Web Images News Groups Books Scholar Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Suggestion for a new Bible
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 35 of 35 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
A Query  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 7:01 am
From: A Query <djb...@uow.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:01:20 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 7:01 am
Subject: Re: Suggestion for a new Bible

On Nov 4, 12:40 pm, Simon Ewins <sjew...@gmail.com> wrote:

> [A Query]

> > Why do you keep avoiding my question?

> I am not ready to answer it yet. I need to know who I am dealing with, if they are going to be able to understand my answers.

> Why do you keep avoiding my question?

Because I shouldn't have to answer. My views aren't the issue here.
I'm asking you to defend your position and so far you have been unable
to do that. Let me ask you again:

Do you expect that others would agree with you about what you think is
*good*? Why do you expect this?

What basis do you have for your assumption that what you think is
*good* really is *good* in an objective sense?


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon Ewins  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 7:05 am
From: Simon Ewins <sjew...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:05:35 -0500
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 7:05 am
Subject: Re: [AvC] Re: Suggestion for a new Bible

[A Query]

> Because I shouldn't have to answer. My views aren't the issue here.
> I'm asking you to defend your position and so far you have been unable
> to do that.

I am not unable, in fact I am trying to start. I'm trying, but I can't demonstrate anything unless you answer mine.

So, I will start to answer your question, through a series of questions that will show you the answer, if you are really interested in the answer, that is.

Do you accept or deny that all those verses are good?

--
"However many holy words you read, however many you speak,
 what good will they do you if you do not act on upon them?"
[Buddha]

Virtual Gods: http://users3.jabry.com/sjewins/library/__philorelig.htm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
A Query  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 7:28 am
From: A Query <djb...@uow.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:28:19 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 7:28 am
Subject: Re: Suggestion for a new Bible

On Nov 4, 1:05 pm, Simon Ewins <sjew...@gmail.com> wrote:

> [A Query]

> > Because I shouldn't have to answer. My views aren't the issue here.
> > I'm asking you to defend your position and so far you have been unable
> > to do that.

> I am not unable, in fact I am trying to start. I'm trying, but I can't demonstrate anything unless you answer mine.

> So, I will start to answer your question, through a series of questions that will show you the answer, if you are really interested in the answer, that is.

> Do you accept or deny that all those verses are good?

Of course I accept that they are good. The purpose of this exercise
was to try and show you that you have no right to make such claims on
an atheistic worldview. My position is this: I believe that such
things as good and evil exist. I believe in an objective moral reality
grounded in the existence of God. Hence I believe that morality is
contingent on the existence of God. I therefore believe I can make
claims about what is good and evil only because such things exist, and
only because they find their root in a transcendent, perfectly good
being.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon Ewins  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 7:46 am
From: Simon Ewins <sjew...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:46:49 -0500
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 7:46 am
Subject: Re: [AvC] Re: Suggestion for a new Bible

>> Do you accept or deny that all those verses are good?

[A Query]

> Of course I accept that they are good. The purpose of this exercise
> was to try and show you that you have no right to make such claims on
> an atheistic worldview.

It is my thread, I'll decide what its purpose is.

So, wonderful, see? We already agree on a lot of things that are good. What about bad?

Do you agree that all these are bad?

-------------------
1: Rudeness.

(Mark 7:25 NRSV) but a woman whose little daughter had an unclean spirit immediately heard about him, and she came and bowed down at his feet.

(Mark 7:26 NRSV) Now the woman was a Gentile, of Syrophoenician origin. She begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter.

(Mark 7:27 NRSV) He said to her, "Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children?s food and throw it to the dogs."

--------------------
2: Sending someone important to you to be raped.

(Judg 19:22 NRSV) While they were enjoying themselves, the men of the city, a perverse lot, surrounded the house, and started pounding on the door. They said to the old man, the master of the house, "Bring out the man who came into your house, so that we may have intercourse with him."

(Judg 19:24 NRSV) (The old man) Here are my virgin daughter and his concubine; let me bring them out now. Ravish them and do whatever you want to them; but against this man do not
do such a vile thing."

(Judg 19:25 NRSV) ? So the man seized his concubine, and put her out to them. They wantonly raped her, and abused her all through the night until the morning. And as the dawn began
to break, they let her go.

--------------------
3: Violence against children.

(Judg 21:10 NRSV) So the congregation sent twelve thousand soldiers there and commanded them, "Go, put the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead to the sword, including the women and the little ones.

--------------------
4: Inequality of women.

(1 Tim 2:9-12 NRSV) also that the women should dress themselves modestly and decently in suitable clothing, not with their hair braided, or with gold, pearls, or expensive clothes, ?

Let a woman learn in silence with full submission.

I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent.

--------------------
5: Murder and theft to pay off a debt.

(Judg 14:19 KJV) And the spirit of the LORD came upon him, and he went down to Ashkelon, and slew thirty men of them, and took their spoil, and gave change of garments unto them which expounded the riddle?

Only five things from the Bible and now just one that is mentioned nowhere in the Bible:

Pedophilia. Bad?

