SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here is kind of fun.
Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the regulars know these things about him.
(1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a waste of time."
(2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
(3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a lie.
I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better place if something were to "happen" though.
And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
On Sep 2, 11:31 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > is kind of fun.
> Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > regulars know these things about him.
> (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > waste of time."
> (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > lie.
> I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > place if something were to "happen" though.
> And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
> On Sep 2, 11:31 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > is kind of fun.
> > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > regulars know these things about him.
> > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > waste of time."
> > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > lie.
> > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.- Hide quoted text -
Pleased to meet you! I'm sorry if you think I go a little too far with my nickname of "knowital" I'm keeping it, though, because it reminds me that no one likes a know-it -all, ...
Keith A. MacNevins
"knowital" "
That was Fri Jul 1, 2005 ... nothing much has changed in the past 26 months has it Keith?
On Sep 2, 11:31 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > is kind of fun.
> Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > regulars know these things about him.
> (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > waste of time."
> (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > lie.
> I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > place if something were to "happen" though.
> And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
Dev you have been on a classic rant the past few days and it is quite enjoyable to watch :-) Happy Labor Day weekend and have a drink or six on me :-)
On Sep 2, 9:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > is kind of fun.
> Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > regulars know these things about him.
> (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > waste of time."
> (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > lie.
> I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > place if something were to "happen" though.
> And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
Yeah, I've noticed I've been more pissed off than usual. Oh well. :)
On Sep 2, 11:49 am, Delusional? <dtatu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dev you have been on a classic rant the past few days and it is quite > enjoyable to watch :-) Happy Labor Day weekend and have a drink or > six on me :-)
> On Sep 2, 9:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > is kind of fun.
> > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > regulars know these things about him.
> > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > waste of time."
> > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > lie.
> > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.- Hide quoted text -
On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > is kind of fun.
> Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > regulars know these things about him.
> (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > waste of time."
> (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > lie.
> I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > place if something were to "happen" though.
> And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
He has admitted more than once that he is just trying to stir things up. I think every time you go after him you are just feeding his ego.
On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > is kind of fun.
> Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > regulars know these things about him.
> (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > waste of time."
> (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > lie.
> I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > place if something were to "happen" though.
> And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
Observer
Keith is so inept that, his posts seldom even rise to the level of *disgusting *.
On Sep 2, 4:55 pm, OldMan <edjarr...@msn.com> wrote:
> On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > is kind of fun.
> > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > regulars know these things about him.
> > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > waste of time."
> > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > lie.
> > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
> He has admitted more than once that he is just trying to stir things > up. I think every time you go after him you are just feeding his > ego.
That may be true, but Keith's crap does absolutely nothing to further the cause of Christians. You and Del do a much better job, you know, posting actual content and what-not.
Well, while you're on-topic I'd hope to think I've done a little better than Hitler as well.
All Christians are not the same person but we all know it seems like they are sometimes. It is disturbing. Del and Oldman can piss me off but neither one of them is Keith. I apologize for my anger towards them but dammit I still don't get how the fact that they're on the wrong side floats over their heads.
Rock on, rappy. And let's hope we pull off this little project of ours. ;)
On Sep 2, 9:56 pm, rappoccio <rappoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 2, 4:55 pm, OldMan <edjarr...@msn.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > > is kind of fun.
> > > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > > regulars know these things about him.
> > > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > > waste of time."
> > > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > > lie.
> > > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
> > He has admitted more than once that he is just trying to stir things > > up. I think every time you go after him you are just feeding his > > ego.
> That may be true, but Keith's crap does absolutely nothing to further > the cause of Christians. You and Del do a much better job, you know, > posting actual content and what-not.- Hide quoted text -
On Sep 2, 8:56 pm, rappoccio <rappoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 2, 4:55 pm, OldMan <edjarr...@msn.com> wrote: > > On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > > is kind of fun.
> > > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > > regulars know these things about him.
> > > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > > waste of time."
> > > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > > lie.
> > > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
> > He has admitted more than once that he is just trying to stir things > > up. I think every time you go after him you are just feeding his > > ego.
> That may be true, but Keith's crap does absolutely nothing to further > the cause of Christians.
I totally agree. Although I suspect he doesn't care.
> You and Del do a much better job, you know, > posting actual content and what-not.- Hide quoted text -
> Pleased to meet you! I'm sorry if you think I go a little too far with > my nickname of "knowital" I'm keeping it, though, because it reminds > me that no one likes a know-it -all, ...
> Keith A. MacNevins
> "knowital" "
> That was Fri Jul 1, 2005 ... nothing much has changed in the past 26 > months has it Keith?
> On Sep 2, 11:31 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > is kind of fun.
> > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > regulars know these things about him.
> > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > waste of time."
> > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > lie.
> > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
-- copyright Ambassador From Hell Keith A. MacNevins Elk Grove Village, IL USA
> Now, don't be hasty, Dev. Where would get such delicious quotes from > if K-Mac leaves?
> On Sep 2, 8:05 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > I've noticed most people just ignore him now. Maybe if I were a bigger > > man I'd do the same.
> > On Sep 2, 9:03 am, Dave <dvor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > He is simply a troll. His only purpose is to manipulate the emotions > > > of others and then feed off of them.
