On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
<ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote: >What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?
Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty Army, the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime under the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at him. At least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement officer, so Texas can get in on the act if it wants to.
William Hamblen wrote: > On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch > <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?
> Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty Army, > the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime under > the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at him. At > least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement officer, so Texas > can get in on the act if it wants to.
> Bud
Nope. Strictly a Federal matter as it happened on a Federal reserve. I wonder why Texas Police were even on base? Military personal that are wanted by other then Federal authorities are usually delivered to the gate by Military Police. Also nonmilitary personal(Police) are required to check all weapons at the gate. Kudo's to that Female civilian officer that pumped 4 rounds into the killer and stopped further mayhem. I would guess the dead Police officer also got a shot or two in before being shot to death. Nancy Pelosi will more then likely work to ban any weapons on american soil after this.
> William Hamblen wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch > > <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? > >> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?
> > Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty Army, > > the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime under > > the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at him. At > > least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement officer, so Texas > > can get in on the act if it wants to.
> > Bud
> Nope. Strictly a Federal matter as it happened on a Federal reserve. > I wonder why Texas Police were even on base? Military personal that are > wanted by other then Federal authorities are usually delivered to the > gate by Military Police. Also nonmilitary personal(Police) are required > to check all weapons at the gate. Kudo's to that Female civilian officer > that pumped 4 rounds into the killer and stopped further mayhem. I would > guess the dead Police officer also got a shot or two in before being > shot to death. Nancy Pelosi will more then likely work to ban any > weapons on american soil after this.
Considering his prior statements to various people about what he thought of non-muslims, could this be considered a "hate crime".
> On Nov 6, 9:08 pm, Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org> wrote:
> > William Hamblen wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch > > > <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > >> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? > > >> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?
> > > Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty Army, > > > the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime under > > > the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at him. At > > > least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement officer, so Texas > > > can get in on the act if it wants to.
> > > Bud
> > Nope. Strictly a Federal matter as it happened on a Federal reserve. > > I wonder why Texas Police were even on base? Military personal that are > > wanted by other then Federal authorities are usually delivered to the > > gate by Military Police. Also nonmilitary personal(Police) are required > > to check all weapons at the gate. Kudo's to that Female civilian officer > > that pumped 4 rounds into the killer and stopped further mayhem. I would > > guess the dead Police officer also got a shot or two in before being > > shot to death. Nancy Pelosi will more then likely work to ban any > > weapons on american soil after this.
> Considering his prior statements to various people about what he > thought of non-muslims, could this be considered a "hate crime".
Under civilian law yes, not sure about military proceedings.
> William Hamblen wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch >> <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?
>> Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty Army, >> the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime under >> the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at him. At >> least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement officer, so Texas >> can get in on the act if it wants to.
>> Bud
> Nope. Strictly a Federal matter as it happened on a Federal reserve. > I wonder why Texas Police were even on base? Military personal that are > wanted by other then Federal authorities are usually delivered to the gate > by Military Police. Also nonmilitary personal(Police) are required to > check all weapons at the gate. Kudo's to that Female civilian officer that > pumped 4 rounds into the killer and stopped further mayhem. I would guess > the dead Police officer also got a shot or two in before being shot to > death. Nancy Pelosi will more then likely work to ban any weapons on > american soil after this.
The wingnuts will claim that Pelosi will try . but that is to fool weak muinded dupes who vote republican Nancy Pelosi can't overturn the Bill of Rights
Ray O'Hara wrote: > "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:By4Jm.50855$Db2.45189@edtnps83... >> deemsb...@aol.com wrote: >>> On Nov 6, 2:55 pm, Fred J. McCall <fjmcc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Frogwatch <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in?
>>>> Court Martial.
>>> Can he not request a Federal Court trial?
>>>>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?
>>>> It doesn't matter why he did it. The charge will almost certainly >>>> be multiple counts of murder with special circumstances.
>>> Yep, you gotta figure 13 counts of 1st Degree and 30+ counts of >>> Attempted 1st Degree should be enough.
>> He most certainly is looking at the death penalty. I wonder if he >> will think it was all worth it in the end ...
>> - nilita
> I don't think he expected to survive when he started out yeaterday.
If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a hammock being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine.
Frogwatch wrote: > On Nov 6, 9:08 pm, Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org> wrote: >> William Hamblen wrote: >>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch >>> <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote: >>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >>>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be? >>> Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty Army, >>> the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime under >>> the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at him. At >>> least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement officer, so Texas >>> can get in on the act if it wants to. >>> Bud >> Nope. Strictly a Federal matter as it happened on a Federal reserve. >> I wonder why Texas Police were even on base? Military personal that are >> wanted by other then Federal authorities are usually delivered to the >> gate by Military Police. Also nonmilitary personal(Police) are required >> to check all weapons at the gate. Kudo's to that Female civilian officer >> that pumped 4 rounds into the killer and stopped further mayhem. I would >> guess the dead Police officer also got a shot or two in before being >> shot to death. Nancy Pelosi will more then likely work to ban any >> weapons on american soil after this.
> Considering his prior statements to various people about what he > thought of non-muslims, could this be considered a "hate crime".
Thats a scary thought. They can only give you the death penalty for the murders... But a hate crime... Lord have mercy....
Ray O'Hara wrote: > "Alexander" <Alexan...@thegreat.org> wrote in message > news:7lk344F3dldb5U1@mid.individual.net... >> William Hamblen wrote: >>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch >>> <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >>>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be? >>> Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty Army, >>> the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime under >>> the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at him. At >>> least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement officer, so Texas >>> can get in on the act if it wants to.
>>> Bud >> Nope. Strictly a Federal matter as it happened on a Federal reserve. >> I wonder why Texas Police were even on base? Military personal that are >> wanted by other then Federal authorities are usually delivered to the gate >> by Military Police. Also nonmilitary personal(Police) are required to >> check all weapons at the gate. Kudo's to that Female civilian officer that >> pumped 4 rounds into the killer and stopped further mayhem. I would guess >> the dead Police officer also got a shot or two in before being shot to >> death. Nancy Pelosi will more then likely work to ban any weapons on >> american soil after this.
> The wingnuts will claim that Pelosi will try . > but that is to fool weak muinded dupes who vote republican > Nancy Pelosi can't overturn the Bill of Rights
La N wrote: > Ray O'Hara wrote: >> "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:By4Jm.50855$Db2.45189@edtnps83... >>> deemsb...@aol.com wrote: >>>> On Nov 6, 2:55 pm, Fred J. McCall <fjmcc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Frogwatch <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >>>>> Court Martial.
>>>> Can he not request a Federal Court trial?
>>>>>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be? >>>>> It doesn't matter why he did it. The charge will almost certainly >>>>> be multiple counts of murder with special circumstances.
>>>> Yep, you gotta figure 13 counts of 1st Degree and 30+ counts of >>>> Attempted 1st Degree should be enough. >>> He most certainly is looking at the death penalty. I wonder if he >>> will think it was all worth it in the end ...
>>> - nilita
>> I don't think he expected to survive when he started out yeaterday.
> If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a hammock > being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine.
He is a Muslim. That wine has to be made from Honey. Called Meade. Nasty stuff.
Alexander wrote: > La N wrote: >> Ray O'Hara wrote: >>> "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:By4Jm.50855$Db2.45189@edtnps83... >>>> deemsb...@aol.com wrote: >>>>> On Nov 6, 2:55 pm, Fred J. McCall <fjmcc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Frogwatch <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >>>>>> Court Martial.
>>>>> Can he not request a Federal Court trial?
>>>>>>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be? >>>>>> It doesn't matter why he did it. The charge will almost certainly >>>>>> be multiple counts of murder with special circumstances.
>>>>> Yep, you gotta figure 13 counts of 1st Degree and 30+ counts >>>>> of Attempted 1st Degree should be enough. >>>> He most certainly is looking at the death penalty. I wonder if he >>>> will think it was all worth it in the end ...
>>>> - nilita
>>> I don't think he expected to survive when he started out yeaterday.
>> If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a >> hammock being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine.
> He is a Muslim. That wine has to be made from Honey. Called Meade. > Nasty stuff.
Anyway, it might not even be a fundamentalist Muslim thing. It could be that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of debriefing too many horror stories. Because if the rumours are correct (and usually they aren't) and he was making all sorts of provocative internet postings, then WTF happened to the FBI that they hadn't busted him before now, as allegedly they were tracking his actions. Anyway, he's not talking, and before long he'll be lawyered up and it will be a long time before people know "the truth". A bigger concern, IMHO, is that already overstressed troops have this thrown on them. The short and long term effects of this bloody act will have implications in force morale and capability, not to mention, political ramifications. Obama has the toughest j*b in the world right now. As one commentator put it, "[America] is not a nation at war. It's the troops who are at war." For most Americans these ongoing trials in Iraq and Afghanistan are an abstract concept. For those directly involved, including family members and loved ones, it is getting to be way too much.
