant to support their >>>>> whine about Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
>>>>Then you haven't got a thing to worry about when I post material from >>>>them, do you?
>>> I don't. I find it fun to point out the idiots who take them for their >>> word. You are an easy target to find for supporting Media Matters.
>>In that case, you'll be delighted to learn that I plan to keep right on >>doing it.
> If this was a television show, the director would fade up the song "Send > in the Clowns" every time you spoke.
>>>>> He's a comedian. He has not the credentials that say he is an expert >>>>> to comment on news channels.
>>>>Um, since when does anyone need to be an expert to comment on news >>>>channels? Or Faux, for that matter?
>>> The idiots are not prepared to defend their comments. You should know >>> that by now.
>>Something Jon Stewart can do extremely well.
> Stewart did nothing of the sort.
You didn't watch it, did you?
>>So well that all you can do is arm-wave. You STILL haven't refuted >>anything either Media Matters or Jon Stewart said.
> When Media Matters uses itself as a cite, it is guaranteed to be more of > their biased crap. Stewart did do squat. He made lame jokes, that's all.
They don't use themselves as a cite. Maybe you should actually read the article and watch the Stewart clip. You're making a serious fool out of yourself now.
>>>>>>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >>>>>>> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >>>>>>hours >>>>>>> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>>>>>>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox >>>>>>> and Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning >>>>>>> America and CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning >>>>>>> Joe" and "Morning in America."
>>>>>>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you >>>>>>> like the article. It's like you. You never say anything >>>>>>> substantial.
>>>>>>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and >>>>>>Stewart did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed >>>>>>wall between news and "opiniontainment" is.
>>>>> That's it! John Stewart is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
>>>>OK. Don't take him seriously then.
>>> O don't but idiots like you do. You even gave me a link.
>>Which you didn't follow.
> I did it follow it. How would I know that Media Matters used itself as a > cite.
You're lying. What can I say?
> I did read Stewart's article. It had nothing substantial.
>>>>As a famous Republican said, "Why so SERIOUS?"
>>> Tell that to the whiners of CNN and MSNBC.
>>Go ahead. I don't watch them, either.
> I know you don't. You only watch Comedy Central and the Cartoon Channel > to get your news.
If that were true, I would be well ahead of the typical Faux viewer.
>>>>>>> "Do you think Fox News is biased?" he asks rhetorically. "Of >>>>>>> course they are biased. Of course they are."
>>>>>>> Is Stewart a retard? Merriam-Webster defines opinion:
>>>>>>> 1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a >>>>>>> particular matter b : approval, esteem 2 a : belief stronger than >>>>>>> impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally >>>>>>> held view
>>>>>>Uh huh. And Faux likes to pretent it's news isn't opinion.
>>>>> And John Stewart is a news critic? He's just a comedian with an >>>>> opinion.
>>>>Jon Stewart. Practice for a while, and I'm sure you'll get it.
>>> You're just a clown with a stupid opinion. At least Stewart is a >>> little more sophisticated.
>>>>And yes. He's a comedian with an opinion. He'll be the first to tell >>>>you so. But you sure are afraid of him.
>>>>>>> DUH!
>>>>>>> -Stewart is a retard. >>>>>>> -Stewart does not know what an opinion is. -You like Stewart. >>>>>>> -Therefore, you must be a retard.
> ######
> Q. Why doesn't the Church of Obama Messiah light candles?
> A. Obama wants to keep his followers in the dark.
On Nov 2, 5:27 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> For instance, a legitimate news organization does not: > >>>>>>> * Source its research to "conservative blogs." > >>>>>> And Media Matters isn't a blog?
> CNN doesn't source blogs -
. They don't? Then where did they get the racist "quotes" soposedly by Rush Limbaugh. Sniff sniff - oh right, their ass.
On Nov 2, 5:27 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> For instance, a legitimate news organization does not: > >>>>>>> * Source its research to "conservative blogs." > >>>>>> And Media Matters isn't a blog?
> CNN doesn't source blogs - they hire reporters to go find facts.
> Fox sources blogs, because you can write anything on a blog. Zero credibility - > like here!
How did they come up with the 'Tail Wind' story? At least CBS forged documents.
On Nov 2, 7:27 pm, bvallely <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 5:27 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:> >>>>>>> For instance, a legitimate news organization does not: > > >>>>>>> * Source its research to "conservative blogs." > > >>>>>> And Media Matters isn't a blog?
> > CNN doesn't source blogs -
> . > They don't? Then where did they get the racist "quotes" soposedly by > Rush Limbaugh. Sniff sniff - oh right, their ass.
>On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:43:59 -0800, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>> While bowing before me, "5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >> wrote ...
>>>On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:36:09 -0800, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> >>>> wrote ...
