MacNevology - Atheism vs Christianity

Message from discussion MacNevology
From:  OldMan <edjarr...@msn.com>
To:  Atheism vs Christianity <Atheism-vs-Christianity@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: MacNevology
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 06:36:46 -0700
Message-ID: <1188826606.303834.321600@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1188791781.480150.179020@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
References: <1188739871.441748.46700@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
   <1188766514.821232.68520@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1188791781.480150.179020@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

On Sep 2, 8:56 pm, rappoccio <rappoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 2, 4:55 pm, OldMan <edjarr...@msn.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
> > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides
> > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people
> > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I
> > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here
> > > is kind of fun.
>
> > > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the
> > > regulars know these things about him.
>
> > > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to
> > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God
> > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a
> > > waste of time."
>
> > > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns
> > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about
> > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has
> > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to
> > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of
> > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
>
> > > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was
> > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that
> > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no
> > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of
> > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a
> > > lie.
>
> > > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died.
> > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good
> > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't
> > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better
> > > place if something were to "happen" though.
>
> > > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough
> > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and
> > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just
> > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he
> > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
>
> > > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
>
> > He has admitted more than once that he is just trying to stir things
> > up.  I think every time you go after him you are just feeding his
> > ego.
>
> That may be true, but Keith's crap does absolutely nothing to further
> the cause of Christians.

I totally agree.  Although I suspect he doesn't care.

> You and Del do a much better job, you know,
> posting actual content and what-not.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -