> On Oct 25, 2:23 am, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 24, 5:47 am, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > i know that its a weighty issue times 186,000 mps times a bunch
> > > more....other than that, not much. and you?
> > > On Oct 24, 1:07 am, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Oct 23, 6:35 pm, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > since you have finally made a comment that isnt full of vile, i will
> > > > > respond, but first of all, do you believe that energy cannot be
> > > > > created nor destroyed?
> > > > Observer
> > > > Do you understand E=MC^2 ?
> > Once again your lack of education has disrupted the conversation .
> > In the formula, c2 is the conversion factor required to convert from
> > units of mass to units of energy.
> > Do you remember your question or has that too just vanished into the
> > nonsense you make of everything .
> > Psychonomist
> > > > Psychonomist
> > > > > On Oct 23, 9:31 pm, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Oct 22, 7:46 pm, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > spiritually observant. in the post i was responding to, he states that
> > > > > > > spritual, metaphysical, paranormal, ghosts, etc are all bunk simply
> > > > > > > because he has had no experience with any of it. i think anybody who
> > > > > > > catagorically states in a factual manner, that something does not
> > > > > > > exist because they havent experienced it personally, is shallow. what
> > > > > > > do you think? do you think it is wise to say 'that does not exist,
> > > > > > > because i have not experienced it...period'?
> > > > > > Observer
> > > > > > It is commonly understood that such experiences as are the product of
> > > > > > psychological anomaly are not confirm able by other that the
> > > > > > individual in who's mind such occurs. The experiences are of course
> > > > > > real in that there are physiological , that is, electrochemical
> > > > > > events to which the individual is reacting.
> > > > > > Quote
> > > > > > Endorphins are endogenous opioid polypeptide compounds. They are
> > > > > > produced by the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus in vertebrates
> > > > > > during strenuous exercise,[1] excitement, pain and orgasm,[2][3] and
> > > > > > they resemble the opiates in their abilities to produce analgesia and
> > > > > > a feeling of well-being. Endorphins have also been shown to be
> > > > > > released in profound relaxation in a float tank.[4] Endorphins work as
> > > > > > "natural pain relievers."
> > > > > > The term "endorphin" implies a pharmacological activity (analogous to
> > > > > > the activity of the corticosteroid category of biochemicals) as
> > > > > > opposed to a specific chemical formulation. It consists of two parts:
> > > > > > endo- and -orphin; these are short forms of the words endogenous and
> > > > > > morphine, intended to mean "a morphine-like substance originating from
> > > > > > within the body."[5]
> > > > > > End quote.
> > > > > > If you took the time to analyze the particulars of your personal
> > > > > > experiences and properly educate yourself in human neurology
> > > > > > thereof such would be much clearer to you ,and infinitely more
> > > > > > useful.
> > > > > > There is sound scientific data upon which to base your heretofore
> > > > > > misinterpreted experiences and to allow for more accurate
> > > > > > understanding thereof.
> > > > > > The fictions which you have created in your attempt to deal with
> > > > > > these events, and where in you label mislabel cognitive processes
> > > > > > as entities e.g.s.( thought, improperly labeled as a spiritual
> > > > > > entity )will necessarily vanish and leave you with usable data upon
> > > > > > which to build a life better guided by enhanced accuracy relating
> > > > > > thereto, Allowing you the luxury of usable and accurate data by
> > > > > > which to represent what you really experienced, and by which to deal
> > > > > > with it more accurately.
> > > > > > As always the advantage of scientific data properly analyzed is
> > > > > > incomparable to the superstitious concepts acquired by juxtaposition
> > > > > > of misinterpreted experience to the nonsense of metaphysical
> > > > > > nonsense , and by the foolish fetishism's of magic and voodoo hoodoo.
> > > > > > A little education if you please !
> > > > > > The Ignorant have neither read nor understood science the brutes and
> > > > > > the criminally stupid refuse to do so.
> > > > > > Psychonomist
> > > > > > \
> > > > > > > On Oct 22, 12:09 pm, Answer_42 <ipu.belie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Oct 21, 3:52 pm, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > your disbelief in the spiritual does nothing to deny its existance. in
> > > > > > > > > fact, from my point of view, it just confirms your shallow nature.
