Web Images News Groups Books Scholar Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Fort Hood shooter
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 274 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Frogwatch  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 10:48 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Frogwatch <ohara...@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 10:48 pm
Subject: Fort Hood shooter
What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in?
If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
William Hamblen  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 11:39 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: William Hamblen <william.hamb...@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:39:21 -0600
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 11:39 pm
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch

<ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in?
>If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?

Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty Army,
the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime under
the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at him.  At
least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement officer, so Texas
can get in on the act if it wants to.

Bud


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
deemsbill@aol.com  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 1:37 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: "deemsb...@aol.com" <deemsb...@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:37:44 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 1:37 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
On Nov 6, 2:55 pm, Fred J. McCall <fjmcc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Frogwatch <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:

> :What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in?

> Court Martial.

   Can he not request a Federal Court trial?

> :If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?

> It doesn't matter why he did it.  The charge will almost certainly be
> multiple counts of murder with special circumstances.

     Yep, you gotta figure 13 counts of 1st Degree and 30+ counts of
Attempted 1st Degree should be enough.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
La N  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:02 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:02:09 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:02 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

He most certainly is looking at the death penalty.  I wonder if he will
think it was all worth it in the end ...

- nilita


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alexander  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:08 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:08:04 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:08 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

William Hamblen wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:48:50 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
> <ohara...@mindspring.com> wrote:

>> What jurisdiction would the shooter be tried in?
>> If he did this for political motives, what might the charges be?

> Ft Hood is a federal reservation and the shooter was active duty Army,
> the shot were active duty Army, mostly, and murder is a crime under
> the UCMJ, so I'd guess that the Army would get first crack at him.  At
> least one of the wounded was a Texas law enforcement officer, so Texas
> can get in on the act if it wants to.

> Bud

Nope. Strictly a Federal matter as it happened on a Federal reserve.
I wonder why Texas Police were even on base? Military personal that are
wanted by other then Federal authorities are usually delivered to the
gate by Military Police. Also nonmilitary personal(Police) are required
to check all weapons at the gate. Kudo's to that Female civilian officer
that pumped 4 rounds into the killer and stopped further mayhem. I would
guess the dead Police officer also got a shot or two in before being
shot to death. Nancy Pelosi will more then likely work to ban any
weapons on american soil after this.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Frogwatch  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:19 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Frogwatch <dboh...@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:19 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
On Nov 6, 9:08 pm, Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org> wrote:

Considering his prior statements to various people about what he
thought of non-muslims, could this be considered a "hate crime".

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David E. Powell  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:21 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: "David E. Powell" <David_Powell3...@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:21:24 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:21 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
On Nov 6, 9:19 pm, Frogwatch <dboh...@mindspring.com> wrote:

Under civilian law yes, not sure about military proceedings.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ray O'Hara  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:24 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:24:24 -0500
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:24 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

"Alexander" <Alexan...@thegreat.org> wrote in message

news:7lk344F3dldb5U1@mid.individual.net...

The wingnuts will claim that Pelosi will try .
but that is to fool weak muinded dupes who vote republican
 Nancy Pelosi can't overturn the Bill of Rights

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ray O'Hara  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:25 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:25:25 -0500
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:25 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

"La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:By4Jm.50855$Db2.45189@edtnps83...

I don't think he expected to survive when he started out yeaterday.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
La N  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:27 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:27:56 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:27 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a hammock
being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alexander  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:51 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:51:51 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:51 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

Thats a scary thought. They can only give you the death penalty for the
murders... But a hate crime... Lord have mercy....

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Don Ocean  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:53 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Don Ocean <oc...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:53:24 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:53 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

You will never convince her of that.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alexander  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:56 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:56:39 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:56 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

He is a Muslim. That wine has to be made from Honey. Called Meade. Nasty
stuff.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
La N  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:37 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:37:54 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:37 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

Anyway, it might not even be a fundamentalist Muslim thing.  It could be
that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of debriefing too
many horror stories.  Because if the rumours are correct (and usually they
aren't) and he was making all sorts of provocative internet postings, then
WTF happened to the FBI that they hadn't busted him before now, as allegedly
they were tracking his actions.  Anyway, he's not talking, and before long
he'll be lawyered up and it will be a long time before people know "the
truth".  A bigger concern, IMHO, is that already overstressed troops have
this thrown on them.  The short and long term effects of this bloody act
will have implications in force morale and capability, not to mention,
political ramifications.  Obama has the toughest j*b in the world right now.
As one commentator put it, "[America] is not a nation at war.  It's the
troops who are at war."  For most Americans these ongoing trials in Iraq and
Afghanistan are an abstract concept.  For those directly involved, including
family members and loved ones, it is getting to be way too much.

