> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 03:49:25 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> > wrote:
>> Fact: There are no "prophets of atheism". Atheism isn't a religion. >> Atheism isn't a belief system. Atheism has no sacred books, no >> churches, no priesthood. Atheism is nothing but the lack of a belief >> in any gods.
> Wrong, you big dudass. Atheism is the rejection and denial of the existence of > God. If you simply don't find the evidence for God existence compelling, then > you are an agnostic.
Completely wrong. Agnosticism holds that some things are ultimately unknowable, not that you're sitting on a theological fence.
> But and atheist categorically rejects the existence of God.
Wrong again. No wonder your arguments around atheism sound stupid - you don't even know what you're arguing against.
> And I wonder what > evidence you have for that.
We've been wondering about your evidence showing that your god exists for quite some time and you keep refusing to produce any.
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:00:09 -0700, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 03:49:25 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 >> <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>> Fact: Every single prophet int he Bible was wrong, including their >>> most precious prophet, the fictional Jesus Christ, who predicted that >>> he would return in his glory whilst those around him still lived. >>> it's now 2,000 years later, everyone who was alive in the fictional >>> time of Jesus is dead, and Jesus hasn't been heard of since.
>>> This proves he was either complete fiction or a LIAR. Which is it >>> SoT? >> Lots of people believe things which aren't so, which doesn't make them >> liars. Lots of people have claims made about them which they did >> not say, which does not make them liars.
>> I don't have evidence that every prophecy of the Bible was wrong. I >> bet you could make predictions that are right.
>> You seem to be responding as irrationally as the theists.
> We Christians have all the evidence, and it definitely announces that "God is > real".
Does that mean you'll actually produce it this time?
Dan Listermann, ye bellyless monstrous malefactor, if thou dost marry, I'll give thee this plague for thy dowry, be thou as chaste as ice, as pure as snow, thou shall not escape calummy, ye imputed:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <a...@no.email> wrote in message > news:rxwze7$7kl$b@rec.newsadmin.depression.recovery.sanctuary.net.tanzania... >> William December Starr, ye dread-bolted piece of valiant dust, a >> whitely wanton with a velvet brow, with two pitch balls stuck in thy >> face for eyes art thou, ye prompted:
>>> In article >>> <bnzgm3$97...@alt.sex.small-fry-live-sausage.org.tunisia>, >>> Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> said: >>>> Budikka666 [said:]
>>>>> Fact: There are no "prophets of atheism".
>>>> Results 1 - 10 of about 415,000 for "prophets of atheism". (0.40 >>>> seconds)
>>>> *COUGH*
>>> Why have you said something irrelevant to the subject at hand, and >>> then coughed? Are you unwell?
>> Comprehension isn't your strong suit, hey.
> A mild insult, considering . . .
Considering I wasn't addressing you, I'll take the compliment and run.
They weren't wrong about "everything." They left being wrong about the end of the world to the Christians, who have been doing a bang-up job of getting that wrong for over 2,000 years.
>They weren't wrong about "everything." They left being wrong about the >end of the world to the Christians, who have been doing a bang-up job of >getting that wrong for over 2,000 years.
I had a colleague who played the gee-gees. Before a race he would tell you what horse would win and why. Afterwards he's tell you why it didn't.
>>>Fact: Every single prophet int he Bible was wrong, including their >>>most precious prophet, the fictional Jesus Christ, who predicted that >>>he would return in his glory whilst those around him still lived. >>>it's now 2,000 years later, everyone who was alive in the fictional >>>time of Jesus is dead, and Jesus hasn't been heard of since.
>>>This proves he was either complete fiction or a LIAR. Which is it >>>SoT?
>>Lots of people believe things which aren't so, which doesn't make them >>liars. Lots of people have claims made about them which they did >>not say, which does not make them liars.
>>I don't have evidence that every prophecy of the Bible was wrong. I >>bet you could make predictions that are right.