> > > > > > > > So, is e_space arrogantly spiritual, or spiritually arrogant?
> > > > > > > > _____________________________________________
> > > > > > > > There is an important and correct way in which understanding religion
> > > > > > > > is incompatible with believing in it.
> > > > > > > > -- Kai Nielsen- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Those who are religious and think they are having a religious experience as
just as stoned and high as some drug addict....and they are just as
addicted, which means like a drug addict the religious cannot take reason
and facts seriously. (Research using MRIs and PET scans...showing blood flow
in the brain of both xians and drug addicts....indicate they are both stoned
out of their minds....See Rice University studies).
The religious get a hard one when they think about jesus hanging on the
cross, almost naked, strapped up in a bondage outfit...and all bloody and
beaten.....Xianity is about sexual sado masochism...and death...
Now can any "normal" person with an education, who has some decency about
them...then worship some half dead, bloody beaten up guy in a diaper hanging
on a stick?
Hell, Mighty Mouse has more power than jesus....he just socks the bad guys
on the chin...but jesus wants you to forgive them, hahahahahah
Everyday, this forum gives me so many opportunities to laugh my ass off at
the unremarkable silliness of xians. Thank you....
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 26, 7:42 am, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > did you forget my original question? how about answering that?
> Observer
> That is the answer you un-educated oaf. Are you so fucking stupid that
> you can not understand?
> Psychonomist
> > On Oct 25, 2:23 am, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Oct 24, 5:47 am, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > i know that its a weighty issue times 186,000 mps times a bunch
> > > > more....other than that, not much. and you?
> > > > On Oct 24, 1:07 am, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Oct 23, 6:35 pm, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > since you have finally made a comment that isnt full of vile, i
> will
> > > > > > respond, but first of all, do you believe that energy cannot be
> > > > > > created nor destroyed?
> > > > > Observer
> > > > > Do you understand E=MC^2 ?
> > > Once again your lack of education has disrupted the conversation .
> > > In the formula, c2 is the conversion factor required to convert from
> > > units of mass to units of energy.
> > > Do you remember your question or has that too just vanished into the
> > > nonsense you make of everything .
> > > Psychonomist
> > > > > Psychonomist
> > > > > > On Oct 23, 9:31 pm, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Oct 22, 7:46 pm, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > spiritually observant. in the post i was responding to, he
> states that
> > > > > > > > spritual, metaphysical, paranormal, ghosts, etc are all bunk
> simply
> > > > > > > > because he has had no experience with any of it. i think
> anybody who
> > > > > > > > catagorically states in a factual manner, that something does
> not
> > > > > > > > exist because they havent experienced it personally, is
> shallow. what
> > > > > > > > do you think? do you think it is wise to say 'that does not
> exist,
> > > > > > > > because i have not experienced it...period'?
> > > > > > > Observer
> > > > > > > It is commonly understood that such experiences as are the
> product of
> > > > > > > psychological anomaly are not confirm able by other that the
> > > > > > > individual in who's mind such occurs. The experiences are of
> course
> > > > > > > real in that there are physiological , that is,
> electrochemical
> > > > > > > events to which the individual is reacting.
> > > > > > > Quote
> > > > > > > Endorphins are endogenous opioid polypeptide compounds. They
> are
> > > > > > > produced by the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus in
> vertebrates
> > > > > > > during strenuous exercise,[1] excitement, pain and
> orgasm,[2][3] and
> > > > > > > they resemble the opiates in their abilities to produce
> analgesia and
> > > > > > > a feeling of well-being. Endorphins have also been shown to be
> > > > > > > released in profound relaxation in a float tank.[4] Endorphins
> work as
> > > > > > > "natural pain relievers."
> > > > > > > The term "endorphin" implies a pharmacological activity
> (analogous to
> > > > > > > the activity of the corticosteroid category of biochemicals) as
> > > > > > > opposed to a specific chemical formulation. It consists of two
> parts:
> > > > > > > endo- and -orphin; these are short forms of the words
> endogenous and
> > > > > > > morphine, intended to mean "a morphine-like substance
> originating from
> > > > > > > within the body."[5]
> > > > > > > End quote.
