Web Images News Groups Books Scholar Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Pharma and the Cult are scared uh dat (CMEs and mini-Michael Jacksons)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mort Zuckerman  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 3:35 pm
Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme, sci.military.naval, alt.flame.psychiatry
From: Mort Zuckerman <morph...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:35:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 3:35 pm
Subject: Pharma and the Cult are scared uh dat (CMEs and mini-Michael Jacksons)
 To: Durland.f...@yale.edu, A...@columbia.edu, gary_worm...@nymc.edu,
scientificintegr...@ostp.gov, pkrug...@princeton.edu,
Stanley.f...@fiu.edu, emcswee...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
SpinL...@yahoogroups.com, kshep...@calea.org, fitz...@gmail.com,
patrick.fitzger...@usdoj.gov, modelt1...@sbcglobal.net,
jdra...@nejm.org, lett...@courant.com, Jgerberd...@cdc.gov,
michael.c...@po.state.ct.us, conn...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managing-edi...@nytimes.com, news-
t...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, fore...@nytimes.com,
natio...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidcalla...@optonline.net,
t...@hotmail.com, illinoisl...@aol.com, jlen...@courant.com,
tinajgar...@yahoo.com, jhornber...@fff.org, thomas.car...@usdoj.gov,
thomas.r...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georgew...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissioner....@po.state.ct.us, bransfi...@comcast.net,
vtsh...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freethin...@charter.net,
scott.mur...@po.state.ct.us, governor.r...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney.gene...@po.state.ct.us, randall.samb...@usdoj.gov,
Robert.shil...@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harold....@yale.edu, sedmo...@nswbc.org, rrmcgov...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fran...@ucia.gov, dr-ahmadine...@president.ir,
eugenerobin...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmil...@newstimes.com, t...@hotmail.com, rastr...@aol.com,
billcurr...@gmail.com, amcgui...@rms-law.com, rjmur...@aol.com,
paulcraigrobe...@yahoo.com, sidney_blument...@yahoo.com,
criminal.divis...@usdoj.gov, karla.dobin...@usdoj.gov,
christopher.chris...@usdoj.gov, richard.Le...@yale.edu,
harold....@yale.edu, james.phill...@yale.edu, inqu...@aldf.com,
l...@idsociety.org, meganmcar...@theatlantic.com,
bob.dro...@latimes.com

Subject: Pharma and the Cult are scared uh dat (CMEs and mini-Michael
Jacksons)

Date: Nov 4, 2009 5:33 AM

ARTICLE BELOW
=========================

It's true that BigPharma tells MDs what's
a drug, although I had a very hard time
convincing the world that OspA wasn't one.
Many, many people, including the Hartford
Courant's Bill Hathaway - who now works for
Yale -, who I tried to convince that "BigPharma
tells MDs what's a drug and not the other way
around," responded that I was wrong and that
"MDs tell BigPharma what's a drug."

(Which MD has monkeys and clean rooms in
their garages and moonlights in microscopy?)

Also, don't forget about bad behavior
in kids:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAINDAMAGE.htm
If it is your kid and you're a sophisticated
yuppie, the kid is an Indigo:
http://www.indigochild.com/

Otherwise, the kid has this very famous
epidemic called Bipolar.  "Bipolar" means
give them two or more drugs.  Maybe three,
one for the in-between-the-poles times, too.
Plus something to sleep and something
to wake up, like a mini-Michael Jackson.

Now, the vast majority of subjects in this
RealityTV horror story are of course, the
DCF kidnappees, which is why they're kidnapped:
http://www.actionlyme.org/AARON_RUSSO.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRITISH_PSYCHIATRY.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/DCF_FRADUATARDS_SPEAK.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAINDAMAGE.htm
in the experiment called Social Engineering.

