Will in New Haven <bill.re...@taylorandfrancis.com> wrote:
>On Nov 1, 2:51 pm, Jack Tingle <wjtin...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Louann Miller wrote: >> > Your father was a hamster, your mother smelt of elderberries, etc. Bored >> > now. Mind the gap.
>> English much?
>In a thread that began "The question that torn the theory of >evolution." which isn't even _language_ it seems silly to object to a >literary reference, even one that is gramattically irregular.
Much less three (or more) references in a row.
Dave -- \/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK> http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
> On Nov 1, 2:51 pm, Jack Tingle <wjtin...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Louann Miller wrote: >>> Your father was a hamster, your mother smelt of elderberries, etc. Bored >>> now. Mind the gap. >> English much?
> In a thread that began "The question that torn the theory of > evolution." which isn't even _language_ it seems silly to object to a > literary reference, even one that is gramattically irregular.
So we should address the original poster's actual content? BOGGLE!
> Will in New Haven wrote: >> On Nov 1, 2:51 pm, Jack Tingle <wjtin...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> Louann Miller wrote: >>>> Your father was a hamster, your mother smelt of elderberries, etc. >>>> Bored now. Mind the gap. >>> English much?
>> In a thread that began "The question that torn the theory of >> evolution." which isn't even _language_ it seems silly to object to a >> literary reference, even one that is gramattically irregular.
> So we should address the original poster's actual content? BOGGLE!
There was content?
cd -- The difference between immorality and immortality is "T". I like Earl Grey.
>Carl Dershem <ders...@cox.net> wrote: >>1) Learn grammar and spelling if you want to make in impression.
>>2) Study biochemistry if you want to actuially learn something.
>I'm convinced that there's a conservation law relating to >spelling flames on the internet.
Yes, it grew out of Usenet Rule # -6 .
(Not to be confused with Usenet Rule #6, of course.)
Dave "interestingly, Google won't help you find it because it doesn't understand minus signs" DeLaney -- \/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK> http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
In article <b4028f6e-eabe-48fd-a433-5d9381973...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
SALY <ssssssssss...@gmail.com> wrote: > The question that torn the theory of evolution > The question is pretty simple > But to answer it is scientifically impossible
> How did life start in the earth ?
We're beginning to sort out the details. In certain high-CO2 environments that would have occurred on the primitive Earth, the major metabolic pathways that now converge on the TCA cycle go into reverse. That produces an accumulation of complex organic compounds. Cell membranes spontaneously self-assemble from other compounds in the same environment. You also get spontaneous polymerisation of amines and sugars. So the answer seems to be that in some environments, life is a likely outcome of increasing chemical complexity. This is consistent with other evidence that life appeared on the Earth within about 100 million years of the surface becoming tolerable for it.
Life is a natural side-effect of the complexity created by gravitational hierarchies.
|