>>You seem to be responding as irrationally as the theists.
> We Christians have all the evidence, and it definitely announces that > "God is real".
> Dan Listermann, ye bellyless monstrous malefactor, if thou dost marry, > I'll give thee this plague for thy dowry, be thou as chaste as ice, as > pure as snow, thou shall not escape calummy, ye imputed:
> > "Kadaitcha Man" <a...@no.email> wrote in message > >news:rxwze7$7kl$b@rec.newsadmin.depression.recovery.sanctuary.net.tanzania... > >> William December Starr, ye dread-bolted piece of valiant dust, a > >> whitely wanton with a velvet brow, with two pitch balls stuck in thy > >> face for eyes art thou, ye prompted:
> >>> In article > >>> <bnzgm3$97...@alt.sex.small-fry-live-sausage.org.tunisia>, > >>> Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> said: > >>>> Budikka666 [said:]
> >>>>> Fact: There are no "prophets of atheism".
> >>>> Results 1 - 10 of about 415,000 for "prophets of atheism". (0.40 > >>>> seconds)
> >>>> *COUGH*
> >>> Why have you said something irrelevant to the subject at hand, and > >>> then coughed? Are you unwell?
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:34:38 -0600, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote: >Wrong, you big dudass. Atheism is the rejection and denial of the existence of >God. If you simply don't find the evidence for God existence compelling, then >you are an agnostic.
>But and atheist categorically rejects the existence of God. And I wonder what >evidence you have for that.
What do you call someone who doesn't believe in Santa Claus?
-- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
DouhetSukd wrote: > I propose we dig into our pockets and sign Strumpet up for a course to > improve conciseness and clarity in written communication.
It would be more productive to buy him a one-way ticket to some tiny village in the middle of the Canadian Northwest Territories that has no internet access.
> In article > <rxwze7$7k...@rec.newsadmin.depression.recovery.sanctuary.net.tanzania>, > Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> said:
>> William December Starr [said:] >>> Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> said:
>>>> Budikka666 [said:]
>>>>> Fact: There are no "prophets of atheism".
>>>> Results 1 - 10 of about 415,000 for "prophets of atheism". (0.40 >>>> seconds)
>>>> *COUGH*
>>> Why have you said something irrelevant to the subject at hand, and >>> then coughed? Are you unwell?
>> Comprehension isn't your strong suit, hey.
> Possibly expression isn't yours. You appear to believe that you > were making a point by citing those google numbers, but you have > neglected to say what you believe it is.
Hey, why blame someone else's powers of expression when even blind fucking Freddy could see the connection that you cannot?
On Nov 1, 9:34 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 03:49:25 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> > wrote:
> >Fact: There are no "prophets of atheism". Atheism isn't a religion. > >Atheism isn't a belief system. Atheism has no sacred books, no > >churches, no priesthood. Atheism is nothing but the lack of a belief > >in any gods.
> Wrong,
No, he is 100% correct. lying pedophile loving duke.
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:00:09 -0700, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote: > >On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 03:49:25 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 > ><budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
> >>Fact: Every single prophet int he Bible was wrong, including their > >>most precious prophet, the fictional Jesus Christ, who predicted that > >>he would return in his glory whilst those around him still lived. > >>it's now 2,000 years later, everyone who was alive in the fictional > >>time of Jesus is dead, and Jesus hasn't been heard of since.
> >>This proves he was either complete fiction or a LIAR. Which is it > >>SoT?
> >Lots of people believe things which aren't so, which doesn't make them > >liars. Lots of people have claims made about them which they did > >not say, which does not make them liars.
> >I don't have evidence that every prophecy of the Bible was wrong. I > >bet you could make predictions that are right.
> >You seem to be responding as irrationally as the theists.
> We Christians have all the evidence,
Imaginary sky pixies running around in your head does not constitutute proof in the real world, lying pedophile loving duke.
