> Collectively, the BCS computers, and 60+ more, say the SEC is #1.
Didn't we shut you down on this last week? I have 60+ math friends, too, who can make up formulas to prove what someone pays them to say it proves.
On the field? Over the past 11 BCS years (1998 - 2008), the Pac-10 leads the SEC in H2H matchups, 10-7 (.588). I have no idea exactly what has happened this year, although I know UCLA beat Tennessee and LSU beat UW.
> > Collectively, the BCS computers, and 60+ more, say the SEC is #1.
> Didn't we shut you down on this last week? I have 60+ math friends, > too, who can make up formulas to prove what someone pays them to say > it proves.
> On the field? Over the past 11 BCS years (1998 - 2008), the Pac-10 > leads the SEC in H2H matchups, 10-7 (.588). I have no idea exactly > what has happened this year, although I know UCLA beat Tennessee and > LSU beat UW.
Okay, and Georgia beat ASU, so ... it's 11-9, Pac-10.
> > > Collectively, the BCS computers, and 60+ more, say the SEC is #1.
> > Didn't we shut you down on this last week? I have 60+ math friends, > > too, who can make up formulas to prove what someone pays them to say > > it proves.
> > On the field? Over the past 11 BCS years (1998 - 2008), the Pac-10 > > leads the SEC in H2H matchups, 10-7 (.588). I have no idea exactly > > what has happened this year, although I know UCLA beat Tennessee and > > LSU beat UW.
> Okay, and Georgia beat ASU, so ... it's 11-9, Pac-10.
Georgia barely beat an ASU team that SDDD for the second year in a row, an ASU team that is headed towards an 8th place finish in the Pac-10 with upcoming probable losses against U$C, Oregon, and UofA remaining, and only an iffy chance at a win against UCLA in LA.
> > Collectively, the BCS computers, and 60+ more, say the SEC is #1.
> Didn't we shut you down on this last week?
No, you made a complete fool of yourself by invoking "60 pac-10 math friends" or something, which hopefully you x-no'd so that future generations won't see how dumb you were.
|