La N wrote: > Alexander wrote: >> La N wrote: >>> Ray O'Hara wrote: >>>> "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:By4Jm.50855$Db2.45189@edtnps83... >>>>> deemsb...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>> On Nov 6, 2:55 pm, Fred J. McCall <fjmcc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Frogwatch <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >>>>>>> Court Martial. >>>>>> Can he not request a Federal Court trial?
>>>>>>>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be? >>>>>>> It doesn't matter why he did it. The charge will almost certainly >>>>>>> be multiple counts of murder with special circumstances.
>>>>>> Yep, you gotta figure 13 counts of 1st Degree and 30+ counts >>>>>> of Attempted 1st Degree should be enough. >>>>> He most certainly is looking at the death penalty. I wonder if he >>>>> will think it was all worth it in the end ...
>>>>> - nilita
>>>> I don't think he expected to survive when he started out yeaterday. >>> If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a >>> hammock being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine. >> He is a Muslim. That wine has to be made from Honey. Called Meade. >> Nasty stuff.
> Anyway, it might not even be a fundamentalist Muslim thing. It could be > that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of debriefing too > many horror stories. Because if the rumours are correct (and usually they > aren't) and he was making all sorts of provocative internet postings, then > WTF happened to the FBI that they hadn't busted him before now, as allegedly > they were tracking his actions. Anyway, he's not talking, and before long > he'll be lawyered up and it will be a long time before people know "the > truth". A bigger concern, IMHO, is that already overstressed troops have > this thrown on them. The short and long term effects of this bloody act > will have implications in force morale and capability, not to mention, > political ramifications. Obama has the toughest j*b in the world right now. > As one commentator put it, "[America] is not a nation at war. It's the > troops who are at war." For most Americans these ongoing trials in Iraq and > Afghanistan are an abstract concept. For those directly involved, including > family members and loved ones, it is getting to be way too much.
> - nilita
Well one thing for sure. He is not going to be deployed to the Middle East.
La N wrote: > Anyway, it might not even be a fundamentalist Muslim thing. It could > be that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of > debriefing too many horror stories. Because if the rumours are > correct (and usually they aren't) and he was making all sorts of > provocative internet postings, then WTF happened to the FBI that they > hadn't busted him before now, as allegedly they were tracking his > actions. Anyway, he's not talking, and before long he'll be lawyered > up and it will be a long time before people know "the truth". A > bigger concern, IMHO, is that already overstressed troops have this > thrown on them.
I agree with you on that one! What's anyone seeing a psychiatrist in the military going to think now??? It's tough enough for them in the first place.
People often go into the mental health field due to their own problems, and their training often doesn't resolve them sufficiently. (Been there.)
However, I don't think I've ever heard of a therapist going postal before!
> The short and long term effects of this bloody act > will have implications in force morale and capability, not to mention, > political ramifications. Obama has the toughest j*b in the world > right now. As one commentator put it, "[America] is not a nation at > war. It's the troops who are at war." For most Americans these > ongoing trials in Iraq and Afghanistan are an abstract concept. For > those directly involved, including family members and loved ones, it > is getting to be way too much.
Amen! I honestly don't see how those guys can take it.
Even in Big Mistake Two, when everyone in America was behind it, a lot of people cracked. That's what combat does. I saw an article somewhere on the net, by some psychiatrist immediately post-WWII, saying that about 220 days in combat is all even the strongest person can take. Again, they had everyone in America behind them 100%. Now it's different, though not like Vietnam.
> Even in Big Mistake Two, when everyone in America was behind it, a > lot of people cracked. That's what combat does. I saw an article > somewhere on the net, by some psychiatrist immediately post-WWII, > saying that about 220 days in combat is all even the strongest person > can take. Again, they had everyone in America behind them 100%. Now > it's different, though not like Vietnam.
With Remembrance Day coming up in Canada November 11th, I've been listening much of the day to a CBC Radio documentary featuring people narrating stories/anecdotes/letters/memoirs of people who fought in WWI, WWII, and the Korean War, as well as recollections of family members who suffered the loss of their loved ones. Some, of course, survived ... and everything changed in the family ....
I don't think "we" have seen as many suicides in the Armed Forces as are being experienced in recent years. It's just awful.
