MacNevology - Atheism vs Christianity

Message from discussion MacNevology
From:  Delusional? <dtatu...@gmail.com>
To:  Atheism vs Christianity <Atheism-vs-Christianity@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: MacNevology
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:49:22 -0000
Message-ID: <1188755362.497250.256630@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1188739871.441748.46700@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
References: <1188739871.441748.46700@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dev you have been on a classic rant the past few days and it is quite
enjoyable to watch :-)  Happy Labor Day weekend and have a drink or
six on me :-)

On Sep 2, 9:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides
> _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people
> think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I
> just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here
> is kind of fun.
>
> Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the
> regulars know these things about him.
>
> (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to
> heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God
> then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a
> waste of time."
>
> (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns
> around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about
> the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has
> been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to
> make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of
> Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
>
> (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was
> voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that
> it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no
> way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of
> a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a
> lie.
>
> I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died.
> If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good
> things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't
> think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better
> place if something were to "happen" though.
>
> And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough
> to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and
> cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just
> jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he
> makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
>
> Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.