Do we also, agree, then on just 6 things that are bad?

--
"However many holy words you read, however many you speak,
 what good will they do you if you do not act on upon them?"
[Buddha]

Virtual Gods: http://users3.jabry.com/sjewins/library/__philorelig.htm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
A Query  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 8:04 am
From: A Query <djb...@uow.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:04:17 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 8:04 am
Subject: Re: Suggestion for a new Bible
You are still blatantly refusing to answer my questions, and now you
try to divert the discussion into an irrelevant assessment of my own
view. If you will not my questions, I will not answer yours.

On Nov 4, 1:46 pm, Simon Ewins <sjew...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> Do you accept or deny that all those verses are good?

> [A Query]

> > Of course I accept that they are good. The purpose of this exercise
> > was to try and show you that you have no right to make such claims on
> > an atheistic worldview.

> It is my thread, I'll decide what its purpose is.

> So, wonderful, see? We already agree on a lot of things that are good.

Unfortunately, I don't believe you have any right to agree with me on
what is *good* on an atheistic worldview. Furthermore you haven't
given me any indication that you can at all account for the reality of
good and evil which you are assuming here. Before we go any further,
you need to defend your original assertion, which I have asked you to
do many times. I will not engage with you if you continue to refuse to
defend your assumptions about good and evil.

What about bad?


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon Ewins  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 8:09 am
From: Simon Ewins <sjew...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:09:47 -0500
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 8:09 am
Subject: Re: [AvC] Re: Suggestion for a new Bible

[A Query]

> You are still blatantly refusing to answer my questions, and now you
> try to divert the discussion into an irrelevant assessment of my own
> view. If you will not my questions, I will not answer yours.

Well, Grasshopper, there are many ways to answer a question and the best way is to begin with understanding common ground first. When we know what we share then we can decide whether there are really any differences and, if so, why.

So, I actually am answering your question. So far you and I agree completely on what is good. I want to see if we agree on what is bad. Then we can discuss why. If you are afraid of where this may lead I fully understand your reticence.

Have a good evening.

--
"However many holy words you read, however many you speak,
 what good will they do you if you do not act on upon them?"
[Buddha]

Virtual Gods: http://users3.jabry.com/sjewins/library/__philorelig.htm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon Ewins  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 8:12 am
From: Simon Ewins <sjew...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:12:23 -0500
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 8:12 am
Subject: Re: [AvC] Re: Suggestion for a new Bible

[A Query]

> Unfortunately, I don't believe you have any right to agree with me on
> what is *good* on an atheistic worldview. Furthermore you haven't
> given me any indication that you can at all account for the reality of
> good and evil which you are assuming here. Before we go any further,
> you need to defend your original assertion, which I have asked you to
> do many times. I will not engage with you if you continue to refuse to
> defend your assumptions about good and evil.

Two different things so a second reply.

Why do you assume that my 'world-view' is atheistic?

Be patient, I believe that your beliefs teach you that it is a virtue.

--
"However many holy words you read, however many you speak,
 what good will they do you if you do not act on upon them?"
[Buddha]

Virtual Gods: http://users3.jabry.com/sjewins/library/__philorelig.htm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
philosophy  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 1:47 pm
From: philosophy <smwil...@tpg.com.au>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 1:47 pm
Subject: Re: Suggestion for a new Bible

On Nov 4, 11:35 am, Diana Wilson <dwilso...@gmail.com> wrote:

> When I figured out that god didn't exist....and declared myself an
> Atheist...nothing happened. I did not rape my dog, kill my little brother,
> start robbing banks....or go insane. I am the very same person...only now I
> live in a state of reality and that makes me very very happy.

I'm glad to hear it.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
LL  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5, 1:36 am
From: LL <llp...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 1:36 am
Subject: Re: Suggestion for a new Bible

On Nov 3, 5:35 pm, Diana Wilson <dwilso...@gmail.com> wrote:

> When I figured out that god didn't exist....and declared myself an
> Atheist...nothing happened. I did not rape my dog, kill my little brother,
> start robbing banks....or go insane. I am the very same person...only now I
> live in a state of reality and that makes me very very happy.

LL: Too bad more theists can't get themselves over that particular
"hump." It shows how indoctrination keeps the brain from developing.

********


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
LL  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5, 1:38 am
From: LL <llp...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:38:14 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 1:38 am
Subject: Re: Suggestion for a new Bible

On Nov 3, 5:50 pm, A Query <djb...@uow.edu.au> wrote:

> Of course nothing happened. If it did, it would mean your morality was
> contingent on you *believing* in God. But this is obviously absurd.
> There are many people who don't believe in God who do what is
> biblically good. Rather, I would suggest that morality is contingent
> on the existence of God; that is, if objective moral values exist,
> then God exists. Your morality has nothing to do with whether you
> *believe* that God exists or not, but with whether God really does
> exist.

LL: How would anyone know? Since we can't know, the existence or non-
existence of any god has absolutely no effect on humans.

******************************

***************************


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google