"ramashiva" <ramash
...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
...
Please note I am responding to both Pepe and Mark in this post.
On Nov 1, 5:39 pm, Mark Doubt <markdo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 1, 3:53 pm, Pepe Papon <hitmeis
...@mindspring.dot.com.invalid>
> > On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:54:44 -0700 (PDT), ramashiva
> > <ramash
...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > >On Nov 1, 12:38 am, "BillB" <bo
...@shaw1.ca> wrote:
> > >> I don't want to talk to him anymore either. I just wanted to get my
> > >> last licks in because of his dishonesty the other night in refusing
> > >> to
> > >> admit he didn't have the case law citations he had been claiming for
> > >> days he had. I asked him three times, politely, and he deliberately
> > >> ignored me rather than admitting he had been wrong or had lied. This
> > >> latest stalking ramashiva episode is just icing on the cake.
> > >> The only reason I don't want to bet is I don't like the rule about
> > >> responding to someone else in a sub-thread in which he has
> > >> participated. That's just the type of thing I'd do by accident.
> > >Bill, the rule is not that complicated. You do not respond directly
> > >to any of Beldin's posts. You do not respond directly to any post
> > >which is a direct response to a Beldin post.
> > >It is still possible to talk about Beldin in a thread in which he is
> > >active. Just find a post by another poster which is not a direct
> > >response to a Beldin post. Look at how Alim and I did it for an
> > >example.
> > >Talking about Beldin while ignoring him infuriates Beldin more than
> > >anything. He trys to inject himself in the conversation, but he just
> > >gets ignored. Meanwhile, the prop bet participants continue to
> > >discuss Beldin's idiocies while ignoring him completely.
> > >Try it. You'll like it.
> > If the goal is to get rid of Beldim, this doesn't seem to be a
> > strategy that's likely to work. This was, Beldin still gets the
> > attention he craves,
No he does not. He gets totally ignored. He gets talked about as
though he is not even there. When he attempts to break into the
conversation, he gets totally ignored. This totally tilts him. He
starts shotgunning posts into the thread, trying to get a response.
He gets no response. His existence is not acknowledged. This tilts
him even more. When Beldin goes on total tilt, he is no longer a
source of total irritation, he is a source of total amusement.
***
Except, of course, I never tilt
This worked quite well during the last Ignore Prop Bet with Beldin as
the Ignoree. Surely you must remember that.
> > and it encourages him to reply.
Fine. His replies are ignored, which totally tilts him.
> > The only way to truly discourage him would be Total Ignore.
100% false. The ignore prop bet with conversation about Beldin
allowed is even more effective. I am the master of this. You know
nothing about these matters.
If you want to totally ignore Beldin, that's fine with me. You can
join the Ignore Prop Bet and still do that. You are not required to
join in conversations about Beldin. That activity is optional.
As I already told you, if you join the Ignore Prop Bet or totally
ignore Beldin, you will retain my respect. If you continue to reply
to Beldin, I will lose all respect for you. You will have shown
yourself to be a mental weakling with no will power or self control.
> Paul.... or should I call you Seth..... or should I just say Mark.....
> Couldn't agree more!! Since I'm you I feel I can say you are exactly
> right, complete ignore, none of this talk in a round about way
> stuff.... either do it or not, if you talk about him in a round about
> way it's the same as talking to him.....
No it is not. It is like having a conversation about another person
in the real world with a friend. The person you are talking about
happens to walk by, and he hears you are talking about him, so he
walks up and tries to join the conversation. You and your friend
continue to talk about the ignoree as though he is not even there.
You do not look at him, nor do you respond to anything he says. You
don't think the ignoree will be completely infuriated???
***
In real life, sure
Here, they just laugh at your stupidity.
***
Were you around under some identity when the last Ignore Prop Bet was
in effect? This worked to great effect. The purpose of talking about
Beldin in threads in which he is active is to totally tilt him. Which
it does. He starts shotgunning one post after another into the thread
attempting to get a response. He gets no response, which of course,
further tilts him.
***
Willie falls in love with his own idiotic theories.
He's a moron like that.
***
Look. If you don't want to join the Ignore Prop Bet with Beldin as
the Ignoree that's fine. If you want to totally ignore him, that's
fine too.
But look. The bets that Alim and I make between ourselves are our
business. You are out of line telling us what we are doing is not
effective. It's none of your business. And this type of Ignore Prop
Bet is quite effective. It has been field tested with Beldin, and it
totally tilts him.
When Beldin is totally tilted, he is no longer a source of total
irritation. He is a source of total amusement.
***
He must have these idiotic pronouncements on macro
|