> > > > > > > If you took the time to analyze the particulars of your
> personal
> > > > > > > experiences and properly educate yourself in human neurology
> > > > > > > thereof such would be much clearer to you ,and infinitely more
> > > > > > > useful.
> > > > > > > There is sound scientific data upon which to base your
> heretofore
> > > > > > > misinterpreted experiences and to allow for more accurate
> > > > > > > understanding thereof.
> > > > > > > The fictions which you have created in your attempt to deal
> with
> > > > > > > these events, and where in you label mislabel cognitive
> processes
> > > > > > > as entities e.g.s.( thought, improperly labeled as a
> spiritual
> > > > > > > entity )will necessarily vanish and leave you with usable data
> upon
> > > > > > > which to build a life better guided by enhanced accuracy
> relating
> > > > > > > thereto, Allowing you the luxury of usable and accurate data
> by
> > > > > > > which to represent what you really experienced, and by which
> to deal
> > > > > > > with it more accurately.
> > > > > > > As always the advantage of scientific data properly analyzed is
> > > > > > > incomparable to the superstitious concepts acquired by
> juxtaposition
> > > > > > > of misinterpreted experience to the nonsense of metaphysical
> > > > > > > nonsense , and by the foolish fetishism's of magic and voodoo
> hoodoo.
> > > > > > > A little education if you please !
> > > > > > > The Ignorant have neither read nor understood science the
> brutes and
> > > > > > > the criminally stupid refuse to do so.
> > > > > > > Psychonomist
> > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 12:09 pm, Answer_42 <ipu.belie...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Oct 21, 3:52 pm, showmethehoney <
> alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > your disbelief in the spiritual does nothing to deny its
> existance. in
> > > > > > > > > > fact, from my point of view, it just confirms your
> shallow nature.
> > > > > > > > > So, is e_space arrogantly spiritual, or spiritually
> arrogant?
> > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > There is an important and correct way in which
> understanding religion
> > > > > > > > > is incompatible with believing in it.
> > > > > > > > > -- Kai Nielsen- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > > - Show quoted text -
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Atheism vs Christianity" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> atheism-vs-christianity@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> atheism-vs-christianity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<atheism-vs-christianit y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/atheism-vs-christianity?hl=en.
> Those who are religious and think they are having a religious experience as
> just as stoned and high as some drug addict....and they are just as
> addicted, which means like a drug addict the religious cannot take reason
> and facts seriously. (Research using MRIs and PET scans...showing blood flow
> in the brain of both xians and drug addicts....indicate they are both stoned
> out of their minds....See Rice University studies).
> The religious get a hard one when they think about jesus hanging on the
> cross, almost naked, strapped up in a bondage outfit...and all bloody and
> beaten.....Xianity is about sexual sado masochism...and death...
> Now can any "normal" person with an education, who has some decency about
> them...then worship some half dead, bloody beaten up guy in a diaper hanging
> on a stick?
> Hell, Mighty Mouse has more power than jesus....he just socks the bad guys
> on the chin...but jesus wants you to forgive them, hahahahahah
> Everyday, this forum gives me so many opportunities to laugh my ass off at
> the unremarkable silliness of xians. Thank you....
Observer
Thanks for your contribution to reason !
It is important that there are people such as you who can and will
spell out the obvious to an unthinking world .
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 26, 7:42 am, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > did you forget my original question? how about answering that?
> > Observer
> > That is the answer you un-educated oaf. Are you so fucking stupid that
> > you can not understand?
> > Psychonomist
> > > On Oct 25, 2:23 am, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Oct 24, 5:47 am, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > i know that its a weighty issue times 186,000 mps times a bunch
> > > > > more....other than that, not much. and you?
> > > > > On Oct 24, 1:07 am, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Oct 23, 6:35 pm, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > since you have finally made a comment that isnt full of vile, i
> > will
> > > > > > > respond, but first of all, do you believe that energy cannot be
> > > > > > > created nor destroyed?
> > > > > > Observer
> > > > > > Do you understand E=MC^2 ?
> > > > Once again your lack of education has disrupted the conversation .
> > > > In the formula, c2 is the conversion factor required to convert from
> > > > units of mass to units of energy.
