...how chaotic would the top 10 be if the SEC officials hadn't made those ridiculous mistakes in the games that Alabama and Florida each deserved to lose by any legitimate measure?
On Nov 7, 6:34 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ...how chaotic would the top 10 be if the SEC officials hadn't made > those ridiculous mistakes in the games that Alabama and Florida each > deserved to lose by any legitimate measure?
> 1. Texas > 2. Cinci > 3. TCU > ...?
> Heh.
Don't be silly, the SEC is the most dominant conference evah and for- evah ... just ask them!
Hey, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com>... keep the change, you filthy animal.
>...how chaotic would the top 10 be if the SEC officials hadn't made >those ridiculous mistakes in the games that Alabama and Florida each >deserved to lose by any legitimate measure?
You must have missed that VT/ECU game.
John M. Rogers AU Class of 1985 The Al Del Greco of Atlanta
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:48:30 -0500, John Rogers wrote... > Hey, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com>... keep the change, > you filthy animal.
> >...how chaotic would the top 10 be if the SEC officials hadn't made > >those ridiculous mistakes in the games that Alabama and Florida each > >deserved to lose by any legitimate measure?
> You must have missed that VT/ECU game.
I slept through the first three-plus quarters... fell asleep on the couch. Are you maintaining that ECU got hosed?
(Even if that's true, what would it have to do with the SEC refs?)
On Nov 7, 6:34 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ...how chaotic would the top 10 be if the SEC officials hadn't made > those ridiculous mistakes in the games that Alabama and Florida each > deserved to lose by any legitimate measure?
> 1. Texas > 2. Cinci > 3. TCU > ...?
> Heh.
oh jesus...you are so full of ****.....
I dont even know wtf you are talking about in the bama-tenn game? As for the fl-arky personal foul, thats one bad call. it didnt result or prevent an immediate touchdown....
as usual, its wah wah wah wah all the time with you....
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:50:43 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > On Nov 7, 6:34 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > ...how chaotic would the top 10 be if the SEC officials hadn't made > > those ridiculous mistakes in the games that Alabama and Florida each > > deserved to lose by any legitimate measure?
> > 1. Texas > > 2. Cinci > > 3. TCU > > ...?
> > Heh.
> oh jesus...you are so full of ****.....
I am not full of asterisks. You take that back.
> I dont even know wtf you are talking about in the bama-tenn game?
In that case, you should be silent. Your validation of a point is either an insult or indication that a person is wrong, therefore it really doesn't interest me one way or the other, boy.
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:50:43 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > On Nov 7, 6:34 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > ...how chaotic would the top 10 be if the SEC officials hadn't made > > > those ridiculous mistakes in the games that Alabama and Florida each > > > deserved to lose by any legitimate measure?
> > I dont even know wtf you are talking about in the bama-tenn game?
> In that case, you should be silent.
I watched the whole game. I just dont focus 99% on identifying official calls I dont like/disapprove of and 1% on everything else. so yeah, I dont have your....ummmm...unique qualifications in that respect.
College football is great. Officials are human. Dont agonize/bitch about every penalty or non penalty. You will enjoy it a lot more.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:07:25 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > > I dont even know wtf you are talking about in the bama-tenn game?
> > In that case, you should be silent. Your validation of a point is > either an insult or indication that a person is wrong, therefore it > really doesn't interest me one way or the other, boy. > I watched the whole game
Clearly not. Hush now, son. There's some football on ABC. Watch as closely as you can, you just might learn something.
On Nov 7, 9:09 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:07:25 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > > > I dont even know wtf you are talking about in the bama-tenn game?
