On Nov 7, 12:16 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote:
> John Rogers wrote, On 11/7/09 2:34 AM:
> > If the Obama's are using them for their own political ends? > Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. > But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency."
I agree, really. The right should not sink to the same level as the left.
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:19:00 -0500, John Rogers wrote... > >Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. > >But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency."
> OK... sounds reasonable.
> But the lib/progressives sure didn't believe that when a couple of > Bush kids in college behaved... you know... like college kids.
Are Obama's children basking in the spotlight like Jenna and Barbara Bush did, or are you yet again drawing a false (dishonest) parallel?
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:20:11 -0800 (PST), Tom Enright wrote... > On Nov 7, 12:16 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: > > John Rogers wrote, On 11/7/09 2:34 AM:
> > > If the Obama's are using them for their own political ends?
> > Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. > > But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency."
> I agree, really. The right should not sink to the same level as the > left.
On Nov 7, 4:22 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:19:00 -0500, John Rogers wrote... > > >Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. > > >But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency."
> > OK... sounds reasonable.
> > But the lib/progressives sure didn't believe that when a couple of > > Bush kids in college behaved... you know... like college kids.
> Are Obama's children basking in the spotlight like Jenna and Barbara > Bush did, or are you yet again drawing a false (dishonest) parallel?
Well put, sir. Except, you misspelled "basking in the spotlight, margaritas in hand."
Hey, Huck Kennedy <tempeh...@gmail.com>... keep the change, you filthy animal.
>On Nov 7, 4:22 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:19:00 -0500, John Rogers wrote... >> > >Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. >> > >But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency."
>> > OK... sounds reasonable.
>> > But the lib/progressives sure didn't believe that when a couple of >> > Bush kids in college behaved... you know... like college kids.
>> Are Obama's children basking in the spotlight like Jenna and Barbara >> Bush did, or are you yet again drawing a false (dishonest) parallel?
> Well put, sir. Except, you misspelled "basking in the spotlight, >margaritas in hand."
Yeah, cuz going out to a bar and having a drink as a college student is "basking in the spotlight".
I was one top-notch basker in my day.
John M. Rogers AU Class of 1985 The Al Del Greco of Atlanta
On Nov 7, 6:22 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Are Obama's children basking in the spotlight like Jenna and Barbara > Bush did, or are you yet again drawing a false (dishonest) parallel?
I saw Jenna on the Leno show the other night. She wasn't "basking in the spotlight" of her celebrity, she was there because she ... um, she talked being married, she talked about ... there were no movies involved, there wasn't a family tragedy ... she was there because ...
damn. Not much to go on other than she's the former president's daughter.
But in her defense, she questioned her mom in the "10 at 10" questions because her mom ... well, is her mom and don't all moms get to go on Leno?
> Hey, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc>... keep the change, you filthy > animal.
>> John Rogers wrote, On 11/7/09 2:34 AM: >>> If the Obama's are using them for their own political ends? >> Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. >> But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency."
> OK... sounds reasonable.
> But the lib/progressives sure didn't believe that when a couple of > Bush kids in college behaved... you know... like college kids.
> Hey, Huck Kennedy <tempeh...@gmail.com>... keep the change, you filthy > animal.
> >On Nov 7, 4:22 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:19:00 -0500, John Rogers wrote... > >> > >Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. > >> > >But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency."
> >> > OK... sounds reasonable.
> >> > But the lib/progressives sure didn't believe that when a couple of > >> > Bush kids in college behaved... you know... like college kids.
> >> Are Obama's children basking in the spotlight like Jenna and Barbara > >> Bush did, or are you yet again drawing a false (dishonest) parallel?
> > Well put, sir. Except, you misspelled "basking in the spotlight, > >margaritas in hand."
> Yeah, cuz going out to a bar and having a drink as a college student > is "basking in the spotlight".
Oh deer, sorry, I appear to have made a spelling mistake my own dam self. That should be, "under legal age and defiantly basking in the spotlight, margaritas in hand."
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:33:42 -0500, John Rogers wrote... > >> > But the lib/progressives sure didn't believe that when a couple of > >> > Bush kids in college behaved... you know... like college kids.
> >> Are Obama's children basking in the spotlight like Jenna and Barbara > >> Bush did, or are you yet again drawing a false (dishonest) parallel?
> > Well put, sir. Except, you misspelled "basking in the spotlight, > >margaritas in hand."
> Yeah, cuz going out to a bar and having a drink as a college student > is "basking in the spotlight".
> I was one top-notch basker in my day.
Do you seriously think you're kidding anyone with this nonsense?