The SE agenda is to make sure that no one with
a brain in the head plus creative talent
emerges, because, according to the Protocols
of the Learned Elders of Freemasonry:

"HERE IS NOTHING MORE DANGEROUS THAN PERSONAL INITIATIVE: if it has
genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by
millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct
the education of the GOYIM communities that whenever they come upon a
matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing
impotence. The strain which results from freedom of actions saps the
forces when it meets with the freedom of another. From this collision
arise grave moral shocks, disenchantments, failures. BY ALL THESE
MEANS WE SHALL SO WEAR DOWN THE "GOYIM" THAT THEY WILL BE COMPELLED TO
OFFER US INTERNATIONAL POWER OF A NATURE THAT BY ITS POSITION WILL
ENABLE US WITHOUT ANY VIOLENCE GRADUALLY TO ABSORB ALL THE STATE
FORCES OF THE WORLD AND TO FORM A SUPER-GOVERNMENT."
http://www.aztlan.net/protocols.htm

Scared ^^^ uh dat.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2748614967389038944#
◄ "Most 'judges' and Mormons are Penis-Loving Freemasons"- Bill
Schnoebelen
http://www.viddler.com/explore/babylonfalling/videos/14/
"Freemasons worship penises" - Doc Marquis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAsmyQk3P3c
"Freemasons worship sex/penises" - Leo Zagami.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANooGJj6Ng8&feature=related
"Freemasons are the only enemies of the Catholic Church and
are behind the Vatican II Corruption Conspiracy" -  Fr. Malachi Martin
http://www.viddler.com/explore/babylonfalling/videos/15/  "Freemasons/
Illuminati wants a world religion where we all worship
Lucifer, as do the Freemasons"- Doc Maquis.

The Whorey-Glories provide the bodies:
http://www.actionlyme.org/RAGAGLIA_GRANDJURY_DETAILS.htm
That's why John Rowland was once "the Rising
Star" of the Republican Party.

"The strain which results from freedom of actions saps the forces when
it meets with the freedom of another. From this collision arise grave
moral shocks, disenchantments, failures."

They also provide the Whorey Role Model:
http://www.actionlyme.org/SOCIAL_WORKER_WHORING_STARTS_IN_COLLEGE.htm

You feed a psychopath with flattery.

This is also how one raises one's child,
right??  If you discipline your kid, you're
a monster and a terrible parent.  If you don't
drug your little monster (created by non-discipline)
you're also a bad parent and the kid will be
force-drugged anyway.  Either way, a Golem
is created.

KMDickson
http://www.actionlyme.org

================================

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Aren-t-You-Glad-Your-Docto-by-Martha...
November 1, 2009 at 13:52:27

View Ratings | Rate It
Promoted to Headline (H3) on 11/1/09:
Aren't You Glad Your Doctor Completed Pharma's CMEs?
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
Buzz up!on Yahoo! submit to digg

Tell A Friend
SAVE AS FAVORITE
VIEW FAVORITES

By Martha Rosenberg (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Martha Rosenberg - Writer

Raise your hand if you've breathed a sign of relief seeing your doctor
had a CME certificate next to the medical school diploma on the wall.

Did your doctor pass, Bipolar Disorder: Individualizing Treatment to
Improve Patient Outcomes, Part 2 "taught" by Trisha Suppes, MD, PhD
and offered by CME Outfitters?

Suppes is a Professor in Stanford's Department of Psychiatry and
Behavioral Science and funded by Abbott, AstraZeneca; GlaxoSmithKline,
Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Wyeth, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly,
Shire and four more pharma companies.

Maybe your doctor passed Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine May Be Effective in
Women 24 to 45 Years Old --which sounds like a sales pitch for
Gardasil because it is--which "studies" a Lancet article written by
Nubia Munoz, MD, two Merck employees and other authors.

Sample question: "What was the main conclusion of the current study by
Munoz and colleagues of HPV vaccine among women between the ages of 24
and 45 years?" (Italics CME's) Hint: the answer is in the title.

