On Oct 3, 6:58 pm, wdst
...@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote:
> In article <471da12b-26bc-43f5-b4d8-91aacf115
...@h60g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> trag <t
...@io.com> said:
> > On Oct 3, 4:21 pm, Quadibloc <jsav...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
> >> The point is that Turkey or no Turkey, Britain or no Britain, the
> >> Islamic world still conceives of itself as one - pan-Islamism and
> >> pan- Arabism have deep emotional roots out there.
> > <howling laughter> Except when they're breaking into family based
> > tribal groups and trying to slaughter one another. But you really
> > bought the Palestinian apologist bit hook line and sinker.
> I thought it was the War on (Islamic But We Don't Say That Out Loud)
> Terror bit.
Well, based on opinions stated here, I could make a case for either
one, but I'm not sure it would be a fair case. Which is why I would
never make a good^h^h^h^h successful lawyer despite being licensed and
degreed in Law.