> > > In that case, you should be silent. Your validation of a point is > > either an insult or indication that a person is wrong, therefore it > > really doesn't interest me one way or the other, boy. > > I watched the whole game
> Clearly not
sure I did.....I understand their were gripes about penalty calls in the florida-arkansas game(although one or two penalties that didnt result in or prevent direct td's can hardly be said to "decide" a game).....and in the ga-lsu game with the celebration penalities....but the bama-tenn game didnt have the same uproar or official sec statements on officials..........
you're just a whiner. You whine all the damn time. About calls every single week.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:12:26 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > > > In that case, you should be silent. Your validation of a point is > > > either an insult or indication that a person is wrong, therefore it > > > really doesn't interest me one way or the other, boy. > > > I watched the whole game
On Nov 7, 9:13 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:12:26 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > > > > In that case, you should be silent. Your validation of a point is > > > > either an insult or indication that a person is wrong, therefore it > > > > really doesn't interest me one way or the other, boy. > > > > I watched the whole game
> > > Clearly not
> > sure I did
> Clearly not.
so where was the uproar? I don't even know wtf you are taking about? But then again like I said, I don't watch college football games for the purpose of exclusively analyzing ref calls....to me thats not the most exciting/interesting part of the games douche....
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:17:51 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > > > > I watched the whole game
> > > > Clearly not
> > > sure I did
> > Clearly not.
> so where was the uproar? I don't even know wtf you are taking about? > But then again like I said, I don't watch college football games for > the purpose of exclusively analyzing ref calls....to me thats not the > most exciting/interesting part of the games douche....
Nope, you watch games involving your own team, rooting against them because you've placed a wager against them. Keep digging, boy.
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:17:51 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > > > > > I watched the whole game
> > > > > Clearly not
> > > > sure I did
> > > Clearly not.
> > so where was the uproar? I don't even know wtf you are taking about? > > But then again like I said, I don't watch college football games for > > the purpose of exclusively analyzing ref calls....to me thats not the > > most exciting/interesting part of the games douche....
> Nope, you watch games involving your own team, rooting against them > because you've placed a wager against them. Keep digging, boy.
failure to respond to my question/point noted....
but really(for your own sake)....watch the games, enjoy the games. You'll be better off. Maybe if you shifted(in non vt games) from like a 99% officiating commentary to a 1% football interest/enjoyment, you wouldnt be so bitter on rsfc every week.......just a crazy thought.
And Im not a bama or lsu fan. And I didnt bet the game.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:47:05 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > On Nov 7, 9:28 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:17:51 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > > > > > > I watched the whole game
> > > > > > Clearly not
> > > > > sure I did
> > > > Clearly not.
> > > so where was the uproar? I don't even know wtf you are taking about? > > > But then again like I said, I don't watch college football games for > > > the purpose of exclusively analyzing ref calls....to me thats not the > > > most exciting/interesting part of the games douche....
> > Nope, you watch games involving your own team, rooting against them > > because you've placed a wager against them. Keep digging, boy.
> failure to respond to my question/point noted....
What you note is irrelevant, and you rarely if ever have a point.
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:47:05 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > On Nov 7, 9:28 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:17:51 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > > > > > > > I watched the whole game
> > > > > > > Clearly not
> > > > > > sure I did
> > > > > Clearly not.
> > > > so where was the uproar? I don't even know wtf you are taking about? > > > > But then again like I said, I don't watch college football games for > > > > the purpose of exclusively analyzing ref calls....to me thats not the > > > > most exciting/interesting part of the games douche....
> > > Nope, you watch games involving your own team, rooting against them > > > because you've placed a wager against them. Keep digging, boy.
> > failure to respond to my question/point noted....
> What you note is irrelevant, and you rarely if ever have a point.
well rarely if ever is almost certainly better than "absolutely never" :)
but in all seriousness, in the bama-tenn game, what questionable call are you even talking about?
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:25:28 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > but in all seriousness, in the bama-tenn game, what questionable call > are you even talking about?
There were multiple, including Ingram's fumble which was erroneously nullified by an official's mistake.
On Nov 7, 10:31 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:25:28 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > but in all seriousness, in the bama-tenn game, what questionable call > > are you even talking about?
> There were multiple, including Ingram's fumble which was erroneously > nullified by an official's mistake.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:57:51 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > On Nov 7, 10:31 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:25:28 -0800 (PST), mianderson wrote... > > > but in all seriousness, in the bama-tenn game, what questionable call > > > are you even talking about?
> > There were multiple, including Ingram's fumble which was erroneously > > nullified by an official's mistake.
> wah wah wah wah......
It's kind of you to translate your usual non-sensical reply into its true meaning, but not everyone wishes to read you as Bellomy does.
|
