I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
comment on it here.
A Reminder.
All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
Coordinator Trance will be removed.
This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
Saint Onan.
OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
genocide charges.
The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
heavens above, on the following charges.
All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact numbers
unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
cleansing.
16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
- Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
- Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
made false representation to at least one party.
Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
all eternity from any academy of science.
CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
- make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper. The
Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
CHARGE: Indecent Exposure
-Exodus 33:17-23
In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
"shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as trifling
in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can be
exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
Civil Actions
---------------
Balaam vs. God
The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually the
plaintiff's life.
This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant and
his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
power of speech prior to delivery.
Onan vs. God
The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
interest at this point.
(Genesis 38:7-10)
Lucifer vs. God
Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
- Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
Esau vs. God
Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
fraudulent disinheritance
(Genesis 25:29-34)
- END OF CHARGES -
At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
have to provide grounds.
===== WIKIPEDIA =====
In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
(2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
admissions; and (4) depositions.
On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Before we dare to refute or sustain the claims made by the
prosecution, the jury would like to see a signed document by God, aka
Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im
Upstairs" verifying that the statements attributed to he/she/it by the
plainif are accurate, and indeed were spoken, written, inspired or
carved in stone by such. If no such document can be produced, we feel
it would be safe to assume that such statements were written by others
than those they are attributed to. Since the whole premiss of the
indictment is to find "god" guilty of genocide based on the written
word, finding the source of the words is vital to a beyond-reasonable-
doubt conviction of the defendant.
A survey of the jury has produced no evidence that any such member has
ever heard the voice of "god", so we must presume that the prosecution
has, in order for them to boldly claim the statements attributed to
"god" came from such. If no evidence of the origin of these words can
be substantiated, we would ask for a mistrial on the grounds of lack
of DNA evidence. In addition to this, we would ask that the
prosecution be sanctioned from any such case until such authentication
can be attained.
Your Over-Worked Under-Paid Jury
On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> comment on it here.
> A Reminder.
> All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> Saint Onan.
> OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> genocide charges.
> The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> heavens above, on the following charges.
> All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact numbers
> unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> cleansing.
> 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
> thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
> 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
> - Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
> God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> made false representation to at least one party.
> Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> all eternity from any academy of science.
> CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper. The
> Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> CHARGE: Indecent Exposure
> -Exodus 33:17-23
> In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as trifling
> in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can be
> exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> Civil Actions
> ---------------
> Balaam vs. God
> The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually the
> plaintiff's life.
> This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant and
> his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> power of speech prior to delivery.
> Onan vs. God
> The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> interest at this point.
> (Genesis 38:7-10)
> Lucifer vs. God
> Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> Esau vs. God
> Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> fraudulent disinheritance
> (Genesis 25:29-34)
> - END OF CHARGES -
> At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> have to provide grounds.
> ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> admissions; and (4) depositions.
> On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Before we dare to refute or sustain the claims made by the
> prosecution, the jury would like to see a signed document by God, aka
> Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im
> Upstairs" verifying that the statements attributed to he/she/it by the
> plainif are accurate, and indeed were spoken, written, inspired or
> carved in stone by such. If no such document can be produced, we feel
> it would be safe to assume that such statements were written by others
> than those they are attributed to. Since the whole premiss of the
> indictment is to find "god" guilty of genocide based on the written
> word, finding the source of the words is vital to a beyond-reasonable-
> doubt conviction of the defendant.
> A survey of the jury has produced no evidence that any such member has
> ever heard the voice of "god", so we must presume that the prosecution
> has, in order for them to boldly claim the statements attributed to
> "god" came from such. If no evidence of the origin of these words can
> be substantiated, we would ask for a mistrial on the grounds of lack
> of DNA evidence. In addition to this, we would ask that the
> prosecution be sanctioned from any such case until such authentication
> can be attained.
> Your Over-Worked Under-Paid Jury
> On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> > comment on it here.
> > A Reminder.
> > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > Saint Onan.
> > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> > genocide charges.
> > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact numbers
> > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> > cleansing.
> > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
> > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
> > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> > CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
> > - Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
> > God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> > made false representation to at least one party.
> > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper. The
> > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> > In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as trifling
> > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can be
> > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > Civil Actions
> > ---------------
> > Balaam vs. God
> > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually the
> > plaintiff's life.
> > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant and
> > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > Onan vs. God
> > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> > interest at this point.
> > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > Lucifer vs. God
> > Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> > - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> > Esau vs. God
> > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> > fraudulent disinheritance
> > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > - END OF CHARGES -
> > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> > have to provide grounds.
> > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> > which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> > documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > --
> > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide quoted
> text -
You are 100% correct your High Priestess Court Coordinator ma'am.
Please accept my sincere appologies. My enthusiastic duty to man,
beast, and 'god' got the better of me. :-(
On Oct 20, 11:46 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please note that you have no authority to speak on behalf of the entire
> Jury.
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:31 AM, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com
> > wrote:
> > Your Honor
> > Before we dare to refute or sustain the claims made by the
> > prosecution, the jury would like to see a signed document by God, aka
> > Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im
> > Upstairs" verifying that the statements attributed to he/she/it by the
> > plainif are accurate, and indeed were spoken, written, inspired or
> > carved in stone by such. If no such document can be produced, we feel
> > it would be safe to assume that such statements were written by others
> > than those they are attributed to. Since the whole premiss of the
> > indictment is to find "god" guilty of genocide based on the written
> > word, finding the source of the words is vital to a beyond-reasonable-
> > doubt conviction of the defendant.
> > A survey of the jury has produced no evidence that any such member has
> > ever heard the voice of "god", so we must presume that the prosecution
> > has, in order for them to boldly claim the statements attributed to
> > "god" came from such. If no evidence of the origin of these words can
> > be substantiated, we would ask for a mistrial on the grounds of lack
> > of DNA evidence. In addition to this, we would ask that the
> > prosecution be sanctioned from any such case until such authentication
> > can be attained.
> > Your Over-Worked Under-Paid Jury
> > On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> > > comment on it here.
> > > A Reminder.
> > > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> > > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> > > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > > Saint Onan.
> > > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> > > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> > > genocide charges.
> > > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> > > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact numbers
> > > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> > > cleansing.
> > > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
> > > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
> > > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> > > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> > > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> > > CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
> > > - Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
> > > God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> > > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> > > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> > > made false representation to at least one party.
> > > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> > > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper. The
> > > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> > > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> > > In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> > > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> > > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> > > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as trifling
> > > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> > > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can be
> > > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > > Civil Actions
> > > ---------------
> > > Balaam vs. God
> > > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> > > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually the
> > > plaintiff's life.
> > > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> > > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant and
> > > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> > > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > > Onan vs. God
> > > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> > > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> > > interest at this point.
> > > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > > Lucifer vs. God
> > > Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> > > - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> > > Esau vs. God
> > > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> > > fraudulent disinheritance
> > > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > > - END OF CHARGES -
> > > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> > > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> > > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> > > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> > > have to provide grounds.
> > > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> > > which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> > > documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> > > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> > > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> > > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> > > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > --
> > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide quoted
> > text -
I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
called into question after all.
On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> comment on it here.
> A Reminder.
> All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> Saint Onan.
> OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> genocide charges.
> The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> heavens above, on the following charges.
> All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact numbers
> unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> cleansing.
> 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
> thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
> 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
> - Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
> God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> made false representation to at least one party.
> Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> all eternity from any academy of science.
> CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper. The
> Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> CHARGE: Indecent Exposure
> -Exodus 33:17-23
> In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as trifling
> in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can be
> exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> Civil Actions
> ---------------
> Balaam vs. God
> The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually the
> plaintiff's life.
> This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant and
> his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> power of speech prior to delivery.
> Onan vs. God
> The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> interest at this point.
> (Genesis 38:7-10)
> Lucifer vs. God
> Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> Esau vs. God
> Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> fraudulent disinheritance
> (Genesis 25:29-34)
> - END OF CHARGES -
> At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> have to provide grounds.
> ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> admissions; and (4) depositions.
> On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
> sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> called into question after all.
> On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> > comment on it here.
> > A Reminder.
> > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > Saint Onan.
> > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> > genocide charges.
> > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact numbers
> > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> > cleansing.
> > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
> > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
> > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> > CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
> > - Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
> > God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> > made false representation to at least one party.
> > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper. The
> > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> > In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as trifling
> > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can be
> > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > Civil Actions
> > ---------------
> > Balaam vs. God
> > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually the
> > plaintiff's life.
> > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant and
> > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > Onan vs. God
> > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> > interest at this point.
> > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > Lucifer vs. God
> > Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> > - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> > Esau vs. God
> > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> > fraudulent disinheritance
> > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > - END OF CHARGES -
> > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> > have to provide grounds.
> > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> > which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> > documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > --
> > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103
Fellow juror: Can you not express your biased opinions in response?
After all, that is what makes up the meat of the prosecutions case. If
facts were a prerequisite of the trial, there wouldn't be one.
On Oct 20, 12:10 pm, "Daniel T." <danie...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
> sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> called into question after all.
> On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> > comment on it here.
> > A Reminder.
> > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > Saint Onan.
> > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> > genocide charges.
> > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact numbers
> > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> > cleansing.
> > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
> > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
> > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> > CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
> > - Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
> > God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> > made false representation to at least one party.
> > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper. The
> > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> > In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as trifling
> > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can be
> > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > Civil Actions
> > ---------------
> > Balaam vs. God
> > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually the
> > plaintiff's life.
> > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant and
> > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > Onan vs. God
> > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> > interest at this point.
> > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > Lucifer vs. God
> > Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> > - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> > Esau vs. God
> > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> > fraudulent disinheritance
> > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > - END OF CHARGES -
> > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> > have to provide grounds.
> > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> > which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> > documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, now we are bringing genetics into it. I guess there must be
proof that "god" is indeed the "Bearded One", but since this is a
trial, this juror would like to see genetic DNA substantiating that
"god" has moving parts in its mid section.
On Oct 21, 2:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
> > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> > called into question after all.
> Why? Isn't he supposed to Omnipresent?
I think we will have to wait until the evidence starts being
discussed.
I don't know if it is possible to add to the charge sheet at this
stage, but my cousin feels that some of the remarks the defendant made
about same-sex love have contributed to difficulties for her and her
partner finding social acceptance, put her at increased risk of
violence, and contributed to emotional difficulties she experienced
while growing up.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
> > > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
> > > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> > > called into question after all.
> > Why? Isn't he supposed to Omnipresent?
> I think we will have to wait until the evidence starts being
> discussed.
> I don't know if it is possible to add to the charge sheet at this
> stage, but my cousin feels that some of the remarks the defendant made
> about same-sex love have contributed to difficulties for her and her
> partner finding social acceptance, put her at increased risk of
> violence, and contributed to emotional difficulties she experienced
> while growing up.
Rupert, just so I can catch up on what "god" had to say about same sex
marriage, can you quote the book/chapter/verse on it? Hopefully the
book isn't in a person's name, so we can actually trace the origin of
the words back to "god", and that it was not just some prudish man
making these harmful statements.
On Oct 20, 3:51 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
> > > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> > > called into question after all.
> > Why? Isn't he supposed to Omnipresent?
> I think we will have to wait until the evidence starts being
> discussed.
> I don't know if it is possible to add to the charge sheet at this
> stage, but my cousin feels that some of the remarks the defendant made
> about same-sex love have contributed to difficulties for her and her
> partner finding social acceptance, put her at increased risk of
> violence, and contributed to emotional difficulties she experienced
> while growing up.
On Oct 21, 7:15 am, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Rupert, just so I can catch up on what "god" had to say about same sex
> marriage, can you quote the book/chapter/verse on it? Hopefully the
> book isn't in a person's name, so we can actually trace the origin of
> the words back to "god", and that it was not just some prudish man
> making these harmful statements.
I agree that this certainly sounds like the rantings of mad men,
although placing those words on the tongue of somebody that nobody has
seen is a bit much to consume. The whole concept of this trial seems a
bit suspect to me however, since the ones that are putting the
defendent on trial, don't even believe "he" exists. Ah well. I guess
its all for fun :-)
On Oct 20, 5:33 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 21, 7:15 am, showmethehoney <alenasha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Rupert, just so I can catch up on what "god" had to say about same sex
> > marriage, can you quote the book/chapter/verse on it? Hopefully the
> > book isn't in a person's name, so we can actually trace the origin of
> > the words back to "god", and that it was not just some prudish man
> > making these harmful statements.
On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IThe Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> heavens above, on the following charges
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:00 PM, dali_70 <w_e_coyot...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > IThe Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> > heavens above, on the following charges
I googled this concept after reading the thread and found that the
'trial of God' has a pretty interesting history.
In Elie Wiesel's play 'the Trial of God' stages a trial of God by
Jews in 1649, after having their Jewish community massacred in an anti-
Jewish riot, and after a spirited defense by a stranger, they find God
to be innocent - and later that God's defense attorney was Satan.
And most moving imho, is that Wiesel based his play on a true story
from Auschwitz, where Wiesel witnesses when 'three rabbis – all
erudite and pious men – decided one winter evening to indict God for
allowing his children to be massacred."
It happened at night; there were just three people. At the end of the
trial, they used the word chayav, rather than ‘guilty'. It means ‘He
owes us something'. Then we went to pray."
Also found this more humorous take on God's trial at wiki:
"In the US state of Nebraska, State Senator Ernie Chambers filed a
suit against God seeking an injunction, in an effort to highlight the
issue of public access to the court system.[1] The suit was dismissed
due to the fact that God could not be properly notified, having no
address. "
On Oct 20, 2:51 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
> > > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> > > called into question after all.
> > Why? Isn't he supposed to Omnipresent?
> I think we will have to wait until the evidence starts being
> discussed.
> I don't know if it is possible to add to the charge sheet at this
> stage, but my cousin feels that some of the remarks the defendant made
> about same-sex love have contributed to difficulties for her and her
> partner finding social acceptance, put her at increased risk of
> violence, and contributed to emotional difficulties she experienced
> while growing up.
> I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> comment on it here.
> A Reminder.
> All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> Saint Onan.
> OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> genocide charges.
> The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> heavens above, on the following charges.
> All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact numbers
> unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> cleansing.
> 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
> thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
> 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
> - Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
> God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> made false representation to at least one party.
> Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> all eternity from any academy of science.
> CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper. The
> Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> CHARGE: Indecent Exposure
> -Exodus 33:17-23
> In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as trifling
> in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can be
> exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> Civil Actions
> ---------------
> Balaam vs. God
> The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually the
> plaintiff's life.
> This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant and
> his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> power of speech prior to delivery.
> Onan vs. God
> The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> interest at this point.
> (Genesis 38:7-10)
> Lucifer vs. God
> Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> Esau vs. God
> Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> fraudulent disinheritance
> (Genesis 25:29-34)
> - END OF CHARGES -
> At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> have to provide grounds.
> ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> admissions; and (4) depositions.
> On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
klytu: Is the Defendant required to appear in court or is this trial
by deposition only? Are we considered to be a jury of His peers? If
not, how can He get a fair trial?
> klytu: Is the Defendant required to appear in court or is this trial > by deposition only? Are we considered to be a jury of His peers? If > not, how can He get a fair trial?
If its a jury of his peers that's needed then we all need to adopt characters from other fictions.
I'll be Alice's Queen.
"Off with his head".
-- No Gods, No Masters
"Believing there is no God gives me more room for belief in family, people, love, truth, beauty, sex, Jell-o, and all the other things I can prove and that make this life the best life I will ever have." [Penn Jillette]
On Oct 20, 9:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
> > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> > called into question after all.
> > On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> > > comment on it here.
> > > A Reminder.
> > > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> > > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> > > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > > Saint Onan.
> > > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> > > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> > > genocide charges.
> > > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> > > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact numbers
> > > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> > > cleansing.
> > > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
> > > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
> > > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> > > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> > > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> > > CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
> > > - Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
> > > God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> > > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> > > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> > > made false representation to at least one party.
> > > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> > > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper. The
> > > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> > > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> > > In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> > > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> > > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> > > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as trifling
> > > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> > > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can be
> > > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > > Civil Actions
> > > ---------------
> > > Balaam vs. God
> > > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> > > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually the
> > > plaintiff's life.
> > > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> > > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant and
> > > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> > > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > > Onan vs. God
> > > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> > > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> > > interest at this point.
> > > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > > Lucifer vs. God
> > > Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> > > - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> > > Esau vs. God
> > > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> > > fraudulent disinheritance
> > > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > > - END OF CHARGES -
> > > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> > > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> > > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> > > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> > > have to provide grounds.
> > > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> > > which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> > > documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> > > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> > > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> > > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> > > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > --
> > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> On Oct 20, 9:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
> > > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
> > > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> > > called into question after all.
> > > On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> > > > comment on it here.
> > > > A Reminder.
> > > > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> > > > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> > > > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > > > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > > > Saint Onan.
> > > > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> > > > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> > > > genocide charges.
> > > > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > > > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> > > > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > > > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact
> numbers
> > > > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > > > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > > > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> > > > cleansing.
> > > > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth
> give
> > > > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that
> breatheth:
> > > > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> > > > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> > > > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > > > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > > > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > > > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> > > > CHARGE: Culpable Negligence
> > > > - Establishing competing Jewish and Arabian tribes (Genesis 17:19-20)
> > > > God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> > > > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> > > > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> > > > made false representation to at least one party.
> > > > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > > > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> > > > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > > > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > > > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > > > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper.
> The
> > > > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> > > > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> > > > In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> > > > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> > > > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> > > > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > > > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as
> trifling
> > > > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> > > > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > > > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can
> be
> > > > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > > > Civil Actions
> > > > ---------------
> > > > Balaam vs. God
> > > > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> > > > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually
> the
> > > > plaintiff's life.
> > > > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> > > > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > > > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant
> and
> > > > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> > > > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > > > Onan vs. God
> > > > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> > > > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> > > > interest at this point.
> > > > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > > > Lucifer vs. God
> > > > Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> > > > - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> > > > Esau vs. God
> > > > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> > > > fraudulent disinheritance
> > > > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > > > - END OF CHARGES -
> > > > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> > > > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> > > > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> > > > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> > > > have to provide grounds.
> > > > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > > > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> > > > which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> > > > documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> > > > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> > > > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > > > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> > > > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> > > > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > > > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > --
> > > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103
> > --
> > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > God Is A Ribbon!
> > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide quoted
> text -
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 9:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net>
> > wrote:
> > > > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire charge
> > > > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> > > > called into question after all.
> > > > On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people can
> > > > > comment on it here.
> > > > > A Reminder.
> > > > > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief Justice,
> > > > > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the Court
> > > > > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > > > > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > > > > Saint Onan.
> > > > > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> > > > > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> > > > > genocide charges.
> > > > > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > > > > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address the
> > > > > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > > > > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact
> > numbers
> > > > > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > > > > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > > > > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating ethnic
> > > > > cleansing.
> > > > > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth
> > give
> > > > > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that
> > breatheth:
> > > > > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the
> > > > > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the
> > > > > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > > > > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > > > > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > > > > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> > > > > God appears to have established two nations, and then informed both
> > > > > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying the
> > > > > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must have
> > > > > made false representation to at least one party.
> > > > > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > > > > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned for
> > > > > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > > > > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > > > > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > > > > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as Stryper.
> > The
> > > > > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> > > > > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the Lord."
> > > > > In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards, the
> > > > > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his prophet
> > > > > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was seen to
> > > > > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > > > > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as
> > trifling
> > > > > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution contends
> > > > > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > > > > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that can
> > be
> > > > > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > > > > Civil Actions
> > > > > ---------------
> > > > > Balaam vs. God
> > > > > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of Promise,
> > > > > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and eventually
> > the
> > > > > plaintiff's life.
> > > > > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the verbal
> > > > > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > > > > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the Defendant
> > and
> > > > > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> > > > > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > > > > Onan vs. God
> > > > > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> > > > > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> > > > > interest at this point.
> > > > > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > > > > Lucifer vs. God
> > > > > Plaintiff alleges Illegal dispossession of habitat
> > > > > - Isiah 14:12-20, Revelation 12:7-9
> > > > > Esau vs. God
> > > > > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning of a
> > > > > fraudulent disinheritance
> > > > > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > > > > - END OF CHARGES -
> > > > > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether they
> > > > > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> > > > > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery process.
> > > > > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you do
> > > > > have to provide grounds.
> > > > > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > > > > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> > > > > which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> > > > > documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the
> > > > > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery
> > > > > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > > > > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1) interrogatories;
> > > > > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests for
> > > > > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > > > > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > > > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103
> > > --
> > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide quoted
> > text -
> On Oct 20, 4:35 pm, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com
> >wrote:
> > > On Oct 20, 9:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire
> charge
> > > > > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> > > > > called into question after all.
> > > > Why? Isn't he supposed to Omnipresent?
> > > I'm right here, watching over everything.
> > My point exactly :-)
> You'll be hearing from my lawyer.
I certainly hope so. OldMan has to respond to the charges :-)
> > > > > On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people
> can
> > > > > > comment on it here.
> > > > > > A Reminder.
> > > > > > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief
> Justice,
> > > > > > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the
> Court
> > > > > > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > > > > > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > > > > > Saint Onan.
> > > > > > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> > > > > > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> > > > > > genocide charges.
> > > > > > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > > > > > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address
> the
> > > > > > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > > > > > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact
> > > numbers
> > > > > > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > > > > > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > > > > > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating
> ethnic
> > > > > > cleansing.
> > > > > > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth
> > > give
> > > > > > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that
> > > breatheth:
> > > > > > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and
> the
> > > > > > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and
> the
> > > > > > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > > > > > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > > > > > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > > > > > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> > > > > > God appears to have established two nations, and then informed
> both
> > > > > > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying
> the
> > > > > > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must
> have
> > > > > > made false representation to at least one party.
> > > > > > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > > > > > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned
> for
> > > > > > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > > > > > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > > > > > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > > > > > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as
> Stryper.
> > > The
> > > > > > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> > > > > > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the
> Lord."
> > > > > > In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards,
> the
> > > > > > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his
> prophet
> > > > > > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was
> seen to
> > > > > > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > > > > > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as
> > > trifling
> > > > > > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution
> contends
> > > > > > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > > > > > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that
> can
> > > be
> > > > > > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > > > > > Civil Actions
> > > > > > ---------------
> > > > > > Balaam vs. God
> > > > > > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of
> Promise,
> > > > > > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and
> eventually
> > > the
> > > > > > plaintiff's life.
> > > > > > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the
> verbal
> > > > > > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > > > > > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the
> Defendant
> > > and
> > > > > > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> > > > > > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > > > > > Onan vs. God
> > > > > > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> > > > > > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> > > > > > interest at this point.
> > > > > > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > > > > > Esau vs. God
> > > > > > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning
> of a
> > > > > > fraudulent disinheritance
> > > > > > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > > > > > - END OF CHARGES -
> > > > > > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether
> they
> > > > > > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> > > > > > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery
> process.
> > > > > > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you
> do
> > > > > > have to provide grounds.
> > > > > > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > > > > > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> > > > > > which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> > > > > > documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel
> the
> > > > > > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other
> discovery
> > > > > > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > > > > > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1)
> interrogatories;
> > > > > > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests
> for
> > > > > > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > > > > > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > > > > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103
> > > > --
> > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide
> quoted
> > > text -
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> > --
> > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > God Is A Ribbon!
> > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide quoted
> text -
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 4:35 pm, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > > > On Oct 20, 9:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <danie...@earthlink.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire
> > charge
> > > > > > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant is
> > > > > > called into question after all.
> > > > > Why? Isn't he supposed to Omnipresent?
> > > > I'm right here, watching over everything.
> > > My point exactly :-)
> > You'll be hearing from my lawyer.
> I certainly hope so. OldMan has to respond to the charges :-)
Shouldn't there be a separate client/attourney discussion thread? You
know, so I can offically tell him to fight the charges? And that he
knows my history well, and I trust his abilites? And any other
conferring we may need to have during the trial (and I'm not planning
on much conferring - but some may come up)? And it should be limited
(i.e. moderated) to just the two of us.
> > > > > > On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that people
> > can
> > > > > > > comment on it here.
> > > > > > > A Reminder.
> > > > > > > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief
> > Justice,
> > > > > > > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or the
> > Court
> > > > > > > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > > > > > > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > > > > > > Saint Onan.
> > > > > > > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new charges
> > > > > > > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore the
> > > > > > > genocide charges.
> > > > > > > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka "The
> > > > > > > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known address
> > the
> > > > > > > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > > > > > > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered. Exact
> > > > numbers
> > > > > > > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > > > > > > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > > > > > > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating
> > ethnic
> > > > > > > cleansing.
> > > > > > > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth
> > > > give
> > > > > > > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that
> > > > breatheth:
> > > > > > > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and
> > the
> > > > > > > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and
> > the
> > > > > > > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > > > > > > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > > > > > > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > > > > > > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a debt.
> > > > > > > God appears to have established two nations, and then informed
> > both
> > > > > > > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status, laying
> > the
> > > > > > > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God must
> > have
> > > > > > > made false representation to at least one party.
> > > > > > > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > > > > > > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority banned
> > for
> > > > > > > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > > > > > > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > > > > > > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > > > > > > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as
> > Stryper.
> > > > The
> > > > > > > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant. The
> > > > > > > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the
> > Lord."
