Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Deterministic vs Nondeterministic Turing machines.
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Dmitriy Samsonov  
View profile
 More options Oct 6, 5:53 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: Dmitriy Samsonov <dmitriy.samso...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Oct 6 2008 5:53 pm
Subject: Deterministic vs Nondeterministic Turing machines.
... first of all, is there any generally accepted definition of non-
deterministic Turing Machines? At least I have found almost nothing
usable, including wiki-articles. So I will state my question in the
following form:

Is it true, that there exists ‘probabilistic’-TM, which could not be
simulated with deterministic-TM at all?
Is it true, that there exists ‘probabilistic’-TM, which could not be
simulated effectively with deterministic-TM?
Why negative answer at least on second question could be used as proof
of P!=NP?

If one can give a link, or cite usable definition of non-deterministic
TM, questions should be formulated for non-deterministic TM.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google