> > > > Do you remember your question or has that too just vanished into the
> > > > nonsense you make of everything .
> > > > Psychonomist
> > > > > > Psychonomist
> > > > > > > On Oct 23, 9:31 pm, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 7:46 pm, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > spiritually observant. in the post i was responding to, he
> > states that
> > > > > > > > > spritual, metaphysical, paranormal, ghosts, etc are all bunk
> > simply
> > > > > > > > > because he has had no experience with any of it. i think
> > anybody who
> > > > > > > > > catagorically states in a factual manner, that something does
> > not
> > > > > > > > > exist because they havent experienced it personally, is
> > shallow. what
> > > > > > > > > do you think? do you think it is wise to say 'that does not
> > exist,
> > > > > > > > > because i have not experienced it...period'?
> > > > > > > > Observer
> > > > > > > > It is commonly understood that such experiences as are the
> > product of
> > > > > > > > psychological anomaly are not confirm able by other that the
> > > > > > > > individual in who's mind such occurs. The experiences are of
> > course
> > > > > > > > real in that there are physiological , that is,
> > electrochemical
> > > > > > > > events to which the individual is reacting.
> > > > > > > > Quote
> > > > > > > > Endorphins are endogenous opioid polypeptide compounds. They
> > are
> > > > > > > > produced by the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus in
> > vertebrates
> > > > > > > > during strenuous exercise,[1] excitement, pain and
> > orgasm,[2][3] and
> > > > > > > > they resemble the opiates in their abilities to produce
> > analgesia and
> > > > > > > > a feeling of well-being. Endorphins have also been shown to be
> > > > > > > > released in profound relaxation in a float tank.[4] Endorphins
> > work as
> > > > > > > > "natural pain relievers."
> > > > > > > > The term "endorphin" implies a pharmacological activity
> > (analogous to
> > > > > > > > the activity of the corticosteroid category of biochemicals) as
> > > > > > > > opposed to a specific chemical formulation. It consists of two
> > parts:
> > > > > > > > endo- and -orphin; these are short forms of the words
> > endogenous and
> > > > > > > > morphine, intended to mean "a morphine-like substance
> > originating from
> > > > > > > > within the body."[5]
> > > > > > > > End quote.
> > > > > > > > If you took the time to analyze the particulars of your
> > personal
> > > > > > > > experiences and properly educate yourself in human neurology
> > > > > > > > thereof such would be much clearer to you ,and infinitely more
> > > > > > > > useful.
> > > > > > > > There is sound scientific data upon which to base your
> > heretofore
> > > > > > > > misinterpreted experiences and to allow for more accurate
> > > > > > > > understanding thereof.
> > > > > > > > The fictions which you have created in your attempt to deal
> > with
> > > > > > > > these events, and where in you label mislabel cognitive
> > processes
> > > > > > > > as entities e.g.s.( thought, improperly labeled as a
> > spiritual
> > > > > > > > entity )will necessarily vanish and leave you with usable data
> > upon
> > > > > > > > which to build a life better guided by enhanced accuracy
> > relating
> > > > > > > > thereto, Allowing you the luxury of usable and accurate data
> > by
> > > > > > > > which to represent what you really experienced, and by which
> > to deal
> > > > > > > > with it more accurately.
> > > > > > > > As always the advantage of scientific data properly analyzed is
> > > > > > > > incomparable to the superstitious concepts acquired by
> > juxtaposition
> > > > > > > > of misinterpreted experience to the nonsense of metaphysical
> > > > > > > > nonsense , and by the foolish fetishism's of magic and voodoo
> > hoodoo.
> > > > > > > > A little education if you please !
> > > > > > > > The Ignorant have neither read nor understood science the
> > brutes and
> > > > > > > > the criminally stupid refuse to do so.
> > > > > > > > Psychonomist
> > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 12:09 pm, Answer_42 <ipu.belie...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > your disbelief in the spiritual does nothing to deny its
> > existance. in
> > > > > > > > > > > fact, from my point of view, it just confirms your
> > shallow nature.
> > > > > > > > > > So, is e_space arrogantly spiritual, or spiritually
> > arrogant?
> > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > There is an important and correct way in which
> > understanding religion
> > > > > > > > > > is incompatible with believing in it.
