sci.math Google Group

Re: The Impotence Of Mathematics

2009-11-22T02:48:44Z

dood said, Numbertheory;
if you don't want to know that, you don't want to know any thing
in science, vis-a-vu *mathematica* --
not the God-am programme of the Wolframites;
see l'Ouvre, below!
thus:
Lord Berty was quite an evil pacifist (see larouchepub.com), but
he also made me realize that "silly" must be derived from syllogism;

Re: Radioactive decay and the myth of randomness

2009-11-22T02:38:43Z

I've lost the whole plot here. I can't find who said what or anything.

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

2009-11-22T02:37:24Z

The accuracy, independent of any degree of precision, of Calculus is
not questionable from even before Liebniz&|Newton, without the need of
any -- advanced or otherwise -- computational limitations, discovered
it.
Enjo(y)...

Re: Gravity, relativity, and the nature of the hypothesis

2009-11-22T02:37:07Z

Lord Berty was quite an evil pacifist (see larouchepub.com), but
he also made me realize that "silly" must be derived from syllogism;
apparently, he was completely fried by Godel's thing, although
Whitehead would not have been.
thus:
I have always meant to study difference equations, alas. anyway,
I never googol anything that I am dyscussing online,

Re: Radioactive decay and the myth of randomness

2009-11-22T02:34:32Z

But it's another thing to say that a meaning has been given a
non-standard interpretation.

Re: Radioactive decay and the myth of randomness

2009-11-22T02:31:22Z

Those are different signs. We are talking about using the smae sign to
mean something else. which is an impossibility. you can't use the "same"
sign in a non-standard way!

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

2009-11-22T02:30:40Z

in other words,
the engineers didn't get stuck on Stevin's "real" odometer.
--l'Ouvre: [link]
Stop the second cap & trade rip-off;
install a tariff on imported oil -- dumb-*** "republicans R Them!"

Re: Radioactive decay and the myth of randomness

2009-11-22T02:28:52Z

The whole point of the concept of 'non-standard meanings' is that their
signs can be used in two ways - 1) non-meaningfully, and 2) in the case
of mathematics, as an ellipsis for syntactical, meaning-void, procedures.

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

2009-11-22T02:26:37Z

I have always meant to study difference equatoipns, alas. anyway,
I never googol anything that I am dyscussing online,
particualry when using the googol front-end for Usenet
at some public terminal. I recently saw who owned altavista.com, but
I forgot, though I've used it, when needed.
thus:
the original poster had mentioned 754 and 854,

Re: Math/CompSci Interview Question - Thoughts?

2009-11-22T02:25:50Z

These questions/puzzles are to see how you approach the problem, but
if you've seen the puzzle before it is a useless practice.

Re: Math/CompSci Interview Question - Thoughts?

2009-11-22T02:23:53Z

I'll be happy to elaborate if you say what isn't clear to you.
No, I hadn't yet seen Woeginger's post when I posted that. Note
that what one finds "more lucid" may depend on one's background.
A computer scientist might find W's post more lucid, whereas a
mathematician may find the above more to the essence of the matter,

Re: I found this interesting stuff with Riemann's ZF

2009-11-22T02:23:17Z

yea... i think you are right...
for the typo errors... i am sorry i didnt notice i wrote these two at
the same time, 0 < n < 1 and n belongs to N... shit!!!
i actually meant n != 1 n > 0...
in fact i also found some errors... I corrected those and am getting
the following formula...
RZF(n) = n/(n-1) - lim a -> oo ( (1/a) integral _1 ^oo (frac(a/x^(1/

Re: f[z,k]=10z^6 + (-17 - 5Sqrt[5])z^5 + (31 + 11Sqrt[5])z^4 + kz^3 +..

2009-11-22T02:15:36Z

where k is a real number.

f[z,k]=10z^6 + (-17 - 5Sqrt[5])z^5 + (31 + 11Sqrt[5])z^4 + kz^3 +..

2009-11-22T02:14:44Z

f[z,k]=10*z^6 + (-17 - 5*Sqrt[5])*z^5 +
(31 + 11*Sqrt[5])*z^4 +
k*z^3 +
(31 + 11*Sqrt[5])*z^2 +
(-17 - 5*Sqrt[5])*z + 10
where K is a real number.
Show that all roots zj of f[z,k]=0 lie on the unit circle
the complex plane if and only if ____________.
(condition of k)

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

2009-11-22T02:19:47Z

Well, that's mostly because Physics cranks are about
the only people who have ever proclaimed the real number systems
the unique exemplar of exactness.
The educable people, some time started working on DSP,
rather than whip antennas. And today they have HDTV,
Home Broadband, Laser Disks, mp3, mpeg, Blue Ray,

sci.math Google Group

Re: The Impotence Of Mathematics

Re: Radioactive decay and the myth of randomness

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

Re: Gravity, relativity, and the nature of the hypothesis

Re: Radioactive decay and the myth of randomness

Re: Radioactive decay and the myth of randomness

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

Re: Radioactive decay and the myth of randomness

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

Re: Math/CompSci Interview Question - Thoughts?

Re: Math/CompSci Interview Question - Thoughts?

Re: I found this interesting stuff with Riemann's ZF

Re: f[z,k]=10*z^6 + (-17 - 5*Sqrt[5])*z^5 + (31 + 11*Sqrt[5])*z^4 + k*z^3 +..

f[z,k]=10*z^6 + (-17 - 5*Sqrt[5])*z^5 + (31 + 11*Sqrt[5])*z^4 + k*z^3 +..

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

Re: f[z,k]=10z^6 + (-17 - 5Sqrt[5])z^5 + (31 + 11Sqrt[5])z^4 + kz^3 +..

f[z,k]=10z^6 + (-17 - 5Sqrt[5])z^5 + (31 + 11Sqrt[5])z^4 + kz^3 +..