>>>>> Results 1 - 10 of about 415,000 for "prophets of atheism". (0.40 >>>>> seconds)
>>>>> *COUGH*
>>>> Why have you said something irrelevant to the subject at hand, and >>>> then coughed? Are you unwell?
>>> Comprehension isn't your strong suit, hey.
>> Possibly expression isn't yours. You appear to believe that you >> were making a point by citing those google numbers, but you have >> neglected to say what you believe it is.
> Hey, why blame someone else's powers of expression when even blind > fucking Freddy could see the connection that you cannot?
That would be the connection that you consistently refuse to disclose... You _do_ realize that you're acting exactly like someone who tried to pull a fast one and got called on it, right?
> In article > <0oq2mr$lx...@alt.comedy.amateur.female.schizophrenics.net.china>, > Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> said:
>> William December Starr [said:]
>>>>>>> Fact: There are no "prophets of atheism".
>>>>>> Results 1 - 10 of about 415,000 for "prophets of atheism". (0.40 >>>>>> seconds)
>>>>>> *COUGH*
>>>>> Why have you said something irrelevant to the subject at hand, and >>>>> then coughed? Are you unwell?
>>>> Comprehension isn't your strong suit, hey.
>>> Possibly expression isn't yours. You appear to believe that you >>> were making a point by citing those google numbers, but you have >>> neglected to say what you believe it is.
>> Hey, why blame someone else's powers of expression when even blind >> fucking Freddy could see the connection that you cannot?
> That would be the connection that you consistently refuse to > disclose... You _do_ realize that you're acting exactly like > someone who tried to pull a fast one and got called on it, right?
Call me when you think you have something that'll make the 6 o'clock news.
In article <nghls8$ih...@sci.med.contagious-dyke-snack.net.azerbaijan>, Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> said:
>>>>> Comprehension isn't your strong suit, hey.
>>>> Possibly expression isn't yours. You appear to believe that you >>>> were making a point by citing those google numbers, but you have >>>> neglected to say what you believe it is.
>>> Hey, why blame someone else's powers of expression when even blind >>> fucking Freddy could see the connection that you cannot?
>> That would be the connection that you consistently refuse to >> disclose... You _do_ realize that you're acting exactly like >> someone who tried to pull a fast one and got called on it, right?
> Call me when you think you have something that'll make the 6 > o'clock news.
Aaaaand you're still doing it. Apparently you're one of those "trolls" that we've been hearing so much about lately. Okay, bye.
> In article > <nghls8$ih...@sci.med.contagious-dyke-snack.net.azerbaijan>, > Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> said:
>>>>>> Comprehension isn't your strong suit, hey.
>>>>> Possibly expression isn't yours. You appear to believe that you >>>>> were making a point by citing those google numbers, but you have >>>>> neglected to say what you believe it is.
>>>> Hey, why blame someone else's powers of expression when even blind >>>> fucking Freddy could see the connection that you cannot?
>>> That would be the connection that you consistently refuse to >>> disclose... You _do_ realize that you're acting exactly like >>> someone who tried to pull a fast one and got called on it, right?
>> Call me when you think you have something that'll make the 6 >> o'clock news.
> Aaaaand you're still doing it. Apparently you're one of those > "trolls" that we've been hearing so much about lately. Okay, bye.
On 1 Nov 2009 09:45:00 -0500, William December Starr <wdst...@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <g47re518f8bflkvlblc8763ri3p49bm...@4ax.com>, > duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> said:
>> We Christians have all the evidence, and it definitely announces >> that "God is real".
> Are you lying, or merely demented?
Flip a coin, and either way it falls, he can honestly answer to either description, from what I've seen of his ravings over the last decade and change.
-- Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patr...@io.com) Houston, Texas www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273 LAST GAME: Texas 3, Houston 1 (October 30) NEXT GAME:Thursday, November 5 vs. Manitoba, 5:05
|