> > > > > > > > > > -- Kai Nielsen- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Atheism vs Christianity" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > atheism-vs-christianity@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > atheism-vs-christianity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<atheism-vs-christianit y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/atheism-vs-christianity?hl=en.
On Oct 26, 7:46 am, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> religion is man made and therefore not directly associated with 'god',
Observer
Unless you are prepared to provide scientifically verifiable
substantiating data for proving the existence of or any act of any
god , I suggest that you refrain from proffering such nonsense as a
god thing. Doing so, really, makes you look stupid.
> despite their claims of such. if you can manage to get past the
> written word of man, you might be able to drop your overbite against
> religion and start looking at the possibility of 'god' in another
> light. then again, i rather doubt it.
What god? You oaf , what god ? and where is the proof thereof back in
the multitude of the hallucinations produced to ease the pain of your
early abuse?
Get an education , please! learning is the second greatest joy, but
unlike the first greatest, it last for a life time.
> On Oct 26, 2:13 am, Observer <mayors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 6:28 am, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > you seem to equate religion to god,
> > Quote
> > A religion is a system of human thought which usually includes a set
> > of narratives, symbols, beliefs and practices that give meaning to the
> > practitioner's experiences of life through reference to a higher
> > power, deity or deities, or ultimate truth.[1]
> > Religion is commonly identified by the practitioner's prayer, ritual,
> > meditation, music and art, among other things, but more generally is
> > interwoven with society and politics. It may focus on specific
> > supernatural, metaphysical, and moral claims about reality (the cosmos
> > and human nature) which may yield a set of religious laws, ethics, and
> > a particular lifestyle. Religion also encompasses ancestral or
> > cultural traditions, writings, history, and mythology, as well as
> > personal faith and religious experience.
> > i dont.
> > Observer
> > Reflecting upon the idea that you do not equate god with religion I am
> > primped by curiosity to ask just what for you constitutes religion
> > and just where has the comprehensive definition herewith listed gone
> > amiss?
> > there are many inspired
> > > books out there,
> > Observer
> > A platitude if nonsensical proportions , Inspired books require the
> > fulfillment of the following .
> > in⋅spire [in-spahyuhr] Show IPA verb, -spired, -spir⋅ing.
> > –verb (used with object)
> > 1. to fill with an animating, quickening, or exalting influence: His
> > courage inspired his followers.
> > 2. to produce or arouse (a feeling, thought, etc.): to inspire
> > confidence in others.
> > 3. to fill or affect with a specified feeling, thought, etc.: to
> > inspire a person with distrust.
> > 4. to influence or impel: Competition inspired her to greater efforts.
> > 5. to animate, as an influence, feeling, thought, or the like, does:
> > They were inspired by a belief in a better future.
> > 6. to communicate or suggest by a divine or supernatural influence:
> > writings inspired by God.
> > 7. to guide or control by divine influence.
> > 8. to prompt or instigate (utterances, acts, etc.) by influence,
> > without avowal of responsibility.
> > 9.to give rise to, bring about, cause, etc.: a philosophy that
> > inspired a revolution.
> > 10.
> > I once again beg you to attempt the act of education necessary for
> > any modicum so genuinely human experience.
> > What are the truly profound works of the world , those books wherein
> > inspirations are truly evidenced for all of the good or evil there
> > of and have have arisen to influence the actions of men for or
> > against the well being of our specie?
> > Inspirations are not all productive of what is best for us but only
> > what propels us into action for for what ever good or evil the
> > subject may per-mote.
> > Quote
> > Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong (simplified Chinese: 毛主席语录;
> > pinyin: Máo zhǔxí yǔlù), better known in the West as The Little Red
> > Book, was published by the Government of the People's Republic of
> > China from April 1964 until approximately 1976. As its title implies,
> > it is a collection of quotations excerpted from Mao Zedong's past
> > speeches and publications. The book's alternative title The Little Red
> > Book was coined by the West for its pocket-sized edition, which was
> > specifically printed and sold to facilitate easy carrying. The closest
> > equivalent in Chinese is 红宝书 (hóng bǎoshū), literally "The Red
> > Treasured Book", which was a term popular during the Cultural
> > Revolution.