>>>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:37:38 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" >>>>>> <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:16:44 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote:
>>>>>>>> While bowing before me, "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" >>>>>>>> <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:50:30 -0700, Foxtrot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Just Call Me B.O. <B...@Prez4Life.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:46:00 -0700, Just Call Me B.O. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thirty reasons without backup is like thirty libs looking for >>>>>>>>>>>>> a brain cell.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they're all backed up. All you had to do was go to the >>>>>>>>>>>>link provided (yes, the one you trimmed) and you would have >>>>>>>>>>>>seen that every one of them was hotlinked).
>>>>>>>>>>>Media Matters use themselves as their cites. Are you going to >>>>>>>>>>>say it was fair and balanced? Pull the other one, Kool Aid >>>>>>>>>>>Drinker.
>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, I mean you can't back them up since you followed their word >>>>>>>>>>>blindly without posting any back up.
>>>>>>>>>> Mediamatters is nothing but a bunch bitter liberal losers who >>>>>>>>>> resent conservatives' success. They have nothing to do all day >>>>>>>>>> but listen to Rush and watch Fox News looking for any morsel >>>>>>>>>> they can twist to discredit conservatives.
>>>>>>>>>> Their website admits their role as petty lurkers: "monitoring, >>>>>>>>>> analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation."
>>>>>>>>>> Their agenda can be summarized as "I'll tell mommy, I'll tell >>>>>>>>>> mommy!!"
>>>>>>>>>Oh, it's not just Media Matters that watches that televised moral >>>>>>>>>disease called Fox.
>>>>>>>> Media Matters is the disease and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are >>>>>>>> the antidotes.
>>>>>>>Well, they're doing a bangup job of marginalizing the GOP, so in a >>>>>>>way you're right.
>>>>>> Media Matters hasn't done anything significant to support their >>>>>> whine about Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
>>>>>Then you haven't got a thing to worry about when I post material from >>>>>them, do you?
>>>> I don't. I find it fun to point out the idiots who take them for their >>>> word. You are an easy target to find for supporting Media Matters.
>>>In that case, you'll be delighted to learn that I plan to keep right on >>>doing it.
>> If this was a television show, the director would fade up the song "Send >> in the Clowns" every time you spoke.
>>>>>> He's a comedian. He has not the credentials that say he is an expert >>>>>> to comment on news channels.
>>>>>Um, since when does anyone need to be an expert to comment on news >>>>>channels? Or Faux, for that matter?
>>>> The idiots are not prepared to defend their comments. You should know >>>> that by now.
>>>Something Jon Stewart can do extremely well.
>> Stewart did nothing of the sort.
>You didn't watch it, did you?
>>>So well that all you can do is arm-wave. You STILL haven't refuted >>>anything either Media Matters or Jon Stewart said.
>> When Media Matters uses itself as a cite, it is guaranteed to be more of >> their biased crap. Stewart did do squat. He made lame jokes, that's all.
>They don't use themselves as a cite. Maybe you should actually read the >article and watch the Stewart clip. You're making a serious fool out of >yourself now.
>>>>>>>> The title of the article is "Fox admits only nine hours a day of >>>>>>>> programming is ?news,? Daily Show notes." That's seven plus more >>>>>>>hours >>>>>>>> than ABC, CBS and NBC.
>>>>>>>> Stewart says, "The three hours you spend in the morning with Fox >>>>>>>> and Friends, not news." How long is the Today Show, Good Morning >>>>>>>> America and CBS Morning Show? It's about the same for "Morning >>>>>>>> Joe" and "Morning in America."
>>>>>>>> Stewart doesn't really say anything substantial. No wonder you >>>>>>>> like the article. It's like you. You never say anything >>>>>>>> substantial.
>>>>>>>Actually, the article mentions what was a 10 minute segment, and >>>>>>>Stewart did a brilliant job of showing what a joke Faux's supposed >>>>>>>wall between news and "opiniontainment" is.
>>>>>> That's it! John Stewart is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
>>>>>OK. Don't take him seriously then.
>>>> O don't but idiots like you do. You even gave me a link.
>>>Which you didn't follow.
>> I did it follow it. How would I know that Media Matters used itself as a >> cite.
>You're lying. What can I say?
You're lying about lying. You said Media Matters referenced their points. Each link pointed to Media Matters.
>> I did read Stewart's article. It had nothing substantial.
>>>>>As a famous Republican said, "Why so SERIOUS?"
>>>> Tell that to the whiners of CNN and MSNBC.
>>>Go ahead. I don't watch them, either.
>> I know you don't. You only watch Comedy Central and the Cartoon Channel >> to get your news.
>If that were true, I would be well ahead of the typical Faux viewer.
You might be ahead of the typical Fox News viewer but that is only at the counter at McDonald's at lunch time.
######
Q. Why doesn't the Church of Obama Messiah light candles?
|