Upon "completion on this activity" offered by CME giant Medscape--
still available for credit if you hurry--"participants will be able
to: "Specify the currently recommended age range for the
administration of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine" and
"Describe the effects of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine
among women between the ages of 24 and 45 years."

CMEs, continuing medical education courses, are sponsored by pharma,
"taught" by pharma funded specialists and bracketed by pop-up drugs
ads which sometimes occlude the text you're reading. ("Which of the
following manic symptoms are most seriously impacting your bipolar
patients' lives?" asked a disease-baiting ad for Geodon, direct-to-
consumer style, when we looked at a CME.) Yet doctors are required to
sit through the canned message like a time-share presentation and
answer a quiz just to keep their state licenses and sometimes
insurance policies.

In fact the only good thing doctors have to say about CMEs is they are
hard to fail--"second chance" questions pop up if you miss the first
ones; whew!--and they are often free. Why?

CMEs are supposed to be monitored by the Accreditation Council for
Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) but like Standard and Poor's and
Moody's stock ratings funding comes from the client side so buyer
beware.

Last year Bernard Carroll, MD a former chairman of psychiatry at Duke,
challenged the objectivity of a CME Outfitters course called Atypical
Antipsychotics in Major Depressive Disorder: When Current Treatments
Are Not Enough (what are they trying to say?) funded by Seroquel maker
AstraZeneca and taught by disgraced Emory University psychiatrist
Charles Nemeroff, MD who lost his department chairmanship from
unreported pharma income.

Two doses of Seroquel were tested but only the results of one were
"statistically significant," writes Carroll on a blog called Health
Care Renewal. "One of the junior presenters stated very clearly that
there was 'significant improvement in both response and remission with
both doses' of Seroquel. That is a falsification of the scientific
record."

In October AstraZeneca agreed to pay $520 million to settle Seroquel
suits and investigations of "physicians who participated in clinical
trials involving Seroquel," presumably on which safety was
established, and a JAMA article red flags Seroquel's metabolic
proclivities in which studied children gained a pound a week and more.
Yet AstraZeneca still seeks FDA approval to market Seroquel to kids.

Nor did the April 2009 article about Seroquel, Maintenance Treatment
For Patients With Bipolar I Disorder: Results From A North American
Study Of Quetiapine In Combination With Lithium Or Divalproex in the
American Journal of Psychiatry (AJP) by CME presenter Trisha Suppes
fare well.

Why were two-thirds of pre-randomization patients discontinued because
of "lack of therapeutic response, developing an adverse event" and
being lost to follow-up ask Debasish Basu, MD, and Kaustav
Chakraborty, MD from Chandigarh, India in the October AJP? "Could it
be possible that the remaining patients, who did eventually proceed to
the randomization phase, represented a group favorably predisposed to
the quetiapine combination?"

A second letter in the same AJP echoes the methodology questions.
"Only one-third of the patients were selected for maintenance therapy,
which raises the possibility of selection bias," write Bettahalasoor
S. Somashekar, MD, DPM, Ashok Kumar Jainer, MD, MRCP and Wajid Shafi,
MD from Coventry, UK. "In this regard, Healy [David Healy, MD, Cardiff
University professor] stated that company sponsored clinical trials
invariably recruit samples of convenience, which by definition do not
actually sustain extrapolation to normal clinical practice."

Next Page
Similar methodology questions are raised about the "science" behind
Medscape's Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine May Be Effective in Women 24 to 45
Years Old CME in the October 10 Lancet.

Why did Munoz et al exclude women "with pre-existing infections and
women who do not complete the full course of the vaccine," ask six
researchers with US National Cancer Institute. Is this also a sample
of convenience? And why was "infection of 6 month duration or longer"
used as an endpoint for showing a public health cancer benefit asks a
different set of researchers, Stefanie Schenk and Jutta Halbekath from
Berlin--when no "differentiation" between infection and cancer is
given?

Clearly the letter writers need to do their CMEs.

"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent.  That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google