> > The most printed book in the twentieth century, Quotations had an
> > estimated 5 to 6.5 billion copies printed during Mao's attempt to
> > transform Chinese society. The book's phenomenal popularity may be due
> > to the fact that it was essentially an unofficial requirement for
> > every Chinese citizen to own, to read, and to carry it at all times
> > during the later half of Mao's rule, especially during the Cultural
> > Revolution.
> > Is such a collection of writings demonstrative of the type of
> > inspiration to which a people should aspire?
> > Until you have filtered them through your self you will never know.
> > What of Adolf Hitler's
> > Mein Kampf
> > Main article: Mein Kampf
> > Mein Kampf
> > While at Landsberg he dictated most of the first volume of Mein Kampf
> > (My Struggle, originally entitled Four and a Half Years of Struggle
> > against Lies, Stupidity, and Cowardice) to his deputy Rudolf Hess.[47]
> > The book, dedicated to Thule Society member Dietrich Eckart, was an
> > autobiography and an exposition of his ideology. It was published in
> > two volumes in 1925 and 1926, selling about 240,000 copies between
> > 1925 and 1934. By the end of the war, about 10 million copies had been
> > sold or distributed.
> > We are aware that this great work if inspiration was influential in
> > the torture murders of six million Jews along with the hideous work
> > done by martin Luther in his His statements that the Jews' homes
> > should be destroyed, their synagogues burned, money confiscated, and
> > liberty curtailed were revived and used in propaganda by the Nazis
> > from 1933 to 1945.[8] As a result of this and his revolutionary
> > theological views, his legacy remains controversial.[9]
> > I point out to you the dire need for education that you ignore .
> > How do the great text books of modern science figure into what is
> > necessary to the well being of humankind? Once again there is little
> > likelihood that you will ever understand what is necessary to be a
> > responsible member of society in that you refuse the obligations
> > thereby placed upon those who can and will carry the mantel as others
> > tag along as parasites unwilling and unable due to their lack of
> > education , to share the load .
> > but since the bible has squatters rights, they are
> > > free to make the claim as THE inspired word of god. of course, i 100%
> > > disagree. inspiration isnt the sole property of the church, despite
> > > what they teach...you know, dont think, just believe what i tell you!
> > > people are free to think what they want about this of course, but that
> > > doesnt make them right unfortunately.
> > Observer
> > Ugh !
> > If your intent is to extract pity you are doing well .
> > The above paragraph is reflective of the fragmented base of operations
> > from which your life decisions are made . Please educate your self.
> > > if i wanted to get close to "god", the last thing i would do is read a
> > > book written by a bunch of men thousands of years ago, translated a
> > > bunch of times and extolled by an unrighteous person hiding behind the
> > > cloak of religion. i would look inside myself, dust off the spirit
> > > hiding deep within and try to figure it out all by myself, which is
> > > exactly what i have done. i dont put down the path that others have
> > > chosen, i just dont understand the naivette of such.
> > Observer
> > The search for useful data is paramount and you haven't the first clue
> > as to how such can be acquired .
> > Why not risk it all by testing the process of scientific method . The
> > ignorant have not read nor understood science the criminally and
> > terminally stupid will not.
> > Psychonomist
> > PS I responded to your question as to the destruction of matter /
> > energy and heard no further from you on the subject. Did you forget
> > where you were going again?
> > > On Oct 20, 8:40 am, Kippers <ro...@croft6942.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > i agree, but what does the bible have to do with god? its a book
> > > > > written by men with an underlying and devious agenda. this is what i
> > > > > find amusing about atheism. the stance is against a book that has no
> > > > > real ties to god, other than self promoted ones. those unfortunate
> > > > > enough to take the book literally probably deserve your ridicule, that
> > > > > is, in the lack of compassion for someone who is obviously less
> > > > > intelligent, or just lost, stressed out or needy. easy to pick on the
> > > > > unfortunate i guess...
> > > > > On Oct 20, 8:02 am, Simon Ewins <sjew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Every Christian on the planet (other than atheistic cultural
> > > > Christians as some may call themselves) either thinks the bible is the
> > > > word of god or that it is inspired by god.
|
