Message from discussion
MacNevology
Received: by 10.35.58.8 with SMTP id l8mr17467613pyk.1188880959031;
Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <kmacnev...@gmail.com>
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.185])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v63si1193658pyh.2007.09.03.21.42.38;
Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kmacnev...@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.185 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.128.185;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kmacnev...@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.185 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kmacnev...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so2486175fkr
for <Atheism-vs-Christianity@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=HxFRBqfqVWlaIfDOITAg1EOdOhADac/kdE2IqDOFSk5tQLzhipmzDyFX44Y0JKZPfBKONrXw00HOjUhRd8dus66M5eP/8LLINtHep6nQ6PIfn+Hn3yb4kseZdh7QP/Ahi0p6z1vbTKeB81OMu1NZl4oZT+EIkcbdMzkY551W7P8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=AvXWE+/01NHTfEM4sTrUSDe7duFkMMDprUnX0e27kr+KEqVadOy4P2eAWmEOzMbLH08DlViV1+1qJwNJhbSNPkl/JA047QIWA+jcGgQX/yy0uR5gZKKEws79WBqkWGbPZJVtkv1Y4QTwgcsQcyF3b5qHDmRkBhb8kHWsDmZMazg=
Received: by 10.82.165.13 with SMTP id n13mr849137bue.1188880958011;
Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.82.168.9 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 21:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49a6a6240709032142t19df810r9f7d1a9374a51eea@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 23:42:37 -0500
From: "Keith MacNevins" <kmacnev...@gmail.com>
To: Atheism-vs-Christianity@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: MacNevology
In-Reply-To: <1188776446.553258.127990@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_15695_32957928.1188880957754"
References: <1188739871.441748.46...@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
<1188776446.553258.127...@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
------=_Part_15695_32957928.1188880957754
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
You more than make up for that.
On 9/2/07, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides
> > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people
> > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I
> > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here
> > is kind of fun.
> >
> > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the
> > regulars know these things about him.
> >
> > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to
> > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God
> > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a
> > waste of time."
> >
> > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns
> > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about
> > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has
> > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to
> > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of
> > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> >
> > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was
> > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that
> > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no
> > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of
> > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a
> > lie.
> >
> > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died.
> > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good
> > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't
> > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better
> > place if something were to "happen" though.
> >
> > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough
> > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and
> > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just
> > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he
> > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> >
> > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
>
> Observer
>
> Keith is so inept that, his posts seldom even rise to the level of
> *disgusting *.
>
> Regards
>
> Psychonomist
>
>
>
>
> >
>
--
copyright
Ambassador From Hell
Keith A. MacNevins
Elk Grove Village, IL
USA
------=_Part_15695_32957928.1188880957754
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
You more than make up for that.<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/2/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Observer</b> <<a href="mailto:mayors...@gmail.com">mayors...@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br><br><br>On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <<a href="mailto:thedevil...@fastmail.fm">thedevil...@fastmail.fm</a>
> wrote:<br>> SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides<br>> _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people<br>> think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I
<br>> just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here<br>> is kind of fun.<br>><br>> Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the<br>> regulars know these things about him.
<br>><br>> (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to<br>> heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God<br>> then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a
<br>> waste of time."<br>><br>> (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns<br>> around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about<br>> the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has
<br>> been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to<br>> make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of<br>> Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
<br>><br>> (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was<br>> voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that<br>> it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no
<br>> way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of<br>> a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a<br>> lie.<br>><br>> I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died.
<br>> If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good<br>> things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't<br>> think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better
<br>> place if something were to "happen" though.<br>><br>> And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough<br>> to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and
<br>> cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just<br>> jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he<br>> makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
<br>><br>> Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.<br><br>Observer<br><br>Keith is so inept that, his posts seldom even rise to the level of<br>*disgusting *.<br><br>Regards<br><br>Psychonomist
<br><br><br><br><br>
------=_Part_15695_32957928.1188880957754--
|
