People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
By Tony Hicks Contra Costa Times
As you know, making a sex tape is a condition of becoming a celebrity. Even for nice religious girls.
According to TMZ.com, Carrie Prejean demanded more than a million dollars during her lawsuit-settlement negotiations with the Miss California USA Pageant, that is, until the lawyer for the pageant showed Carrie an X-rated home video of herself.
The video the lawyer showed Carrie is extremely graphic and has never been released publicly.
TMZ obtained the video months ago but decided not to post it because it was so racy.
In other words, it wasn't that great.
No one is saying who else might've been involved, though TMZ hints the tape only shows Prejean.
Oh ... can't you go blind from that?
TMZ says Prejean essentially walked away with nothing, though the pageant will pay about $100,000 to her lawyers and publicist, which is only a fraction of her bills.
> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
> By Tony Hicks > Contra Costa Times
> As you know, making a sex tape is a condition of becoming a celebrity. > Even for nice religious girls.
> According to TMZ.com, Carrie Prejean demanded more than a million > dollars during her lawsuit-settlement negotiations with the Miss > California USA Pageant, that is, until the lawyer for the pageant > showed Carrie an X-rated home video of herself.
> The video the lawyer showed Carrie is extremely graphic and has never > been released publicly.
> TMZ obtained the video months ago but decided not to post it because > it was so racy.
> In other words, it wasn't that great.
> No one is saying who else might've been involved, though TMZ hints the > tape only shows Prejean.
> TMZ says Prejean essentially walked away with nothing, though the > pageant will pay about $100,000 to her lawyers and publicist, which is > only a fraction of her bills.
> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
> By Tony Hicks > Contra Costa Times
> As you know, making a sex tape is a condition of becoming a celebrity. > Even for nice religious girls.
> According to TMZ.com, Carrie Prejean demanded more than a million > dollars during her lawsuit-settlement negotiations with the Miss > California USA Pageant, that is, until the lawyer for the pageant > showed Carrie an X-rated home video of herself.
> The video the lawyer showed Carrie is extremely graphic and has never > been released publicly.
> TMZ obtained the video months ago but decided not to post it because > it was so racy.
> In other words, it wasn't that great.
> No one is saying who else might've been involved, though TMZ hints the > tape only shows Prejean.
> Oh ... can't you go blind from that?
> TMZ says Prejean essentially walked away with nothing, though the > pageant will pay about $100,000 to her lawyers and publicist, which is > only a fraction of her bills.
>> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
>> By Tony Hicks >> Contra Costa Times
>> As you know, making a sex tape is a condition of becoming a >> celebrity. Even for nice religious girls.
>> According to TMZ.com, Carrie Prejean demanded more than a million >> dollars during her lawsuit-settlement negotiations with the Miss >> California USA Pageant, that is, until the lawyer for the pageant >> showed Carrie an X-rated home video of herself.
>> The video the lawyer showed Carrie is extremely graphic and has never >> been released publicly.
>> TMZ obtained the video months ago but decided not to post it because >> it was so racy.
>> In other words, it wasn't that great.
>> No one is saying who else might've been involved, though TMZ hints >> the tape only shows Prejean.
>> Oh ... can't you go blind from that?
>> TMZ says Prejean essentially walked away with nothing, though the >> pageant will pay about $100,000 to her lawyers and publicist, which >> is only a fraction of her bills.
On Nov 5, 2:53 pm, liberal2 <liberalhe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 9:49 am, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote... > > Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something > > that should make us think it was sick and twisted?? > -- > No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"...
Ultraconservatives never seem to understand their hyprocrisy.
Tom Sr. wrote: > On Nov 5, 2:53 pm, liberal2 <liberalhe...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Nov 5, 9:49 am, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote... >>> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something >>> that should make us think it was sick and twisted?? >> -- >> No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"...
> Ultraconservatives never seem to understand their hyprocrisy.
> -Tom Sr.
Somehow I suspected she had already had sex.... do I care?
On Nov 5, 4:14 pm, Poetic Justice <PoeticJustice@talk-n-dog...com> wrote:
> Tom Sr. wrote: > > On Nov 5, 2:53 pm, liberal2 <liberalhe...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 5, 9:49 am, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote... > >>> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something > >>> that should make us think it was sick and twisted?? > >> -- > >> No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"... > -- > > Ultraconservatives never seem to understand their hyprocrisy. > -- > Somehow I suspected she had already had sex.... do I care?
Thanks for proving as an ultraconservative, you don't understand the hyprocrisy.
<tomswiftsen...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Nov 5, 4:14 pm, Poetic Justice <PoeticJustice@talk-n-dog...com> >wrote: >> Tom Sr. wrote: >> > On Nov 5, 2:53 pm, liberal2 <liberalhe...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> On Nov 5, 9:49 am, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote... >> >>> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something >> >>> that should make us think it was sick and twisted?? >> >> -- >> >> No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"... >> -- >> > Ultraconservatives never seem to understand their hyprocrisy. >> -- >> Somehow I suspected she had already had sex.... do I care?
>Thanks for proving as an ultraconservative, you don't understand the >hyprocrisy.
> -Tom Sr.
More a case of ignoring rather than not understanding.
> "Tom Sr." <tomswiftsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Nov 5, 2:53 pm, liberal2 <liberalhe...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 5, 9:49 am, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote... > >> > Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something > >> > that should make us think it was sick and twisted?? > >> -- > >> No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"...
> >Ultraconservatives never seem to understand their hyprocrisy.
> Ultra-libs never seem to understand that Truth is > not infinitely flexible. :-)
> As for Prejean ... aren't these winners supposed to > represent the kinds of women you'd MOST WANT to > have sex with ? If so, what's all the fuss about > her having sex ??? Seems to fit the theme. Making > the best porno tape oughtta be part of the contest :-)
> 'Hypocricy' though ... maybe too harsh a charge. > Just because someone is anti-abortion or doesn't > think gay marriages are a good idea does NOT > mean they're blue-nosed puro-talibanites. Only > mindless ideologues insist that each and every > opinion one holds MUST fit into one of their > favorite pre-existing ideological frameworks.
> I'm against late-term abortions
Ummmm, so you'd let a fetus kill the pregnant woman? Hmmm, care to adopt an anencephalic child, or just love playing god with other people's lives?
> but 101% in favor > of allowing earlier-term abortions on demand ... > even for minors, even using govt. money for it in > some cases. How does that work ? Am I being > hypocritical ... or am I working from a whole > different perspective on the situation, one > unembraced by the few 'official' ideologies ?
"How it works" is that somewhere in that reichtard brain of yours a decent person is struggling to emerge. Someday you might become human.
>>> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
>> Can someone post the "tape"? I need it for research purposes...
> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something > that should make us think it was sick and twisted??
> Sex with the Pageant judges(all of them)? > Sex with her father, brother, pastor? > Sex with a football team(all at once)?
Let's be serious. The only beauty queen in recent years to maintain a successful career in show business is Vanessa Williams. Williams was fired by Miss America after pictures of Williams with another woman's tongue in Williams' vulva were published by Penthouse magazine.
How many people would even know who Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian are if not for their sex videos?
Who thinks Tommy Lee or Bret Michael would have been given pseudo reality TV shows if they hadn't co-starred with Pam Anderson in sex videos.
>On Nov 5, 9:49Ęam, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n- >dog.com> wrote: >> lab~rat >:-) wrote: >> > On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:44:41 -0500, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> >> > puked:
>> >> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
>> > Can someone post the "tape"? ĘI need it for research purposes...
>> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something >> that should make us think it was sick and twisted??
>No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"...
I thought that she just hated buttfuckers. Or didn't want them to marry. What does that have to do with normal sex? -- lab~rat >:-) Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
> >> >> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
> >> > Can someone post the "tape"? ĘI need it for research purposes...
> >> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something > >> that should make us think it was sick and twisted??
> >No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"...
> I thought that she just hated buttfuckers. Or didn't want them to > marry. What does that have to do with normal sex? > -- > lab~rat >:-) > Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Just curious...what religion frowns on gay marriage but smiles on porno sex performances?
>> >> >> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
>> >> > Can someone post the "tape"? ćI need it for research purposes...
>> >> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something >> >> that should make us think it was sick and twisted??
>> >No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"...
>> I thought that she just hated buttfuckers. ĘOr didn't want them to >> marry. ĘWhat does that have to do with normal sex? >> -- >> lab~rat Ę>:-) >> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
>Just curious...what religion frowns on gay marriage but smiles on >porno sex performances?
Uh, was there a porno sex performance? The reason I'm asking is because no one's seen a tape.
But more directly to the question, I don't know of any religion that mentions pornography directly, maybe scientology?
