sci.math Google Group

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

t...@little-possums.net (Tim Little) — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:50:23 UT

Specialized hardware for specialized tasks. If you need it, you can
easily get it. If you don't need it, it's a useless waste of silicon
and power across billions of CPUs.
It would be sheer lunacy to fix into mass-market CPUs the designs for
everything that has ever been done in FPGAs. That's why they (and

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

t...@little-possums.net (Tim Little) — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:33:06 UT

IEEE 754 already defines a 128-bit floating point type as a basic
format. There are some CPUs that have worked with 128-bit floating
point types for quite a while, though not many as it is not very
useful. Note that "128-bit floating point pipeline" in modern
graphics cards actually refers to operations on 4x 32-bit floating

Re: Integration and metric space

ba...@yahoo.com (Bacle) — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:28:59 UT

Thanks. What if the homeomorphism was also absolutely continuous.?

Re: Alan Schwartz Jewish science in full-bloom

ba...@yahoo.com (Bacle) — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:25:29 UT

You make it too easy.!. You have repeatedly claimed others' material (material you have pasted from other sites without citing sources) as your own by declaring copyright over said material -- which amounts to theft of intellectual property-- and now you accuse others of intellectual fraud.
In addition, I have docummented every thing else I have claimed above.

Re: Gravity, relativity, and the nature of the hypothesis

macromi...@yahoo.com (BURT) — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:13:40 UT

Gravity is space flow with geometry. This is primary flow. God is
doing gravity.
Mitch Raemsch

Re: Math/CompSci Interview Question - Thoughts?

and...@tomazos.com (Andrew Tomazos) — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:04:54 UT

Oh wait... the (c==0) counts as a comparison. I see it now. Ignore
me.
-Andrew.

Re: Math/CompSci Interview Question - Thoughts?

and...@tomazos.com (Andrew Tomazos) — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:01:55 UT

On Nov 21, 6:29 pm, gwo...@figipc78.tu-graz.ac.at (GJ Woeginger)
wrote:
If I understand your description than it would look like:
int findmode(int* p, int n)
{
int x = p[0];
int c = 1;
for (int i = 1; i < n; i++)
{
if (c == 0)
{
x = p[i];
c = 1;
}

Re: Math/CompSci Interview Question - Thoughts?

and...@tomazos.com (Andrew Tomazos) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:45:15 UT

Dubuque is referring to the solution that Woeginger more lucidly
described above. Both it and the bit counting method are
asymptotically equivalent solutions to the original problem. I'm sure
either of these solutions provided on the spot would have received
"full marks".
I guess what I am curious about is exactly what percentage of, say...

Billiards

mauriziobarb...@aruba.it (Maury Barbato) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:35:25 UT

Hello,
suppose to have a ball on a smooth rectangular billiard
table. When the particle hits the boundary it reflects
from it without loss of speed. I have two questions.
(I) Given a point P on the billiard table, and a
positive integer M, does there exist a trajectory
P(t), with P(0)=P, such that the ball passes again

Re: proof that a + b is unique for any cardinal numbers a,b

ae...@mad.scientist.com (aegis) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:33:19 UT

Instead, I should have said compare
card(A) + card(B) = card(A u B)
and because we are dealing with disjoint sets,
the number of elements in (A u B) are those
in A but not in B, and those in B but not
in A, or card(A\B) + card(B\A) but because
they have no elements in common, that
simplifies to card(A) + card(B). Similarly,

Re: Ten Evidences in favor of my thesis

chazwy...@yahoo.com (chazwin) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:12:53 UT

Spoken like a true virgin!
You need to go out and get laid.
If you want to know why they are holding out on your - just ask!
- You sado!
It must

Re: Gravity, relativity, and the nature of the hypothesis

bradg...@gmail.com (BradGuth) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:11:54 UT

** BROWN-NOSING IS GOOD FOR THE KOSHER SOUL
** BEING A PARROT WITH A BROWN-NOSE IS EVEN BETTER
~ BG

Re: Gravity, relativity, and the nature of the hypothesis

bradg...@gmail.com (BradGuth) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:09:00 UT

This could go on and on, as a perpetual stupidity form of a
cosmological brain fart. Face it, China and their Drops/Dzopa wizards
discovered everything as of thousands of years before, possibly even
before we realized that we had a moon and a seasonal tilt.
~ BG

Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?

hann...@lycos.nl (Hannele) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:58:05 UT

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:39:25 +0100, Tim Miller
I DID NOT!

bijective tetration ?

tommy1...@gmail.com (master1729) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:18:06 UT

is there an analytic bijective tetration known ?
details :
1) bijective from A <-> B where A is the complex plane with real part > -2 and B is the complex plane apart from at most a finite set of complex numbers.
2) analytic on A. (see 1) )
3) with tetration i mean base e tetration with f(-2)= -oo, f(-1) = 0 , f(0) = 1 and f(x+1) = exp(f(x)).