- nilita


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alexander  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 9:01 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:01:06 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 9:01 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

Well one thing for sure. He is not going to be deployed to the Middle East.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dennis  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 9:02 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Dennis <tsalagi18NOS...@hotmail.com>
Date: 7 Nov 2009 04:02:17 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 9:02 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

La N wrote:
> Anyway, it might not even be a fundamentalist Muslim thing.  It could
> be that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of
> debriefing too many horror stories.  Because if the rumours are
> correct (and usually they aren't) and he was making all sorts of
> provocative internet postings, then WTF happened to the FBI that they
> hadn't busted him before now, as allegedly they were tracking his
> actions.  Anyway, he's not talking, and before long he'll be lawyered
> up and it will be a long time before people know "the truth".  A
> bigger concern, IMHO, is that already overstressed troops have this
> thrown on them.  

        I agree with you on that one!  What's anyone seeing a psychiatrist
in the military going to think now???  It's tough enough for them in the
first place.  

        People often go into the mental health field due to their own
problems, and their training often doesn't resolve them sufficiently.  
(Been there.)  

        However, I don't think I've ever heard of a therapist going postal
before!  

>  The short and long term effects of this bloody act
> will have implications in force morale and capability, not to mention,
> political ramifications.  Obama has the toughest j*b in the world
> right now. As one commentator put it, "[America] is not a nation at
> war.  It's the troops who are at war."  For most Americans these
> ongoing trials in Iraq and Afghanistan are an abstract concept.  For
> those directly involved, including family members and loved ones, it
> is getting to be way too much.

        Amen!  I honestly don't see how those guys can take it.  

        Even in Big Mistake Two, when everyone in America was behind it, a
lot of people cracked.  That's what combat does.  I saw an article
somewhere on the net, by some psychiatrist immediately post-WWII, saying
that about 220 days in combat is all even the strongest person can take.  
Again, they had everyone in America behind them 100%.  Now it's
different, though not like Vietnam.  

Dennis


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
La N  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 9:41 am
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:41:35 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 9:41 am
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

Dennis wrote:
> La N wrote:

>    Even in Big Mistake Two, when everyone in America was behind it, a
> lot of people cracked.  That's what combat does.  I saw an article
> somewhere on the net, by some psychiatrist immediately post-WWII,
> saying that about 220 days in combat is all even the strongest person
> can take. Again, they had everyone in America behind them 100%.  Now
> it's different, though not like Vietnam.

With Remembrance Day coming up in Canada November 11th, I've been listening
much of the day to a CBC Radio documentary featuring people narrating
stories/anecdotes/letters/memoirs of people who fought in WWI, WWII, and the
Korean War, as well as recollections of family members who suffered the loss
of their loved ones.  Some, of course, survived ... and everything changed
in the family ....

I don't think "we" have seen as many suicides in the Armed Forces as are
being experienced in recent years.  It's just awful.

- nilita


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
frank  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 1:16 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: frank <dhssresearc...@netscape.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 00:16:18 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 1:16 pm
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
On Nov 6, 10:02 pm, Dennis <tsalagi18NOS...@hotmail.com> wrote:

There may be some interesting repercussions over this one.

Rolling Stone has an article on Ft Carson shootings, seems Army had a
report that multiple tours really are messing up the troops,
especially sending those back without adequate help for PTSD. Not
enough shrinks, VA has had that problem for decades. Waiting list
locally is 6 months plus.

Usually shrinks see a shrink. Part is did I do the right thing on this
case, big part is making sure your head is not going off the deep end
dealing with clients. If you don't have enough to take care of the
troops, you're not going to have enough to take care of the shrinks.
Supposedly had a not too great rating at Walter Reed. Why may or may
not ever come out.