Regardless, what does that have to do with faggotry? -- lab~rat >:-) Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Constitutional American wrote: > On Nov 6, 6:36 am, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:53:12 -0800 (PST), liberal2 >> <liberalhe...@yahoo.com> puked:
>>> On Nov 5, 9:49Ęam, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n- >>> dog.com> wrote: >>>> lab~rat >:-) wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:44:41 -0500, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> >>>>> puked: >>>>>> http://www.contracostatimes.com/celebrities/ci_13713556 >>>>>> 11/04/2009 >>>>>> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit >>>>> Can someone post the "tape"? ĘI need it for research purposes... >>>> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something >>>> that should make us think it was sick and twisted?? >>> No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"... >> I thought that she just hated buttfuckers. Or didn't want them to >> marry. What does that have to do with normal sex? >> -- >> lab~rat >:-) >> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
> Just curious...what religion frowns on gay marriage but smiles on > porno sex performances?
r wiley wrote: > "Beam Me Up Scotty" <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote in message > news:4af2e5e8$0$23642$ec3e2dad@unlimited.usenetmonster.com... >> lab~rat >:-) wrote: >>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:44:41 -0500, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> >>> puked:
>>>> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit >>> Can someone post the "tape"? I need it for research purposes... >> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something >> that should make us think it was sick and twisted??
>> Sex with the Pageant judges(all of them)? >> Sex with her father, brother, pastor? >> Sex with a football team(all at once)?
> Let's be serious. The only beauty queen in recent years to maintain a successful > career in show business is Vanessa Williams. Williams was fired by Miss America > after pictures of Williams with another woman's tongue in Williams' vulva were published > by Penthouse magazine.
> How many people would even know who Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian are if > not for their sex videos?
Kim Kardashian has a sex video? I wondered Why I saw that name splattered on the TV, I saw zero talent when I was scanning the channels and stopped there once but somehow that person was on my TV screen....
> Who thinks Tommy Lee or Bret Michael would have been given pseudo reality > TV shows if they hadn't co-starred with Pam Anderson in sex videos.
>r wiley wrote: >> "Beam Me Up Scotty" <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote in message >> news:4af2e5e8$0$23642$ec3e2dad@unlimited.usenetmonster.com... >>> lab~rat >:-) wrote: >>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:44:41 -0500, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> >>>> puked:
>>>>> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit >>>> Can someone post the "tape"? I need it for research purposes... >>> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something >>> that should make us think it was sick and twisted??
>>> Sex with the Pageant judges(all of them)? >>> Sex with her father, brother, pastor? >>> Sex with a football team(all at once)?
>> Let's be serious. The only beauty queen in recent years to maintain a successful >> career in show business is Vanessa Williams. Williams was fired by Miss America >> after pictures of Williams with another woman's tongue in Williams' vulva were published >> by Penthouse magazine.
>> How many people would even know who Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian are if >> not for their sex videos?
> Kim Kardashian has a sex video? I wondered Why I saw that name > splattered on the TV, I saw zero talent when I was scanning the channels > and stopped there once but somehow that person was on my TV screen....
>> Who thinks Tommy Lee or Bret Michael would have been given pseudo reality >> TV shows if they hadn't co-starred with Pam Anderson in sex videos.
> OK... now who didn't have a sex video with Pam?
>> rw
I left out Ray-J, Kim Kardashian's sex video costar. VH1 gave him a pseudo reality show.
> >> >> >> People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
> >> >> > Can someone post the "tape"? ćI need it for research purposes...
> >> >> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something > >> >> that should make us think it was sick and twisted??
> >> >No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"...
> >> I thought that she just hated buttfuckers. ĘOr didn't want them to > >> marry. ĘWhat does that have to do with normal sex? > >> -- > >> lab~rat Ę>:-) > >> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
> >Just curious...what religion frowns on gay marriage but smiles on > >porno sex performances?
> Uh, was there a porno sex performance? The reason I'm asking is > because no one's seen a tape.
> But more directly to the question, I don't know of any religion that > mentions pornography directly, maybe scientology?
> Regardless, what does that have to do with faggotry? > -- > lab~rat >:-) > Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Nothing but everything to do with hypocrisy. Seems Miss Family Values has a set of values that need a bit of clarification, doesn't it?
On Nov 5, 2:30 pm, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
> "Tom Sr." <tomswiftsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Nov 5, 2:53 pm, liberal2 <liberalhe...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 5, 9:49 am, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote... > >> > Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something > >> > that should make us think it was sick and twisted?? > >> -- > >> No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"...
> >Ultraconservatives never seem to understand their hyprocrisy.
> Ultra-libs never seem to understand that Truth is > not infinitely flexible. :-)
Non-sequitor, anyone.
> As for Prejean ... aren't these winners supposed to > represent the kinds of women you'd MOST WANT to > have sex with ? If so, what's all the fuss about > her having sex ??? Seems to fit the theme. Making > the best porno tape oughtta be part of the contest :-)
No, the winners are not supposed to represent the kind of woman you'd most want to have sex with. You're thinking of a completely different contest.