> La N wrote: > > Anyway, it might not even be a fundamentalist Muslim thing. It could > > be that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of > > debriefing too many horror stories. Because if the rumours are > > correct (and usually they aren't) and he was making all sorts of > > provocative internet postings, then WTF happened to the FBI that they > > hadn't busted him before now, as allegedly they were tracking his > > actions. Anyway, he's not talking, and before long he'll be lawyered > > up and it will be a long time before people know "the truth". A > > bigger concern, IMHO, is that already overstressed troops have this > > thrown on them.
> I agree with you on that one! What's anyone seeing a psychiatrist > in the military going to think now??? It's tough enough for them in the > first place.
> People often go into the mental health field due to their own > problems, and their training often doesn't resolve them sufficiently. > (Been there.)
> However, I don't think I've ever heard of a therapist going postal > before!
> > The short and long term effects of this bloody act > > will have implications in force morale and capability, not to mention, > > political ramifications. Obama has the toughest j*b in the world > > right now. As one commentator put it, "[America] is not a nation at > > war. It's the troops who are at war." For most Americans these > > ongoing trials in Iraq and Afghanistan are an abstract concept. For > > those directly involved, including family members and loved ones, it > > is getting to be way too much.
> Amen! I honestly don't see how those guys can take it.
> Even in Big Mistake Two, when everyone in America was behind it, a > lot of people cracked. That's what combat does. I saw an article > somewhere on the net, by some psychiatrist immediately post-WWII, saying > that about 220 days in combat is all even the strongest person can take. > Again, they had everyone in America behind them 100%. Now it's > different, though not like Vietnam.
> Dennis
There may be some interesting repercussions over this one.
Rolling Stone has an article on Ft Carson shootings, seems Army had a report that multiple tours really are messing up the troops, especially sending those back without adequate help for PTSD. Not enough shrinks, VA has had that problem for decades. Waiting list locally is 6 months plus.
Usually shrinks see a shrink. Part is did I do the right thing on this case, big part is making sure your head is not going off the deep end dealing with clients. If you don't have enough to take care of the troops, you're not going to have enough to take care of the shrinks. Supposedly had a not too great rating at Walter Reed. Why may or may not ever come out.
Usually something like this happens, shortly somebody else does something similar. Heard there was a case with Marine getting killed just after coming back.
La N wrote: > If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a hammock > being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine.
Do you seriously believe a psychiatrist who is also a major in the US army is that unsophisticated?
-- William Black
"Any number under six"
The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single handed with a quarterstaff.
Fred J. McCall wrote: > "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> : > :Anyway, it might not even be a fundamentalist Muslim thing. It could be > :that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of debriefing too > :many horror stories. > :
> Yeah, he's just a poor, abused baby and it's the evil war's fault.
Well it's certainly not normal behaviour.
What do you suggest?
That's he's an al Quaida sleeper?
-- William Black
"Any number under six"
The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single handed with a quarterstaff.
On Nov 7, 3:19 am, William Black <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> La N wrote: > > If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a hammock > > being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine.
> Do you seriously believe a psychiatrist who is also a major in the US > army is that unsophisticated?
> -- > William Black
> "Any number under six"
> The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of > Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat > single handed with a quarterstaff.
He dressed in Muslim attire before going forward and yelled Allah Akbar before he started shooting. But on the other hand he bought a very expensive gun and gave away his belongings.
> Frogwatch wrote: >> On Nov 6, 9:08 pm, Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org> wrote: >>> William Hamblen wrote: >>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch >>>> <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote: >>>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >>>>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be? >>>> Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty >>>> Army, the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime >>>> under the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at >>>> him. At least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement >>>> officer, so Texas can get in on the act if it wants to. >>>> Bud >>> Nope. Strictly a Federal matter as it happened on a Federal reserve. >>> I wonder why Texas Police were even on base? Military personal that >>> are wanted by other then Federal authorities are usually delivered >>> to the gate by Military Police. Also nonmilitary personal(Police) >>> are required to check all weapons at the gate. Kudo's to that Female >>> civilian officer that pumped 4 rounds into the killer and stopped >>> further mayhem. I would guess the dead Police officer also got a >>> shot or two in before being shot to death. Nancy Pelosi will more >>> then likely work to ban any weapons on american soil after this.
>> Considering his prior statements to various people about what he >> thought of non-muslims, could this be considered a "hate crime".