Usually something like this happens, shortly somebody else does
something similar. Heard there was a case with Marine getting killed
just after coming back.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
William Black  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 1:19 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: William Black <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:19:22 +0000
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 1:19 pm
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

La N wrote:
> If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a hammock
> being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine.

Do you seriously believe a psychiatrist who is also a major in the US
army is that unsophisticated?

--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
William Black  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 1:23 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: William Black <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:23:47 +0000
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 1:23 pm
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter

Fred J. McCall wrote:
> "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> :
> :Anyway, it might not even be a fundamentalist Muslim thing.  It could be
> :that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of debriefing too
> :many horror stories.  
> :

> Yeah, he's just a poor, abused baby and it's the evil war's fault.  

Well it's certainly not normal behaviour.

What do you suggest?

That's he's an al Quaida sleeper?

--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jack Linthicum  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 3:53 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 3:53 pm
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
On Nov 6, 9:02 pm, "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:

He had  problems with women, those 70 virgins should get ready for
some hard times.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jack Linthicum  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 3:57 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:57:42 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
On Nov 7, 3:19 am, William Black <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

> La N wrote:
> > If things had gone according to plan, about now he'd be lying in a hammock
> > being spoonfed by 72 virgins next to a river of wine.

> Do you seriously believe a psychiatrist who is also a major in the US
> army is that unsophisticated?

> --
> William Black

> "Any number under six"

> The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
> Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
> single handed with a quarterstaff.

He dressed in Muslim attire before going forward and yelled Allah
Akbar before he started shooting. But on the other hand he bought a
very expensive gun and gave away his belongings.

http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2009/11/security-camera-video-shows...


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim Yanik  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 5:38 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:38:15 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 5:38 pm
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org> wrote in
news:7lk5m4F3de0nqU1@mid.individual.net:

Of COURSE it was a hate crime.The entire Islam thing is about hate.

All that stuff about PTSD and harassment is BS,just a lame attempt at
excusing his behavior. Who harasses a MAJOR?

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
localnet
dot com


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jack Linthicum  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 5:41 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:41:19 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 5:41 pm
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
On Nov 7, 7:38 am, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:

Everyone who sees him as representing the enemy. Born in Alexandria,
Va he claimed "Palestinian" as his nationality, got ridden (sic) for
being a "camel jockey". Believe it or not officers are just as likely
to get joshed as enlisted, you just were never there to hear it.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim Yanik  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 5:43 pm
Newsgroups: sci.military.naval
From: Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:43:09 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 5:43 pm
Subject: Re: Fort Hood shooter
Alexander <Alexan...@thegreat.org> wrote in
news:7lk9nvF3dvmknU1@mid.individual.net:

Yeah,you keep telling yourself that.Delude yourself even further.

>> It could
>> be that he is a psychiatrist who cracked under the stress of
>> debriefing too many horror stories.  Because if the rumours are
>> correct (and usually they aren't) and he was making all sorts of
>> provocative internet postings, then WTF happened to the FBI that they
>> hadn't busted him before now, as allegedly they were tracking his
>> actions.  Anyway, he's not talking, and before long he'll be lawyered
>> up and it will be a long time before people know "the truth".  A
>> bigger concern, IMHO, is that already overstressed troops have this
>> thrown on them.  The short and long term effects of this bloody act
>> will have implications in force morale and capability, not to
>> mention, political ramifications.  Obama has the toughest j*b in the
>> world right now.

He ASKED for it.Time he began DOING it and stop politicking.
No voting "Present".

>> As one commentator put it, "[America] is not a
>> nation at war.  It's the troops who are at war."  For most Americans
>> these ongoing trials in Iraq and Afghanistan are an abstract concept.
>>  For those directly involved, including family members and loved
>> ones, it is getting to be way too much.

>> - nilita

> Well one thing for sure. He is not going to be deployed to the Middle
> East.

yeah Nilita,excuse all his radical postings and comments.....

It's NOT PTSD.
You don't get that from hearing OTHER peoples experiences.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
localnet
dot com


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 274   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google