"...in the winter of 2003, she decided to become involved in the 2004 campaign.[7] In response to this decision, she made media appearances during the summer of 2004 prior to the election. She and her sister made several joint public appearances, including giving a speech to the Republican Convention on August 31, 2004.[8] She made headlines when she was found sticking her tongue out to media photographers at a campaign stop in St. Louis.[9] Jenna and Barbara took turns traveling to swing states with their father and also gave a seven-page interview and photo shoot in Vogue.[4] The media also extensively covered the campaigning of John Kerry's daughters Vanessa and Alexandra, making the "battle of the daughters" a human interest element of the campaign."
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:33:42 -0500, John Rogers wrote... > Yeah, cuz going out to a bar and having a drink as a college student > is "basking in the spotlight".
Ellen: The Ellen DeGeneres Show (2 episodes, 2007-2008) The Tonight Show with Jay Leno (2 episodes, 2007-2008) Access Hollywood (1 episode, 2008) Larry King Live (3 episodes, 2007-2008) Entertainment Tonight (1 episode, 2008) Rachael Ray (1 episode, 2007)
On Nov 7, 5:20 pm, Tom Enright <freddy_ha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 12:16 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote:
> > John Rogers wrote, On 11/7/09 2:34 AM:
> > > If the Obama's are using them for their own political ends? > > Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. > > But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency."
> I agree, really. The right should not sink to the same level as the > left.
Rush Limbaugh -Chelsea is the Family dog John McCain -"why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno".
> On Nov 7, 5:20 pm, Tom Enright <freddy_ha...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Nov 7, 12:16 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote:
>>> John Rogers wrote, On 11/7/09 2:34 AM: >>>> If the Obama's are using them for their own political ends? >>> Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. >>> But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency." >> I agree, really. The right should not sink to the same level as the >> left.
> Rush Limbaugh -Chelsea is the Family dog > John McCain -"why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is > Janet Reno".
> > On Nov 7, 5:20 pm, Tom Enright <freddy_ha...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 7, 12:16 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote:
> >>> John Rogers wrote, On 11/7/09 2:34 AM: > >>>> If the Obama's are using them for their own political ends? > >>> Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. > >>> But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency." > >> I agree, really. The right should not sink to the same level as the > >> left.
> > Rush Limbaugh -Chelsea is the Family dog > > John McCain -"why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is > > Janet Reno".
> They're not really conservatives!
Well, if anyone on the left has ever stooped to that low of a level in regards to children of presidents as those two "non-conservatives" I'd like to see Enright's proof. Of course my post was his exit stage left from this conversation so we'll never know.
>On Nov 7, 5:56 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >> Dan Bretta wrote, On 11/7/09 5:49 PM:
>> > On Nov 7, 5:20 pm, Tom Enright <freddy_ha...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> On Nov 7, 12:16 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote:
>> >>> John Rogers wrote, On 11/7/09 2:34 AM: >> >>>> If the Obama's are using them for their own political ends? >> >>> Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. >> >>> But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency." >> >> I agree, really. The right should not sink to the same level as the >> >> left.
>> > Rush Limbaugh -Chelsea is the Family dog >> > John McCain -"why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is >> > Janet Reno".
>> They're not really conservatives!
>Well, if anyone on the left has ever stooped to that low of a level in >regards to children of presidents as those two "non-conservatives" I'd >like to see Enright's proof. Of course my post was his exit stage >left from this conversation so we'll never know.
I still laugh a lot when you idots roll out John McCain as a conservative.
John M. Rogers AU Class of 1985 The Al Del Greco of Atlanta
> Hey, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com>... keep the change, you filthy > animal.
>>On Nov 7, 5:56 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >>> Dan Bretta wrote, On 11/7/09 5:49 PM:
>>> > On Nov 7, 5:20 pm, Tom Enright <freddy_ha...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >> On Nov 7, 12:16 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote:
>>> >>> John Rogers wrote, On 11/7/09 2:34 AM: >>> >>>> If the Obama's are using them for their own political ends? >>> >>> Right. If you want to criticize the Obamas for that, fine. >>> >>> But leave the kids out of it. It's called "human decency." >>> >> I agree, really. The right should not sink to the same level as the >>> >> left.
>>> > Rush Limbaugh -Chelsea is the Family dog >>> > John McCain -"why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is >>> > Janet Reno".
>>> They're not really conservatives!
>>Well, if anyone on the left has ever stooped to that low of a level in >>regards to children of presidents as those two "non-conservatives" I'd >>like to see Enright's proof. Of course my post was his exit stage >>left from this conversation so we'll never know.
> I still laugh a lot when you idots roll out John McCain as a > conservative.
And everyone else laughs when you RINO types try to pretend he isn't.
|