-- copyright Ambassador From Hell Keith A. MacNevins Elk Grove Village, IL USA
On 9/2/07, Delusional? <dtatu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dev you have been on a classic rant the past few days and it is quite > enjoyable to watch :-) Happy Labor Day weekend and have a drink or > six on me :-)
> On Sep 2, 9:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > is kind of fun.
> > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > regulars know these things about him.
> > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > waste of time."
> > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > lie.
> > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
-- copyright Ambassador From Hell Keith A. MacNevins Elk Grove Village, IL USA
"God botherer?" I haven't heard that one before. Well, if you are referring to the fact that I pray I really doubt God is bothered. Atheists don't have a prayer in competition with me.
> On Sep 2, 11:31 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > is kind of fun.
> > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > regulars know these things about him.
> > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > waste of time."
> > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > lie.
> > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
-- copyright Ambassador From Hell Keith A. MacNevins Elk Grove Village, IL USA
My baby picture -- which is of me -- is the cutest baby picture I've ever seen. I wish you could see my blue-eyes and blond hair. I was a holy terror even back then and I broke my mother's nose with a hairbrush while still a baby. I broke the bars on my crib after my father put a fishnet over it to keep me in there at night. I used to climb up on the neighbor's car and jump off the roof of his car when I was barely two. The poor guy saw me out his window and had a heart attack.
> > On Sep 2, 11:31 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > > is kind of fun.
> > > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > > regulars know these things about him.
> > > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > > waste of time."
> > > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > > lie.
> > > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.- > Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
-- copyright Ambassador From Hell Keith A. MacNevins Elk Grove Village, IL USA
> > On Sep 2, 11:31 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > > is kind of fun.
> > > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > > regulars know these things about him.
> > > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > > waste of time."
> > > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > > lie.
> > > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
> -- > copyright > Ambassador From Hell > Keith A. MacNevins > Elk Grove Village, IL > USA- Hide quoted text -
Your anger is making me stronger. It is increasing at a geometric rate. I have will soon be able to leap tall buildings with a single bound! Look up in the air! A bird? A plane? No, it's Keithie!
> I've noticed most people just ignore him now. Maybe if I were a bigger > man I'd do the same.
> On Sep 2, 9:03 am, Dave <dvor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > He is simply a troll. His only purpose is to manipulate the emotions > > of others and then feed off of them.
-- copyright Ambassador From Hell Keith A. MacNevins Elk Grove Village, IL USA
> Yeah, I've noticed I've been more pissed off than usual. Oh well. :)
> On Sep 2, 11:49 am, Delusional? <dtatu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dev you have been on a classic rant the past few days and it is quite > > enjoyable to watch :-) Happy Labor Day weekend and have a drink or > > six on me :-)
> > On Sep 2, 9:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > > is kind of fun.
> > > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > > regulars know these things about him.
> > > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > > waste of time."
> > > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > > lie.
> > > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.- > Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
-- copyright Ambassador From Hell Keith A. MacNevins Elk Grove Village, IL USA
> On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > is kind of fun.
> > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > regulars know these things about him.
> > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > waste of time."
> > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > lie.
> > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
> He has admitted more than once that he is just trying to stir things > up. I think every time you go after him you are just feeding his > ego.
-- copyright Ambassador From Hell Keith A. MacNevins Elk Grove Village, IL USA
> On Sep 2, 6:31 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > SEARCHER is a confounding poster. There is not a single person besides > > _possibly_ him that knows why he bothers to post here. But some people > > think he's alright, kind of have a strange affection for him, as do I > > just because he seems nice enough and the enigma of his existence here > > is kind of fun.
> > Keith is no mystery to anyone but himself. I think most of the > > regulars know these things about him.
> > (1) He is a sociopath. Google "sociopath" and take this quotation to > > heart. "Sorry, but it really does seem to me that if there is no God > > then morals and ethics and looking out for the welfare of others is a > > waste of time."
> > (2) He is a hypocrite. He whines that I'm too insulting and turns > > around and spews shit like "you finger cathy*BITCH*". He whines about > > the most minute spelling errors when historically his spelling has > > been far from perfect. He says shit about me needing a book on how to > > make friends when he is probably the one person in the history of > > Google Groups to have a one star rating with over a thousand votes.
> > (3) He is a liar. Back to the stupid Google stars, he claimed I was > > voting on my own posts. Er, okay Keith. We can throw out the fact that > > it isn't true and still prove it is a lie because you would have no > > way of knowing otherwise anyway. For the record, I don't give much of > > a shit about Google stars and they are stupid but a lie is still a > > lie.
> > I have said previously that I would like it if Keith MacNevins died. > > If you think sociopathism, hypocrisy, stupidity and lies are all good > > things then of course you are going to disagree with that. I don't > > think anyone has an argument that the world would not be a better > > place if something were to "happen" though.
> > And you just have to wonder why he's here. Is he really deluded enough > > to believe that people like him? Does he think that maybe me and > > cathyb and rappoccio and DGG and Belly and a few others are just > > jealous of him or something but all the lurkers are in stiches when he > > makes a pun and nodding their heads in agreement the rest of the time?
> > Anyway, this thread is for your theories in the field of MacNevology.
> Observer
> Keith is so inept that, his posts seldom even rise to the level of > *disgusting *.
> Regards
> Psychonomist
-- copyright Ambassador From Hell Keith A. MacNevins Elk Grove Village, IL USA
|