> 'Hypocricy' though ... maybe too harsh a charge. > Just because someone is anti-abortion or doesn't > think gay marriages are a good idea does NOT > mean they're blue-nosed puro-talibanites. Only > mindless ideologues insist that each and every > opinion one holds MUST fit into one of their > favorite pre-existing ideological frameworks.
I don't recall her saying that same sex marriages "weren't a good idea". I think I heard the word 'abomination' somewhere along the way actually. She's not a blue-nosed puro-talabanite for being against abortion or same sex marriage; she's a blue-nosed puro-talabanite for insisting that everyone's opinion must fit into her ideological framework.
> I'm against late-term abortions but 101% in favor > of allowing earlier-term abortions on demand ... > even for minors, even using govt. money for it in > some cases. How does that work ? Am I being > hypocritical ... or am I working from a whole > different perspective on the situation, one > unembraced by the few 'official' ideologies ?
Honestly, don't care one iota what you are for or against. But do you understand what the word 'hypocritical' means. hyp⋅o⋅crite: a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements. Of course, now that I read this, Carrie Prejean isn't a hypocrite even though her actions are hypocritical. She actually believes what she says and just acts the opposite of what she says. She's really just an idiot, but no one should be very suprised at that conclusion.
nobody said about: Re: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:53:12 -0800 (PST), liberal2 > <liberalhe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 5, 9:49 am, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n- > >dog.com> wrote:
..........snip
> >> > Can someone post the "tape"? I need it for research purposes...
> >> Sex is common, why is it a problem, was it sex with someone or something > >> that should make us think it was sick and twisted??
> >No, stupid, it was her hypocrisy....you know, "family values"...
> Since the story is likely to be false, do you have a point here?
Why do you Richbuttlickins just make stuff up!? You guys really can't tell reality from your desires!? You guys really can't distinguish the positive from the normitive!?
A legal standoff between Carrie Prejean and Miss California USA officials reportedly ended when a Pageant lawyer played his trump card: a sex tape far more hard-core than the nude pictures which had previously scandalized her – and in which she had the starring role.
After being shown the hardcore home video - in which she apparently engages in a solo sex act - Prejean dropped her million-dollar-plus demands, TMZ.com reports, and bolted from the negotiating table. .....snip
There are dozens of statements about how one should not disparage another, especially when you, yourself, have dirty little secrets. It’s all about being a hypocrite. Ms Carrie Prejean, the former Miss California, found out the hard way that cashing in on your loss by becoming the spokesperson for a movement to deny people equality can backfire and badly. Not only was Ms Prejean’s use of “performance enhancing” breast augmentation revealed, but Ms Prejean ended up in her own sex scandal. ...The suit came to an end when a sex tape involving Ms Prejean surfaced and was aired in court. The revelation has already lost Ms Prejean a major speaking ... ======= Like A Bad Boob Job Leaking Silicon, Carrie Prejean's Sex Tape Will Leak Online Student Operated Press - Robert Paul Reyes - 5 hours ago
Carrie Prejean has accomplished the seemingly impossible: Male homosexuals who`ve never seen a straight p*rn movie, are dying to see the video of the born again hypocrite pleasuring herself.
But fans of p*rn shouldn`t despair, like a bad boob job leaking silicon, the p*rn flick will surface somewhere on the Web. We will get our chance to see Prejean as only her gynecologist and her lovers have seen her.
Maybe Prejean really is an effective evangelist for her faith. It`s appropriate that Prejean`s sex tape is a solo effort, the beauty queen only cares about herself. Just like Sarah Palin, Prejean refused to fulfill her obligations because they interfered with her own dreams and ambtions. ... ======= Carrie Prejean Sex Tape: Literally No Takers Whatsoever hecklerspray - Stuart Heritage - Nov 6, 2009 Because, you see, it turns out that nobody wants to buy the newly unearthed Carrie ... ============= Carrie Prejean Sex Tape: Yours for a Bargain-Bin Price? E! Online ============
Why do you Richbuttlickins just make stuff up!?
- Political Economics:
- Socialism: The government/people own the corporations. - Fascism: The corporations/government own the people.
- Republicans: think the very rich are the backbone of America. - Democrats: think the middle class are the backbone of America.
- Republicans: think Americans deserve 27th in health care. - Democrats: think Americans deserve better.
- Republicans: think health care is mostly about defending profits. - Democrats: think health care is mostly about defending health.
- Republicans: must lie to get people to do right. - Democrats: must be honest to get people to do right.
- Republicans: fear government but not corporations. - Democrats: fear both.
|