> > > > > > > In willful contravention of then prevailing community standards,
> > the
> > > > > > > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his
> > prophet
> > > > > > > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was
> > seen to
> > > > > > > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > > > > > > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as
> > > > trifling
> > > > > > > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution
> > contends
> > > > > > > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > > > > > > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty that
> > can
> > > > be
> > > > > > > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > > > > > > Civil Actions
> > > > > > > ---------------
> > > > > > > Balaam vs. God
> > > > > > > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of
> > Promise,
> > > > > > > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and
> > eventually
> > > > the
> > > > > > > plaintiff's life.
> > > > > > > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of the
> > verbal
> > > > > > > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > > > > > > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the
> > Defendant
> > > > and
> > > > > > > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of the
> > > > > > > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > > > > > > Onan vs. God
> > > > > > > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and unreasonable
> > > > > > > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a personal
> > > > > > > interest at this point.
> > > > > > > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > > > > > > Esau vs. God
> > > > > > > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the sanctioning
> > of a
> > > > > > > fraudulent disinheritance
> > > > > > > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > > > > > > - END OF CHARGES -
> > > > > > > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether
> > they
> > > > > > > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they plan to
> > > > > > > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery
> > process.
> > > > > > > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but you
> > do
> > > > > > > have to provide grounds.
> > > > > > > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > > > > > > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in
> > > > > > > which each party through the law of civil procedure can request
> > > > > > > documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel
> > the
> > > > > > > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other
> > discovery
> > > > > > > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > > > > > > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1)
> > interrogatories;
> > > > > > > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3) requests
> > for
> > > > > > > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > > > > > > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > > > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > > > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > > > > > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103
> > > > > --
> > > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > > > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide
> > quoted
> > > > text -
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
> > > --
> > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide quoted
> > text -
> On Oct 20, 4:49 pm, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com
> >wrote:
> > > On Oct 20, 4:35 pm, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Neil Kelsey <
> neil_kel...@hotmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > > > On Oct 20, 9:17 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Daniel T. <
> danie...@earthlink.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > I'm not so sure I can make an unbiased jury member. The entire
> > > charge
> > > > > > > sheet is based on hearsay. The very existence of the defendant
> is
> > > > > > > called into question after all.
> > > > > > Why? Isn't he supposed to Omnipresent?
> > > > > I'm right here, watching over everything.
> > > > My point exactly :-)
> > > You'll be hearing from my lawyer.
> > I certainly hope so. OldMan has to respond to the charges :-)
> Shouldn't there be a separate client/attourney discussion thread? You
> know, so I can offically tell him to fight the charges? And that he
> knows my history well, and I trust his abilites? And any other
> conferring we may need to have during the trial (and I'm not planning
> on much conferring - but some may come up)? And it should be limited
> (i.e. moderated) to just the two of us.
> > > > > > > On Oct 20, 10:29 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > I've copied the Charge Sheet to the Jury Thread so that
> people
> > > can
> > > > > > > > comment on it here.
> > > > > > > > A Reminder.
> > > > > > > > All posts to the Trial thread which are not from the Chief
> > > Justice,
> > > > > > > > Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, God's representative Neil, or
> the
> > > Court
> > > > > > > > Coordinator Trance will be removed.
> > > > > > > > This is the thread where everyone else can comment.
> > > > > > > > Saint Onan.
> > > > > > > > OK, sorry for the delay. I've tried to present a few new
> charges
> > > > > > > > rather than the same old talking points, but I can't ignore
> the
> > > > > > > > genocide charges.
> > > > > > > > The Prosecution indicts God, aka Yahweh, aka The LORD, aka
> "The
> > > > > > > > Bearded One", aka Hughie, aka 'im Upstairs, of last known
> address
> > > the
> > > > > > > > heavens above, on the following charges.
> > > > > > > > All humanity, bar four males and four females, murdered.
> Exact
> > > > > numbers
> > > > > > > > unknown but in percentage terms greater than 99.99%
> > > > > > > > ii) The Israelite conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 20:16-17)
> > > > > > > > Here are the orders issued by God to his adherents, dictating
> > > ethnic
> > > > > > > > cleansing.
> > > > > > > > 16But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God
> doth
> > > > > give
> > > > > > > > thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that
> > > > > breatheth:
> > > > > > > > 17But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites,
> and
> > > the
> > > > > > > > Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites,
> and
> > > the
> > > > > > > > Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
> > > > > > > > CHARGE: Accessory to Murder
> > > > > > > > - Jephthah's sacrifice of his daughter (Judges 11:30-40)
> > > > > > > > God accepts payment in the form of human sacrifice for a
> debt.