> Thats a scary thought. They can only give you the death penalty for > the murders... But a hate crime... Lord have mercy....
Of COURSE it was a hate crime.The entire Islam thing is about hate.
All that stuff about PTSD and harassment is BS,just a lame attempt at excusing his behavior. Who harasses a MAJOR?
> > Frogwatch wrote: > >> On Nov 6, 9:08 pm, Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org> wrote: > >>> William Hamblen wrote: > >>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch > >>>> <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote: > >>>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? > >>>>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be? > >>>> Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty > >>>> Army, the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime > >>>> under the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at > >>>> him. At least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement > >>>> officer, so Texas can get in on the act if it wants to. > >>>> Bud > >>> Nope. Strictly a Federal matter as it happened on a Federal reserve. > >>> I wonder why Texas Police were even on base? Military personal that > >>> are wanted by other then Federal authorities are usually delivered > >>> to the gate by Military Police. Also nonmilitary personal(Police) > >>> are required to check all weapons at the gate. Kudo's to that Female > >>> civilian officer that pumped 4 rounds into the killer and stopped > >>> further mayhem. I would guess the dead Police officer also got a > >>> shot or two in before being shot to death. Nancy Pelosi will more > >>> then likely work to ban any weapons on american soil after this.
> >> Considering his prior statements to various people about what he > >> thought of non-muslims, could this be considered a "hate crime".
> > Thats a scary thought. They can only give you the death penalty for > > the murders... But a hate crime... Lord have mercy....
> Of COURSE it was a hate crime.The entire Islam thing is about hate.
> All that stuff about PTSD and harassment is BS,just a lame attempt at > excusing his behavior. Who harasses a MAJOR?
> -- > Jim Yanik > jyanik > at > localnet > dot com
Everyone who sees him as representing the enemy. Born in Alexandria, Va he claimed "Palestinian" as his nationality, got ridden (sic) for being a "camel jockey". Believe it or not officers are just as likely to get joshed as enlisted, you just were never there to hear it.
> La N wrote: >> Alexander wrote: >>> La N wrote: >>>> Ray O'Hara wrote: >>>>> "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:By4Jm.50855$Db2.45189@edtnps83... >>>>>> deemsb...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>> On Nov 6, 2:55 pm, Fred J. McCall <fjmcc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Frogwatch <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in? >>>>>>>> Court Martial. >>>>>>> Can he not request a Federal Court trial?
>>>>>>>>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges >>>>>>>>> be? >>>>>>>> It doesn't matter why he did it. The charge will almost >>>>>>>> certainly be multiple counts of murder with special >>>>>>>> circumstances.
>>>>>>> Yep, you gotta figure 13 counts of 1st Degree and 30+ >>>>>>> counts >>>>>>> of Attempted 1st Degree should be enough. >>>>>> He most certainly is looking at the death penalty. I wonder if >>>>>> he will think it was all worth it in the end ...
>>>>>> - nilita
>>>>> I don't think he expected to survive when he started out >>>>> yeaterday. >>>> If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a >>>> hammock being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine. >>> He is a Muslim. That wine has to be made from Honey. Called Meade. >>> Nasty stuff.
>> Anyway, it might not even be a fundamentalist Muslim thing.
Yeah,you keep telling yourself that.Delude yourself even further.
>> It could >> be that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of >> debriefing too many horror stories. Because if the rumours are >> correct (and usually they aren't) and he was making all sorts of >> provocative internet postings, then WTF happened to the FBI that they >> hadn't busted him before now, as allegedly they were tracking his >> actions. Anyway, he's not talking, and before long he'll be lawyered >> up and it will be a long time before people know "the truth". A >> bigger concern, IMHO, is that already overstressed troops have this >> thrown on them. The short and long term effects of this bloody act >> will have implications in force morale and capability, not to >> mention, political ramifications. Obama has the toughest j*b in the >> world right now.
He ASKED for it.Time he began DOING it and stop politicking. No voting "Present".
>> As one commentator put it, "[America] is not a >> nation at war. It's the troops who are at war." For most Americans >> these ongoing trials in Iraq and Afghanistan are an abstract concept. >> For those directly involved, including family members and loved >> ones, it is getting to be way too much.
>> - nilita
> Well one thing for sure. He is not going to be deployed to the Middle > East.
yeah Nilita,excuse all his radical postings and comments.....
It's NOT PTSD. You don't get that from hearing OTHER peoples experiences.