> > > > > > > > God appears to have established two nations, and then
> informed
> > > both
> > > > > > > > that they were entitled to "Most Favoured Nation" status,
> laying
> > > the
> > > > > > > > grounds for future wars. The Prosecution contends that God
> must
> > > have
> > > > > > > > made false representation to at least one party.
> > > > > > > > Not strictly a crime, but the Prosecution wants an injunction
> > > > > > > > preventing any material citing this deity as an authority
> banned
> > > for
> > > > > > > > all eternity from any academy of science.
> > > > > > > > CHARGE: Artistic Desecration
> > > > > > > > - make a joyful noise unto the Lord (Psalm 98:4)
> > > > > > > > This instruction has inspired such cultural atrocities as
> > > Stryper.
> > > > > The
> > > > > > > > Prosecution contends negligence on the part of the defendant.
> The
> > > > > > > > instruction should have been "make a TUNEFUL noise unto the
> > > Lord."
> > > > > > > > In willful contravention of then prevailing community
> standards,
> > > the
> > > > > > > > defendant presented his uncovered buttocks to the gaze of his
> > > prophet
> > > > > > > > Moses. Witnesses were later to record that Mr Moses' face was
> > > seen to
> > > > > > > > "shine" from accumulated exposure to the divine mooning.
> > > > > > > > While the Court may be inclined to dismiss this indictment as
> > > > > trifling
> > > > > > > > in comparison to the more heinous charges, the Prosecution
> > > contends
> > > > > > > > that it is important that this charge proceeds, given that a
> > > > > > > > successful conviction will levy the sole effective penalty
> that
> > > can
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > exerted against an omnipotent deity, namely loss of dignity.
> > > > > > > > Civil Actions
> > > > > > > > ---------------
> > > > > > > > Balaam vs. God
> > > > > > > > The Plaintiff alleges Unconscionable Conduct and Breach of
> > > Promise,
> > > > > > > > resulting in loss of livelihood, reputation, family and
> > > eventually
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > plaintiff's life.
> > > > > > > > This occurred despite the Plaintiff honouring all terms of
> the
> > > verbal
> > > > > > > > contract in full. (Numbers 23-24, Numbers 31:7-9)
> > > > > > > > As compensation, the Plaintiff requests the asses of the
> > > Defendant
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > his firstborn son. Said compensation to be rendered bereft of
> the
> > > > > > > > power of speech prior to delivery.
> > > > > > > > Onan vs. God
> > > > > > > > The Plaintiff alleges unreasonable conditions and
> unreasonable
> > > > > > > > invasion of privacy. Although I may have to declare a
> personal
> > > > > > > > interest at this point.
> > > > > > > > (Genesis 38:7-10)
> > > > > > > > Esau vs. God
> > > > > > > > Plaintiff alleges complicity by the defendant in the
> sanctioning
> > > of a
> > > > > > > > fraudulent disinheritance
> > > > > > > > (Genesis 25:29-34)
> > > > > > > > - END OF CHARGES -
> > > > > > > > At this point I think defense counsel should indicate whether
> > > they
> > > > > > > > intend to contest the charges, and cite any evidence they
> plan to
> > > > > > > > present. In legal terminology, I think this is the discovery
> > > process.
> > > > > > > > You may petition the Court to have the charges dismissed, but
> you
> > > do
> > > > > > > > have to provide grounds.
> > > > > > > > ===== WIKIPEDIA =====
> > > > > > > > In American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a
> lawsuit in
> > > > > > > > which each party through the law of civil procedure can
> request
> > > > > > > > documents and other evidence from other parties and can
> compel
> > > the
> > > > > > > > production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other
> > > discovery
> > > > > > > > devices, such as requests for production of documents, and
> > > > > > > > depositions. In other words, discovery includes (1)
> > > interrogatories;
> > > > > > > > (2) motions or requests for production of documents; (3)
> requests
> > > for
> > > > > > > > admissions; and (4) depositions.
> > > > > > > > On Oct 19, 7:27 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > > > > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > > > > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > > > > > > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > > > > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide
> > > quoted
> > > > > text -
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> > > > --
> > > > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > > > God Is A Ribbon!
> > > > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> > > science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide
> quoted
> > > text -
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> > --
> > High Priestess of Ribbonology
> > God Is A Ribbon!
> > All Hail The Great Ribbon In The Skyhttp://
> science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/15oct_ibex.htm?list1303103- Hide quoted
> text -
|
